Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

[Gilles Chanteperdrix]

Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > this mail should be sent to Paul, but I would like to share with the xenomai 
 > developers. Probably then should be sent to the xenomai-core list, but I have 
 > looked the list and it has a high traffic ("for me now") and I'm not a 
 > developer. So please, Gilles or Jan (or the admin to the list) accept this 
 > message), I'm not subscriber.

Well, I am afraid we can not accept it. I searched the gna.org
administrative interface and could not find any trace of your mail.
In my opinion, you can subscribe to the list and disable mail
distribution, this way you will be able to post without receiving all
xenomai mails.

-- 


					    Gilles Chanteperdrix.

Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

[Jan Kiszka]

OK, to recall this message (and lift it to the list):

Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this mail should be sent to Paul, but I would like to share with the xenomai 
> developers. Probably then should be sent to the xenomai-core list, but I have 
> looked the list and it has a high traffic ("for me now") and I'm not a 
> developer. So please, Gilles or Jan (or the admin to the list) accept this 
> message), I'm not subscriber.
> 
> I have looked the debian package of xenomai. The package had a bug [1] that 
> Paul commented before. Also, there's  another bug that pass unattended in 
> that mail. For the first one, last week I asked to the debian-devel spanish 
> list and several people helped and finally Adeonato Simó helped with a patch 
> that solved this.

Paul, Gilles, can we apply the proposed fix to SVN (trunk+2.4.x, I
guess)? Or does it have some downside?

> 
> For the second:
> 
> E: xenomai: shell-script-fails-syntax-check ./usr/bin/xeno-test
> 
> I think that the core developers should look on it. Executing:
> 
> $ sh -n xeno-test
> xeno-test: line 404: syntax error near unexpected token `newline'
> xeno-test: line 404: `1. added -W <program invocation>'
> 
> I have found this error, this part of the script seems a notes about it. Maybe 
> it should be erased, or move, or comented, from the line 400 to the 430. If 
> the lines are commented, then the test is ok.

Leo, is this an issue for a specific shell when calling without -n? Or
who does invoke xeno-text with -n so that we run into this error? It's
no problem to comment out the notes, I just want to understand the
background of this report.

> 
> Now, again we have an active  rtai package, and I think that debian deserves a 
> xenomai package. So,  please, could you look on it and apply the patches 
> proposed?
> 
> Thank's ,
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Leo
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2007-11/msg00135.html
> [2] 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-devel-spanish%40lists.debian.org/msg04209.html

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

[Roland Stigge]

Hi,

I hope you don't mind that we move this to the xenomai-core mailing list
with CC, since I fear the same questions will be raised again there at
some point.

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Now the next question: You are providing i386 packages so far. Do you
> have plans for x86-64 as well?

The respective debian/control line currently is:

Architecture: amd64 arm i386 ia64 powerpc

At http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xenomai.html , you can also see the
current status of the different architectures' build daemons (i.e., a
link to the logs).

bye,
  Roland

Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

[Roland Stigge]

Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Also, xenomai could run in a IA64 ..

Anyone tested it? I can just declare it in the Debian package. If it's
untested, maybe I need to dedicate one of the IA64 machines here to
Xenomai... :-)

Roland

Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

[Jan Kiszka]

Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I hope you don't mind that we move this to the xenomai-core mailing list
> with CC, since I fear the same questions will be raised again there at
> some point.

Valid point!

> 
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Now the next question: You are providing i386 packages so far. Do you
>> have plans for x86-64 as well?
> 
> The respective debian/control line currently is:
> 
> Architecture: amd64 arm i386 ia64 powerpc
> 
> At http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xenomai.html , you can also see the
> current status of the different architectures' build daemons (i.e., a
> link to the logs).

Ah, I see... that powerpc already failed. :->

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

[Philippe Gerum]

Roland Stigge wrote:
> Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>> Also, xenomai could run in a IA64 ..
> 
> Anyone tested it? I can just declare it in the Debian package. If it's
> untested, maybe I need to dedicate one of the IA64 machines here to
> Xenomai... :-)
> 

Not tested here for a long time unfortunately, which explains the kernel
relic we still use on this arch. I have no Itanium at hand anymore.

> Roland
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xenomai-core mailing list
> Xenomai-core@domain.hid
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
> 


-- 
Philippe.

Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package

[Roland Stigge]

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Ah, I see... that powerpc already failed. :->

Of course... The DEBIAN/control "hackery" is operating on an
architecture independent package (linux-patch-xenomai), while only
building the architecture dependent packages on the build daemons...

Will be fixed in next revision... Thanks for the note!

Roland