All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: jonas@kwiboo.se, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add support for RV1103B
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 22:24:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47923648.fMDQidcC6G@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260216010219.2131484-2-festevam@gmail.com>

Am Montag, 16. Februar 2026, 02:02:17 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
> 
> Add the initial RV1103B devicetree.
> 
> Based on the 5.10 Rockchip vendor kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
> ---
> The <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rv1103b-cru.h> header comes from another
> series:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20260210022620.172570-1-festevam@gmail.com/
> 
> Maybe Heiko could apply the clock series as well?
> 
> Changes since v4:
> - None.
> 
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b-pinctrl.dtsi    | 816 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi       | 257 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 1073 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b-pinctrl.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi


> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5955b249d4ce
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rv1103b-cru.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,boot-mode.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +	compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b";
> +
> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> +	arm-pmu {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-pmu";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 127 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	xin32k: oscillator-32k {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <32768>;
> +		clock-output-names = "xin32k";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};

Please double-check where that xin32k is coming from in device-schematics.
Yes the xin24m is normally a dedicated oscillator, but the xin32k in
most cases is generated from the system-pmic.

So please check and most likely move that to the board dts.

Also, please sort node-names alphabetically (if there is no address)


> +	xin24m: oscillator-24m {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +		clock-output-names = "xin24m";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +		cpu0: cpu@0 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> +			reg = <0x0>;
> +			clocks = <&cru ARMCLK>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pinctrl: pinctrl {
> +		compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-pinctrl";
> +		rockchip,grf = <&ioc>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		gpio0: gpio@20520000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20520000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 75 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_PMU_GPIO0>, <&cru DBCLK_PMU_GPIO0>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +
> +		gpio1: gpio@20d80000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20d80000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_GPIO1>, <&cru DBCLK_GPIO1>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +
> +		gpio2: gpio@20840000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20840000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_GPIO2>, <&cru DBCLK_GPIO2>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	soc {
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		cru: clock-controller@20000000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-cru";
> +			reg = <0x20000000 0x81000>;
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			bootph-all;

I don't think we want u-boot-specific properties in mainline.
They are normally kept in separate -u-boot.dtsi files

> +		};

[...]

> +		uart1: serial@20870000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-uart", "snps,dw-apb-uart";

uart compatible, does not seem to have landed in the uart tree

> +			reg = <0x20870000 0x100>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			reg-shift = <2>;
> +			reg-io-width = <4>;
> +			clocks = <&cru SCLK_UART1>, <&cru PCLK_UART1>;
> +			clock-names = "baudclk", "apb_pclk";
> +			pinctrl-names = "default";
> +			pinctrl-0 = <&uart1m0_xfer>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};

[...]

> +		wdt: watchdog@208d0000 {
> +			compatible = "snps,dw-wdt";

please add a new compatible to the dw-wdt watchdog binding

> +			reg = <0x208d0000 0x100>;
> +			clocks = <&cru TCLK_WDT_NS>, <&cru PCLK_WDT_NS>;
> +			clock-names = "tclk", "pclk";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +


Heiko




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: jonas@kwiboo.se, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add support for RV1103B
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 22:24:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47923648.fMDQidcC6G@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260216010219.2131484-2-festevam@gmail.com>

Am Montag, 16. Februar 2026, 02:02:17 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
> 
> Add the initial RV1103B devicetree.
> 
> Based on the 5.10 Rockchip vendor kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
> ---
> The <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rv1103b-cru.h> header comes from another
> series:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20260210022620.172570-1-festevam@gmail.com/
> 
> Maybe Heiko could apply the clock series as well?
> 
> Changes since v4:
> - None.
> 
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b-pinctrl.dtsi    | 816 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi       | 257 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 1073 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b-pinctrl.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi


> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5955b249d4ce
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rv1103b-cru.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,boot-mode.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +	compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b";
> +
> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> +	arm-pmu {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-pmu";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 127 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	xin32k: oscillator-32k {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <32768>;
> +		clock-output-names = "xin32k";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};

Please double-check where that xin32k is coming from in device-schematics.
Yes the xin24m is normally a dedicated oscillator, but the xin32k in
most cases is generated from the system-pmic.

So please check and most likely move that to the board dts.

Also, please sort node-names alphabetically (if there is no address)


> +	xin24m: oscillator-24m {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +		clock-output-names = "xin24m";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +		cpu0: cpu@0 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> +			reg = <0x0>;
> +			clocks = <&cru ARMCLK>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pinctrl: pinctrl {
> +		compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-pinctrl";
> +		rockchip,grf = <&ioc>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		gpio0: gpio@20520000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20520000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 75 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_PMU_GPIO0>, <&cru DBCLK_PMU_GPIO0>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +
> +		gpio1: gpio@20d80000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20d80000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_GPIO1>, <&cru DBCLK_GPIO1>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +
> +		gpio2: gpio@20840000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20840000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_GPIO2>, <&cru DBCLK_GPIO2>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	soc {
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		cru: clock-controller@20000000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-cru";
> +			reg = <0x20000000 0x81000>;
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			bootph-all;

I don't think we want u-boot-specific properties in mainline.
They are normally kept in separate -u-boot.dtsi files

> +		};

[...]

> +		uart1: serial@20870000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-uart", "snps,dw-apb-uart";

uart compatible, does not seem to have landed in the uart tree

> +			reg = <0x20870000 0x100>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			reg-shift = <2>;
> +			reg-io-width = <4>;
> +			clocks = <&cru SCLK_UART1>, <&cru PCLK_UART1>;
> +			clock-names = "baudclk", "apb_pclk";
> +			pinctrl-names = "default";
> +			pinctrl-0 = <&uart1m0_xfer>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};

[...]

> +		wdt: watchdog@208d0000 {
> +			compatible = "snps,dw-wdt";

please add a new compatible to the dw-wdt watchdog binding

> +			reg = <0x208d0000 0x100>;
> +			clocks = <&cru TCLK_WDT_NS>, <&cru PCLK_WDT_NS>;
> +			clock-names = "tclk", "pclk";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +


Heiko



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-09 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-16  1:02 [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: Add RV1103B compatibles Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02 ` Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add support for RV1103B Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02   ` Fabio Estevam
2026-03-09 21:24   ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2026-03-09 21:24     ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-03-10 23:26     ` Fabio Estevam
2026-03-10 23:26       ` Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Omega4 Evaluation board Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02   ` Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16 17:47   ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-16 17:47     ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-16  1:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add Onion Omega4 Evaluation Board Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02   ` Fabio Estevam
2026-03-09 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: Add RV1103B compatibles Fabio Estevam
2026-03-09 14:57   ` Fabio Estevam
2026-03-09 19:40   ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-03-09 19:40     ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47923648.fMDQidcC6G@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=festevam@nabladev.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.