From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@rabbit.us>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem.
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:44:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46815078.5060705@rabbit.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e47206b0706242007q487365d3gb7c12658b9669edd@mail.gmail.com>
Grant Taylor wrote:
> First and foremost: It did not cover the reason "... route caching will
> kill ..." to my satisfaction like you indicated.
Can you elaborate on this? My only issue with the kernel route balancing
is that route caching can not be disabled entirely, so traffic to the
same site will leave via the same channel, regardless if the other
channel is empty or not. I know that it is technically possible (kernel
option CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM), but it will work only for
globally routable addresses, while breaking NAT badly.
The reason I made my bold, as you call it, statement, is because 90% of
the time when someone is doing NAT, it is for a tightly joined group,
with similar interests - hence a lot of traffic duplication. For
instance if every user listens to the same online radiostation - how
would you work around it?
Let me know your thoughts
Peter
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-26 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-25 3:07 [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem John Chang
2007-06-25 14:47 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-25 21:30 ` VladSun
2007-06-26 6:46 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-26 11:36 ` John Chang
2007-06-26 14:37 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-26 15:04 ` Patrick Brandão
2007-06-26 17:44 ` Peter Rabbitson [this message]
2007-06-27 1:24 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 1:51 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 2:07 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 2:22 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27 2:34 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 2:39 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 3:07 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27 3:16 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 5:54 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 6:41 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27 6:43 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 6:58 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 7:28 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 7:37 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 7:53 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 7:57 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:03 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 8:03 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:11 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:24 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:26 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 9:09 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 10:19 ` Grant Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46815078.5060705@rabbit.us \
--to=rabbit@rabbit.us \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.