From: Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
To: Peter Dolding <oiaohm@gmail.com>
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, Toshiharu Harada <haradats@gmail.com>,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@crispincowan.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:56:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <472EBE87.1050106@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7d8f83e0710311951nd162a27rb2134e3b21e299a8@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Peter Dolding wrote:
> On 11/1/07, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>> --- Peter Dolding <oiaohm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Posix capabilities predate SELinux. SELinux is not interested in
>> Posix capabilities.
>>
>>> But no IBM had to do it.
>> Err, no. It was done by Andrew Morgan back in the dark ages.
>> Why on earth do you think IBM did it?
>
> Posix file capabilities the option to replace SUID bit with something
> more security safe only handing out segments of root power instead of
> the complete box and dice like SUID. Even different on a user by user
> base.
>
> Posix capabilites is what Posix file capabilities is based on. Yes I
> know the words appear close. The word file is important. Please read
> Website. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-posixcap.html
For the record, I think you are both right. I took a stab at it back
when Casey and I first met:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/old/kernel-2.4-fcap/README
all that stuff worked fine it was just a bit ahead of its time...
- From memory, at that point in time "extended attributes" were an
external patch, and having some trouble getting merged. My sense was
that EA was a pre-requisite and I was happy to wait for that support to
become integrated before pushing my file capability support.
In the midst of all this LSM emerged as a reaction to Linus' clear
unhappiness about all extensions security. I didn't have the time to
participate in the LSM, and my work sat in the form of these patches.
SELinux at that time existed as a separate infrastructure, and evidently
did have the time to embrace LSM.
> IBM coders worked and got it into the main line really recently to
> provide at least some way to avoid fault of SUID of course it could
[...]
So, yes, IBM (Serge) deserve full credit for starting over, and getting
it merged...
Cheers
Andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHLr6EQheEq9QabfIRAsOrAJ9XzTL0Lqm5jaxwO6UoPB9Pwh3SzQCfVWFd
cPyjsGp/s6D6HuBE6M4NJH0=
=G/ah
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-05 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 19:04 Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Rob Meijer
2007-10-29 19:41 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-30 5:13 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-30 7:14 ` Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Cliffe
2007-10-30 6:55 ` Al Viro
2007-10-30 7:55 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-30 15:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-30 8:00 ` Cliffe
2007-10-30 12:30 ` Simon Arlott
2007-11-06 3:46 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-06 7:26 ` Cliffe
2007-11-06 23:59 ` Peter Dolding
2007-11-07 3:50 ` Cliffe
2007-11-07 3:35 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-11-07 4:11 ` Tetsuo Handa
2007-11-07 4:34 ` Peter Dolding
2007-11-07 4:34 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-30 18:42 ` Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-30 19:14 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-30 19:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-30 23:38 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-31 0:16 ` david
2007-10-31 2:21 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-31 3:43 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-31 5:08 ` david
2007-10-31 6:43 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-31 9:03 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-31 10:10 ` Toshiharu Harada
2007-11-01 2:04 ` Peter Dolding
2007-11-01 2:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-11-01 2:51 ` Peter Dolding
2007-11-01 7:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-11-01 11:49 ` David Newall
2007-11-04 1:28 ` Peter Dolding
2007-11-05 6:56 ` Andrew Morgan [this message]
2007-11-05 13:29 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-10-29 20:27 ` Casey Schaufler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-29 10:01 Rob Meijer
2007-10-29 10:24 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-29 13:32 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-18 2:18 LSM conversion to static interface Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19 20:26 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-10-19 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-20 11:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-20 22:57 ` James Morris
2007-10-23 4:09 ` LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch] Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-23 5:16 ` Chris Wright
2007-10-24 0:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-24 5:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-24 11:50 ` Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface Simon Arlott
2007-10-24 12:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 18:11 ` Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Simon Arlott
2007-10-24 18:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-24 18:59 ` Simon Arlott
2007-10-24 19:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-24 21:02 ` David P. Quigley
2007-10-24 21:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-10-24 21:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-24 22:02 ` David P. Quigley
2007-10-24 23:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-25 1:50 ` david
2007-10-25 3:50 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-10-24 21:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-24 21:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-24 22:04 ` David P. Quigley
2007-10-25 11:38 ` Simon Arlott
2007-10-24 20:18 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-24 20:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-24 21:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-24 22:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 22:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-24 23:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-25 0:41 ` Chris Wright
2007-10-25 2:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-30 3:37 ` Toshiharu Harada
2007-10-25 1:03 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-25 0:23 ` Chris Wright
2007-10-25 0:35 ` Ray Lee
2007-10-25 1:26 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-25 1:41 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-25 2:11 ` david
2007-10-25 18:17 ` Ray Lee
2007-10-25 22:21 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-26 3:45 ` david
2007-10-26 5:44 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-27 18:29 ` Pavel Machek
2007-10-28 18:48 ` Hua Zhong
2007-10-28 19:05 ` Hua Zhong
2007-10-28 22:08 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-28 22:50 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-26 20:42 ` serge
2007-10-28 23:55 ` Peter Dolding
2007-10-29 5:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-25 9:19 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2007-10-25 16:04 ` Ray Lee
2007-10-25 17:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-30 9:41 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2007-10-25 1:42 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-27 18:22 ` Pavel Machek
2007-10-30 3:23 ` Toshiharu Harada
2007-10-30 8:40 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-30 8:50 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-30 9:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-30 9:21 ` Toshiharu Harada
2007-10-25 11:44 ` Simon Arlott
2007-10-25 23:09 ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-10-26 2:56 ` Greg KH
2007-10-26 7:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-26 15:54 ` Greg KH
2007-10-26 9:46 ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-10-26 15:58 ` Greg KH
2007-10-26 16:32 ` Simon Arlott
2007-10-26 23:26 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=472EBE87.1050106@kernel.org \
--to=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=crispin@crispincowan.com \
--cc=haradats@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oiaohm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.