From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
Cc: hbabu@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:58:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4720D933.3080703@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471F72AD.8030902@ct.jp.nec.com>
Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
>>> There are three patches;
>>> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
>>> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
>>> 3. unify crash_32/64.c
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches.
>>>
>>> I've compiled on both of 32bit and 64bit, and tested
>>> kdump on 64bit.
>>>
>> Hi Hiroshi,
>>
>> Thanks for the patches. Can you please also test it on 32bit to make
>> sure nothing is broken.
>
> Okay, I'll test it on 32bit.
> A build problem already has been found on 32bit.
>
I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before
applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt'
after kexec, showing below message.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz stepping 0a
Checking 'hlt' instruction...
v2.6.23.1 works fine for 1st kernel.
I'm investigating it..
Thanks
Hiroshi Shimamoto
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
Cc: hbabu@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:58:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4720D933.3080703@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471F72AD.8030902@ct.jp.nec.com>
Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
>>> There are three patches;
>>> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
>>> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
>>> 3. unify crash_32/64.c
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches.
>>>
>>> I've compiled on both of 32bit and 64bit, and tested
>>> kdump on 64bit.
>>>
>> Hi Hiroshi,
>>
>> Thanks for the patches. Can you please also test it on 32bit to make
>> sure nothing is broken.
>
> Okay, I'll test it on 32bit.
> A build problem already has been found on 32bit.
>
I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before
applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt'
after kexec, showing below message.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz stepping 0a
Checking 'hlt' instruction...
v2.6.23.1 works fine for 1st kernel.
I'm investigating it..
Thanks
Hiroshi Shimamoto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-20 1:18 [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-20 1:18 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-20 1:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-20 1:21 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-24 6:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-24 6:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-24 21:27 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-24 21:27 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-25 0:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-25 0:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-29 22:45 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-29 22:45 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-29 22:39 ` [PATCH] Revert " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-29 22:39 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-29 23:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-29 23:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-30 0:05 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-30 0:05 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-30 1:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-30 1:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-20 1:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: add safe_smp_processor_id " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-20 1:23 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-24 6:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-24 6:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-24 9:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-24 9:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-20 1:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-20 1:24 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-20 10:50 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-20 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-24 6:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-24 6:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-10-24 16:28 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-24 16:28 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-25 17:58 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto [this message]
2007-10-25 17:58 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-26 21:43 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-26 21:43 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-26 22:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-26 22:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-27 0:13 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-27 0:13 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-27 1:15 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2007-10-27 1:15 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4720D933.3080703@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.