* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
@ 2007-11-21 14:50 Kumar Gala
2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2007-11-21 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Modify libfdt/Makefile to conditionally compile the *.c files based
on the board config.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
---
This is against u-boot-testing
libfdt/Makefile | 2 +-
libfdt/fdt.c | 5 -----
libfdt/fdt_ro.c | 5 -----
libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 5 -----
libfdt/fdt_strerror.c | 5 -----
libfdt/fdt_sw.c | 5 -----
libfdt/fdt_wip.c | 5 -----
7 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libfdt/Makefile b/libfdt/Makefile
index 126fa2c..d166cce 100644
--- a/libfdt/Makefile
+++ b/libfdt/Makefile
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ LIB = $(obj)libfdt.a
SOBJS =
-COBJS-y += fdt.o fdt_ro.o fdt_rw.o fdt_strerror.o fdt_sw.o fdt_wip.o
+COBJS-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += fdt.o fdt_ro.o fdt_rw.o fdt_strerror.o fdt_sw.o fdt_wip.o
COBJS := $(COBJS-y)
SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c)
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt.c b/libfdt/fdt.c
index 1ee67ad..212b838 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
#include "libfdt_env.h"
#include <fdt.h>
@@ -86,5 +83,3 @@ int fdt_move(const void *fdt, void *buf, int bufsize)
memmove(buf, fdt, fdt_totalsize(fdt));
return 0;
}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_ro.c b/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
index 46d525d..bc1a5f4 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
#include "libfdt_env.h"
#include <fdt.h>
@@ -532,5 +529,3 @@ int fdt_get_reservemap(void *fdt, int n, struct fdt_reserve_entry *re)
}
return 0;
}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
index 55fcc41..852b6e6 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
#include "libfdt_env.h"
#include <fdt.h>
@@ -320,5 +317,3 @@ int fdt_pack(void *fdt)
fdt_set_header(fdt, totalsize, _blob_data_size(fdt));
return 0;
}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c b/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c
index b49c952..7f231ce 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
#include "libfdt_env.h"
#include <fdt.h>
@@ -65,5 +62,3 @@ const char *fdt_strerror(int errval)
return "<unknown error>";
}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_sw.c b/libfdt/fdt_sw.c
index c7eea8f..672f4dd 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_sw.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_sw.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
#include "libfdt_env.h"
#include <fdt.h>
@@ -227,5 +224,3 @@ int fdt_finish(void *fdt)
fdt_set_header(fdt, magic, FDT_MAGIC);
return 0;
}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_wip.c b/libfdt/fdt_wip.c
index 2d39aab..2d2ed37 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_wip.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_wip.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
-#include "config.h"
-#if CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
-
#include "libfdt_env.h"
#include <fdt.h>
@@ -138,5 +135,3 @@ int fdt_replace_reservemap_entry(void *fdt, int n, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size)
return 0;
}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT */
--
1.5.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
2007-11-21 14:50 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile Kumar Gala
@ 2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-11-21 15:29 ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-21 16:41 ` Jon Loeliger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2007-11-21 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Modify libfdt/Makefile to conditionally compile the *.c files based
> on the board config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> This is against u-boot-testing
>
> libfdt/Makefile | 2 +-
> libfdt/fdt.c | 5 -----
> libfdt/fdt_ro.c | 5 -----
> libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 5 -----
> libfdt/fdt_strerror.c | 5 -----
> libfdt/fdt_sw.c | 5 -----
> libfdt/fdt_wip.c | 5 -----
> 7 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Joy!
It looks like the side effect of Grant's improvement just removed all of
the #ifdefs I hacked into the libfdt primary .c files.
Side note: I was playing last night with the "what if" of deleting (git
rm libfdt/*.[ch]) all the "standard" libfdt code, then re-importing it.
Effectively rebaselining in a kerchunk rather than a patch-forward
that Kumar has been doing.
The advantages would be:
* It would be clearer that u-boot/libfdt version 2007-11-X == dtc/libfdt
version 2007-11-X and then we could more easily track changes forward.
* The removal patch is less than 40K (email list limit), but the
re-import patch is around 70K (IIRC) so that doesn't help.
My current conclusion is that it isn't worth the effort.
* The re-import still has a size vs. email list problem
* Since some libfdt routines changed, other (client) routines must be
changed at the same time as the re-import (Kumar's patch rolls libfdt
forward _and_ fixes the handful of calls, so it doesn't have a "broken
spot" in between patches).
Thanks to all!
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2007-11-21 15:29 ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-21 16:42 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-11-21 16:41 ` Jon Loeliger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2007-11-21 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Nov 21, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Modify libfdt/Makefile to conditionally compile the *.c files based
>> on the board config.
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
>> ---
>> This is against u-boot-testing
>> libfdt/Makefile | 2 +-
>> libfdt/fdt.c | 5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_ro.c | 5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_strerror.c | 5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_sw.c | 5 -----
>> libfdt/fdt_wip.c | 5 -----
>> 7 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> Joy!
>
> It looks like the side effect of Grant's improvement just removed
> all of the #ifdefs I hacked into the libfdt primary .c files.
>
> Side note: I was playing last night with the "what if" of deleting
> (git rm libfdt/*.[ch]) all the "standard" libfdt code, then re-
> importing it. Effectively rebaselining in a kerchunk rather than a
> patch-forward that Kumar has been doing.
>
> The advantages would be:
> * It would be clearer that u-boot/libfdt version 2007-11-X == dtc/
> libfdt version 2007-11-X and then we could more easily track changes
> forward.
> * The removal patch is less than 40K (email list limit), but the re-
> import patch is around 70K (IIRC) so that doesn't help.
>
> My current conclusion is that it isn't worth the effort.
> * The re-import still has a size vs. email list problem
> * Since some libfdt routines changed, other (client) routines must
> be changed at the same time as the re-import (Kumar's patch rolls
> libfdt forward _and_ fixes the handful of calls, so it doesn't have
> a "broken spot" in between patches).
I've just created a libfdt_testing branch that is based on this patch
+ u-boot-testing.
If you do a diff between dtc/libfdt and u-boot/libfdt we now see no
differences.
- k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile
2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-11-21 15:29 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2007-11-21 16:41 ` Jon Loeliger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Loeliger @ 2007-11-21 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 09:15, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Joy!
>
> It looks like the side effect of Grant's improvement just removed all of
> the #ifdefs I hacked into the libfdt primary .c files.
Curious, that, eh?
> My current conclusion is that it isn't worth the effort.
> * The re-import still has a size vs. email list problem
> * Since some libfdt routines changed, other (client) routines must be
> changed at the same time as the re-import (Kumar's patch rolls libfdt
> forward _and_ fixes the handful of calls, so it doesn't have a "broken
> spot" in between patches).
In any event, just post patches, broken wherever, and if needed
for atomicity reason, they can be pulled from a repo with one
git command later.
Well, that's what seems reasonable to me anyway.
jdl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-21 16:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-21 14:50 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [BUILD] conditionally compile libfdt/*.c in libfdt/Makefile Kumar Gala
2007-11-21 15:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-11-21 15:29 ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-21 16:42 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-11-21 16:41 ` Jon Loeliger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.