All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:53:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46821777.1000104@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e47206b0706242007q487365d3gb7c12658b9669edd@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/27/2007 2:50 AM, Mohan Sundaram wrote:
> """equalize - allow packet by packet randomization on multipath
> routes.  Without this  modifier,  the  route  will  be frozen  to one
> selected nexthop, so that load splitting will only occur on per-flow
> base. equalize only works if the kernel is patched."""

I think we both pasted the same quote.

If you do use the "equalize" keyword, you do get a packet by packet / 
per-packet effect.

Where as if you do not use the "equalize" keyword, you get a per-flow 
effect, which is what I was trying to state is the apparent default.



Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-27  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-25  3:07 [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem John Chang
2007-06-25 14:47 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-25 21:30 ` VladSun
2007-06-26  6:46 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-26 11:36 ` John Chang
2007-06-26 14:37 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-26 15:04 ` Patrick Brandão
2007-06-26 17:44 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27  1:24 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  1:51 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  2:07 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  2:22 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27  2:34 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  2:39 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  3:07 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27  3:16 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  5:54 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27  6:41 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27  6:43 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  6:58 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27  7:28 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  7:37 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  7:53 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2007-06-27  7:57 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  8:03 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27  8:03 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  8:11 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  8:24 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  8:26 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27  9:09 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 10:19 ` Grant Taylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46821777.1000104@riverviewtech.net \
    --to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.