Re: [PATCH 27/27] Update feature-removal-schedule.txt

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Could you take care of this one and let it sift through ->dave->linus->;
> what do you think, or same verdict as for the previous patch changing
> int->int32_t?
> 
> A few xtable modules use aligned_u64, which is how I found this one.
> 
> commit 35f2e577e432b28969710bc1fd4d9a4c0875f81b
> Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
> Date:   Wed Jan 2 17:30:18 2008 +0100
> 
>     linux/types.h: Use __u64 for aligned_u64
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/types.h b/include/linux/types.h
> index f4f8d19..b94c0e4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/types.h
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ typedef		__s64		int64_t;
>  #endif
>  
>  /* this is a special 64bit data type that is 8-byte aligned */
> -#define aligned_u64 unsigned long long __attribute__((aligned(8)))
> +#define aligned_u64 __u64 __attribute__((aligned(8)))
>  #define aligned_be64 __be64 __attribute__((aligned(8)))
>  #define aligned_le64 __le64 __attribute__((aligned(8)))


Looks good to me, applied.