From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>Sam Ravnborg
<sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream] libata: implement libata.force module parameter
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:07:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B161C3.7040200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A356C3.3010904@garzik.org>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> This patch implements libata.force module parameter which can
>> selectively override ATA port, link and device configurations
>> including cable type, SATA PHY SPD limit, transfer mode and NCQ.
>>
>> For example, you can say "use 1.5Gbps for all fan-out ports attached
>> to the second port but allow 3.0Gbps for the PMP device itself, oh,
>> the device attached to the third fan-out port chokes on NCQ and
>> shouldn't go over UDMA4" by the following.
>>
>> libata.force=2:1.5g,2.15:3.0g,2.03:noncq,udma4
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> I guess it's about time we add something like this. More than
>> anything else this should help debugging and can serve as a last
>> resort to work around problems.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 35 +++
>> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 375
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 8
>> drivers/ata/libata.h | 1 4 files changed, 415
>> insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> ACK, but it breaks the build due to section type conflicts:
>
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c:108: error: ata_force_param_buf causes a
> section type conflict
>
> Given that the data is marked __initdata and the code is marked __init,
> I cannot see the problem.
Jeff, this no longer causes build failure whether libata is configured
built-in or as a module. I have no idea what's going on but there
doesn't seem to be a proper solution on the horizon yet. I think we can
go ahead and commit this one and convert it to __initdataconst when it
becomes available.
Thanks.
--
tejun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream] libata: implement libata.force module parameter
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:07:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B161C3.7040200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A356C3.3010904@garzik.org>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> This patch implements libata.force module parameter which can
>> selectively override ATA port, link and device configurations
>> including cable type, SATA PHY SPD limit, transfer mode and NCQ.
>>
>> For example, you can say "use 1.5Gbps for all fan-out ports attached
>> to the second port but allow 3.0Gbps for the PMP device itself, oh,
>> the device attached to the third fan-out port chokes on NCQ and
>> shouldn't go over UDMA4" by the following.
>>
>> libata.force=2:1.5g,2.15:3.0g,2.03:noncq,udma4
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> I guess it's about time we add something like this. More than
>> anything else this should help debugging and can serve as a last
>> resort to work around problems.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 35 +++
>> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 375
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 8
>> drivers/ata/libata.h | 1 4 files changed, 415
>> insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> ACK, but it breaks the build due to section type conflicts:
>
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c:108: error: ata_force_param_buf causes a
> section type conflict
>
> Given that the data is marked __initdata and the code is marked __init,
> I cannot see the problem.
Jeff, this no longer causes build failure whether libata is configured
built-in or as a module. I have no idea what's going on but there
doesn't seem to be a proper solution on the horizon yet. I think we can
go ahead and commit this one and convert it to __initdataconst when it
becomes available.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-12 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-01 15:14 [PATCH #upstream] libata: implement libata.force module parameter Tejun Heo
2008-02-01 17:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-01 17:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-01 18:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-08 4:18 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-12 0:24 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-12 9:07 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-02-12 9:07 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-13 0:15 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-13 16:24 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-14 0:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-14 16:24 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-20 17:13 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B161C3.7040200@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.