From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:07:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4681C676.6030407@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e47206b0706242007q487365d3gb7c12658b9669edd@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/26/2007 9:03 PM, Mohan Sundaram wrote:
> The caching would be per destination IP - so it is likely all clients
> will use the same route and thus interface.
This could be a problem. I was taking the caching to be remembering
which route was chosen and believing it to be associated with a specific
source IP address. I can see this being a very large issue when trying
to do load balancing.
In light of this information, I think that better could be done in
Netfilter. However if there ever was a way to have route selection per
source IP in the kernel, I would be more interested in that.
I wonder if route selection caching would be different in different
routing tables. In other words use a different routing table for a
different (set of) clients. Thus one cached routing decision per
routing table which could differ per routing table.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-27 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-25 3:07 [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem John Chang
2007-06-25 14:47 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-25 21:30 ` VladSun
2007-06-26 6:46 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-26 11:36 ` John Chang
2007-06-26 14:37 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-26 15:04 ` Patrick Brandão
2007-06-26 17:44 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 1:24 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 1:51 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 2:07 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2007-06-27 2:22 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27 2:34 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 2:39 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 3:07 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27 3:16 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 5:54 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 6:41 ` Salim S I
2007-06-27 6:43 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 6:58 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 7:28 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 7:37 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 7:53 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 7:57 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:03 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 8:03 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:11 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:24 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 8:26 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-27 9:09 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-27 10:19 ` Grant Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4681C676.6030407@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.