All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
@ 2007-11-21 14:50 Kumar Gala
  2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2007-11-21 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Modify libfdt/Makefile to conditionally compile the *.c files based
on the board config.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
---

This is against u-boot-testing

 libfdt/Makefile       |    2 +-
 libfdt/fdt.c          |    5 -----
 libfdt/fdt_ro.c       |    5 -----
 libfdt/fdt_rw.c       |    5 -----
 libfdt/fdt_strerror.c |    5 -----
 libfdt/fdt_sw.c       |    5 -----
 libfdt/fdt_wip.c      |    5 -----
 7 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libfdt/Makefile b/libfdt/Makefile
index 126fa2c..d166cce 100644
--- a/libfdt/Makefile
+++ b/libfdt/Makefile
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ LIB	= $(obj)libfdt.a

 SOBJS	=

-COBJS-y += fdt.o fdt_ro.o fdt_rw.o fdt_strerror.o fdt_sw.o fdt_wip.o
+COBJS-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += fdt.o fdt_ro.o fdt_rw.o fdt_strerror.o fdt_sw.o fdt_wip.o

 COBJS	:= $(COBJS-y)
 SRCS 	:= $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c)
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt.c b/libfdt/fdt.c
index 1ee67ad..212b838 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
  * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
  */
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
 #include "libfdt_env.h"

 #include <fdt.h>
@@ -86,5 +83,3 @@ int fdt_move(const void *fdt, void *buf, int bufsize)
 	memmove(buf, fdt, fdt_totalsize(fdt));
 	return 0;
 }
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_ro.c b/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
index 46d525d..bc1a5f4 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
  * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
  */
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
 #include "libfdt_env.h"

 #include <fdt.h>
@@ -532,5 +529,3 @@ int fdt_get_reservemap(void *fdt, int n, struct fdt_reserve_entry *re)
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
index 55fcc41..852b6e6 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
  * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
  */
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
 #include "libfdt_env.h"

 #include <fdt.h>
@@ -320,5 +317,3 @@ int fdt_pack(void *fdt)
 	fdt_set_header(fdt, totalsize, _blob_data_size(fdt));
 	return 0;
 }
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c b/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c
index b49c952..7f231ce 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
  * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
  */
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
 #include "libfdt_env.h"

 #include <fdt.h>
@@ -65,5 +62,3 @@ const char *fdt_strerror(int errval)

 	return "<unknown error>";
 }
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_sw.c b/libfdt/fdt_sw.c
index c7eea8f..672f4dd 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_sw.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_sw.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
  * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
  */
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
 #include "libfdt_env.h"

 #include <fdt.h>
@@ -227,5 +224,3 @@ int fdt_finish(void *fdt)
 	fdt_set_header(fdt, magic, FDT_MAGIC);
 	return 0;
 }
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_wip.c b/libfdt/fdt_wip.c
index 2d39aab..2d2ed37 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_wip.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_wip.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
  * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
  */
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
 #include "libfdt_env.h"

 #include <fdt.h>
@@ -138,5 +135,3 @@ int fdt_replace_reservemap_entry(void *fdt, int n, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size)

 	return 0;
 }
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
-- 
1.5.3.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
  2007-11-21 14:50 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile Kumar Gala
@ 2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
  2007-11-21 15:29   ` Kumar Gala
  2007-11-21 16:41   ` Jon Loeliger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2007-11-21 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Kumar Gala wrote:
> Modify libfdt/Makefile to conditionally compile the *.c files based
> on the board config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> 
> This is against u-boot-testing
> 
>  libfdt/Makefile       |    2 +-
>  libfdt/fdt.c          |    5 -----
>  libfdt/fdt_ro.c       |    5 -----
>  libfdt/fdt_rw.c       |    5 -----
>  libfdt/fdt_strerror.c |    5 -----
>  libfdt/fdt_sw.c       |    5 -----
>  libfdt/fdt_wip.c      |    5 -----
>  7 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

Joy!

It looks like the side effect of Grant's improvement just removed all of 
the #ifdefs I hacked into the libfdt primary .c files.

Side note: I was playing last night with the "what if" of deleting (git 
rm libfdt/*.[ch]) all the "standard" libfdt code, then re-importing it. 
  Effectively rebaselining in a kerchunk rather than a patch-forward 
that Kumar has been doing.

The advantages would be:
* It would be clearer that u-boot/libfdt version 2007-11-X == dtc/libfdt 
version 2007-11-X and then we could more easily track changes forward.
* The removal patch is less than 40K (email list limit), but the 
re-import patch is around 70K (IIRC) so that doesn't help.

My current conclusion is that it isn't worth the effort.
* The re-import still has a size vs. email list problem
* Since some libfdt routines changed, other (client) routines must be 
changed at the same time as the re-import (Kumar's patch rolls libfdt 
forward _and_ fixes the handful of calls, so it doesn't have a "broken 
spot" in between patches).

Thanks to all!
gvb

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
  2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2007-11-21 15:29   ` Kumar Gala
  2007-11-21 16:42     ` Jon Loeliger
  2007-11-21 16:41   ` Jon Loeliger
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2007-11-21 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot


On Nov 21, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:

> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Modify libfdt/Makefile to conditionally compile the *.c files based
>> on the board config.
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
>> ---
>> This is against u-boot-testing
>> libfdt/Makefile       |    2 +-
>> libfdt/fdt.c          |    5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_ro.c       |    5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_rw.c       |    5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_strerror.c |    5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_sw.c       |    5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_wip.c      |    5 -----
>> 7 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> Joy!
>
> It looks like the side effect of Grant's improvement just removed  
> all of the #ifdefs I hacked into the libfdt primary .c files.
>
> Side note: I was playing last night with the "what if" of deleting  
> (git rm libfdt/*.[ch]) all the "standard" libfdt code, then re- 
> importing it.  Effectively rebaselining in a kerchunk rather than a  
> patch-forward that Kumar has been doing.
>
> The advantages would be:
> * It would be clearer that u-boot/libfdt version 2007-11-X == dtc/ 
> libfdt version 2007-11-X and then we could more easily track changes  
> forward.
> * The removal patch is less than 40K (email list limit), but the re- 
> import patch is around 70K (IIRC) so that doesn't help.
>
> My current conclusion is that it isn't worth the effort.
> * The re-import still has a size vs. email list problem
> * Since some libfdt routines changed, other (client) routines must  
> be changed at the same time as the re-import (Kumar's patch rolls  
> libfdt forward _and_ fixes the handful of calls, so it doesn't have  
> a "broken spot" in between patches).

I've just created a libfdt_testing branch that is based on this patch  
+ u-boot-testing.

If you do a diff between dtc/libfdt and u-boot/libfdt we now see no  
differences.

- k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
  2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
  2007-11-21 15:29   ` Kumar Gala
@ 2007-11-21 16:41   ` Jon Loeliger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Loeliger @ 2007-11-21 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 09:15, Jerry Van Baren wrote:

> Joy!
> 
> It looks like the side effect of Grant's improvement just removed all of 
> the #ifdefs I hacked into the libfdt primary .c files.

Curious, that, eh?


> My current conclusion is that it isn't worth the effort.
> * The re-import still has a size vs. email list problem
> * Since some libfdt routines changed, other (client) routines must be 
> changed at the same time as the re-import (Kumar's patch rolls libfdt 
> forward _and_ fixes the handful of calls, so it doesn't have a "broken 
> spot" in between patches).

In any event, just post patches, broken wherever, and if needed
for atomicity reason, they can be pulled from a repo with one
git command later.

Well, that's what seems reasonable to me anyway.

jdl

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
  2007-11-21 15:29   ` Kumar Gala
@ 2007-11-21 16:42     ` Jon Loeliger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Loeliger @ 2007-11-21 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 09:29, Kumar Gala wrote:


> I've just created a libfdt_testing branch that is based on this patch  
> + u-boot-testing.

Sweet.

> If you do a diff between dtc/libfdt and u-boot/libfdt we now see no  
> differences.
> 
> - k

Double sweet.  But does it still work? :-)

jdl

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-21 16:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-21 14:50 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile Kumar Gala
2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-11-21 15:29   ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-21 16:42     ` Jon Loeliger
2007-11-21 16:41   ` Jon Loeliger

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.