From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"Simon Horman [Horms]" <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/03] gpio: rcar: Use lazy disable and mask on suspend
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:17:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4743540.rTIWauTJHg@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoR+ngS5o77Lw1gUUzq-qcHuBZtfiiAnALvH_GsNMvNN7A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Magnus,
On Thursday 14 November 2013 11:03:06 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 November 2013 07:59:36 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >>
> >> Set the ->irq_enable() and ->irq_disable() methods to NULL
> >> to enable lazy disable of interrupts.
> >
> > Is that just for optimization purpose, or is there another reason ?
>
> It is needed for IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND operation, which in turn is
> needed for Suspend-to-RAM.
>
> >> Also extend the code to set IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND which tells the core
> >> that only IRQs marked as wakeups need to stay enabled during
> >> Suspend-to-RAM.
> >
> > Shouldn't this be split to a separate patch ?
>
> I could split them up, but since there is a dependency and since I
> mainly care about making sure Suspend-to-RAM works I preferred to keep
> them together.
Fine with me. Could you then please update the commit message to mention that
lazy disabling is required for IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND ? Same comment for
patch 03/03.
> >> Tested on the Lager board with GPIO-keys and Suspend-to-RAM.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --- 0001/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> >> +++ work/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c 2013-11-13 19:26:26.000000000 +0900
> >> @@ -368,10 +368,9 @@ static int gpio_rcar_probe(struct platfo
> >> irq_chip->name = name;
> >> irq_chip->irq_mask = gpio_rcar_irq_disable;
> >> irq_chip->irq_unmask = gpio_rcar_irq_enable;
> >> - irq_chip->irq_enable = gpio_rcar_irq_enable;
> >> - irq_chip->irq_disable = gpio_rcar_irq_disable;
> >> irq_chip->irq_set_type = gpio_rcar_irq_set_type;
> >> irq_chip->flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED;
> >> + irq_chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
> >
> > You can write it as
> >
> > irq_chip->flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED
> > | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
>
> I know. =) If that's the preferred way then..
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"Simon Horman [Horms]" <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/03] gpio: rcar: Use lazy disable and mask on suspend
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:17:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4743540.rTIWauTJHg@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoR+ngS5o77Lw1gUUzq-qcHuBZtfiiAnALvH_GsNMvNN7A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Magnus,
On Thursday 14 November 2013 11:03:06 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 November 2013 07:59:36 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >>
> >> Set the ->irq_enable() and ->irq_disable() methods to NULL
> >> to enable lazy disable of interrupts.
> >
> > Is that just for optimization purpose, or is there another reason ?
>
> It is needed for IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND operation, which in turn is
> needed for Suspend-to-RAM.
>
> >> Also extend the code to set IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND which tells the core
> >> that only IRQs marked as wakeups need to stay enabled during
> >> Suspend-to-RAM.
> >
> > Shouldn't this be split to a separate patch ?
>
> I could split them up, but since there is a dependency and since I
> mainly care about making sure Suspend-to-RAM works I preferred to keep
> them together.
Fine with me. Could you then please update the commit message to mention that
lazy disabling is required for IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND ? Same comment for
patch 03/03.
> >> Tested on the Lager board with GPIO-keys and Suspend-to-RAM.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --- 0001/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> >> +++ work/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c 2013-11-13 19:26:26.000000000 +0900
> >> @@ -368,10 +368,9 @@ static int gpio_rcar_probe(struct platfo
> >> irq_chip->name = name;
> >> irq_chip->irq_mask = gpio_rcar_irq_disable;
> >> irq_chip->irq_unmask = gpio_rcar_irq_enable;
> >> - irq_chip->irq_enable = gpio_rcar_irq_enable;
> >> - irq_chip->irq_disable = gpio_rcar_irq_disable;
> >> irq_chip->irq_set_type = gpio_rcar_irq_set_type;
> >> irq_chip->flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED;
> >> + irq_chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
> >
> > You can write it as
> >
> > irq_chip->flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED
> > | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
>
> I know. =) If that's the preferred way then..
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-14 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 22:59 [PATCH 00/03] gpio: R-Car and EM GPIO update Magnus Damm
2013-11-13 22:59 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-13 22:59 ` [PATCH 01/03] gpio: rcar: Use lazy disable and mask on suspend Magnus Damm
2013-11-13 22:59 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-14 0:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-14 0:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-14 2:03 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-14 2:03 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-14 2:17 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-11-14 2:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-14 8:50 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-14 8:50 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-14 14:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-14 14:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-13 22:59 ` [PATCH 02/03] gpio: em: Setup gpiochip->dev Magnus Damm
2013-11-13 22:59 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-14 0:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-14 0:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-13 22:59 ` [PATCH 03/03] gpio: em: Use lazy disable and mask on suspend Magnus Damm
2013-11-13 22:59 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-19 8:26 ` [PATCH 00/03] gpio: R-Car and EM GPIO update Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4743540.rTIWauTJHg@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.