* Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package [not found] <200802181213.29872.leo@domain.hid> @ 2008-02-18 19:08 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2008-02-25 11:20 ` Jan Kiszka 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2008-02-18 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda; +Cc: Jan Kiszka, Paul Corner, xenomai Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Hi, > > this mail should be sent to Paul, but I would like to share with the xenomai > developers. Probably then should be sent to the xenomai-core list, but I have > looked the list and it has a high traffic ("for me now") and I'm not a > developer. So please, Gilles or Jan (or the admin to the list) accept this > message), I'm not subscriber. Well, I am afraid we can not accept it. I searched the gna.org administrative interface and could not find any trace of your mail. In my opinion, you can subscribe to the list and disable mail distribution, this way you will be able to post without receiving all xenomai mails. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package [not found] <200802181213.29872.leo@domain.hid> 2008-02-18 19:08 ` [Xenomai-core] Debian package Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2008-02-25 11:20 ` Jan Kiszka [not found] ` <200802251317.23736.leo@domain.hid> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kiszka @ 2008-02-25 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda; +Cc: Paul Corner, xenomai OK, to recall this message (and lift it to the list): Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Hi, > > this mail should be sent to Paul, but I would like to share with the xenomai > developers. Probably then should be sent to the xenomai-core list, but I have > looked the list and it has a high traffic ("for me now") and I'm not a > developer. So please, Gilles or Jan (or the admin to the list) accept this > message), I'm not subscriber. > > I have looked the debian package of xenomai. The package had a bug [1] that > Paul commented before. Also, there's another bug that pass unattended in > that mail. For the first one, last week I asked to the debian-devel spanish > list and several people helped and finally Adeonato Simó helped with a patch > that solved this. Paul, Gilles, can we apply the proposed fix to SVN (trunk+2.4.x, I guess)? Or does it have some downside? > > For the second: > > E: xenomai: shell-script-fails-syntax-check ./usr/bin/xeno-test > > I think that the core developers should look on it. Executing: > > $ sh -n xeno-test > xeno-test: line 404: syntax error near unexpected token `newline' > xeno-test: line 404: `1. added -W <program invocation>' > > I have found this error, this part of the script seems a notes about it. Maybe > it should be erased, or move, or comented, from the line 400 to the 430. If > the lines are commented, then the test is ok. Leo, is this an issue for a specific shell when calling without -n? Or who does invoke xeno-text with -n so that we run into this error? It's no problem to comment out the notes, I just want to understand the background of this report. > > Now, again we have an active rtai package, and I think that debian deserves a > xenomai package. So, please, could you look on it and apply the patches > proposed? > > Thank's , > > Best regards, > > Leo > > > > [1] https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2007-11/msg00135.html > [2] > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-devel-spanish%40lists.debian.org/msg04209.html Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200802251317.23736.leo@domain.hid>]
[parent not found: <47C2B9E5.9090900@domain.hid>]
[parent not found: <18371.16698.219209.759123@domain.hid>]
[parent not found: <47C3CA72.1090100@domain.hid>]
[parent not found: <47C3D7A9.6090300@domain.hid>]
* Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package [not found] ` <47C3D7A9.6090300@domain.hid> @ 2008-02-26 9:39 ` Roland Stigge 2008-02-26 9:59 ` Jan Kiszka [not found] ` <200802261028.30101.leo@domain.hid> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Roland Stigge @ 2008-02-26 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: Paul Corner, xenomai, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Hi, I hope you don't mind that we move this to the xenomai-core mailing list with CC, since I fear the same questions will be raised again there at some point. Jan Kiszka wrote: > Now the next question: You are providing i386 packages so far. Do you > have plans for x86-64 as well? The respective debian/control line currently is: Architecture: amd64 arm i386 ia64 powerpc At http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xenomai.html , you can also see the current status of the different architectures' build daemons (i.e., a link to the logs). bye, Roland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package 2008-02-26 9:39 ` Roland Stigge @ 2008-02-26 9:59 ` Jan Kiszka 2008-02-26 10:36 ` Roland Stigge 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kiszka @ 2008-02-26 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Roland Stigge; +Cc: Paul Corner, xenomai, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > I hope you don't mind that we move this to the xenomai-core mailing list > with CC, since I fear the same questions will be raised again there at > some point. Valid point! > > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Now the next question: You are providing i386 packages so far. Do you >> have plans for x86-64 as well? > > The respective debian/control line currently is: > > Architecture: amd64 arm i386 ia64 powerpc > > At http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xenomai.html , you can also see the > current status of the different architectures' build daemons (i.e., a > link to the logs). Ah, I see... that powerpc already failed. :-> Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package 2008-02-26 9:59 ` Jan Kiszka @ 2008-02-26 10:36 ` Roland Stigge 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Roland Stigge @ 2008-02-26 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: Paul Corner, xenomai, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Jan Kiszka wrote: > Ah, I see... that powerpc already failed. :-> Of course... The DEBIAN/control "hackery" is operating on an architecture independent package (linux-patch-xenomai), while only building the architecture dependent packages on the build daemons... Will be fixed in next revision... Thanks for the note! Roland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200802261028.30101.leo@domain.hid>]
* Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package [not found] ` <200802261028.30101.leo@domain.hid> @ 2008-02-26 9:54 ` Roland Stigge 2008-02-26 10:19 ` Philippe Gerum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Roland Stigge @ 2008-02-26 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda; +Cc: Jan Kiszka, Paul Corner, xenomai Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Also, xenomai could run in a IA64 .. Anyone tested it? I can just declare it in the Debian package. If it's untested, maybe I need to dedicate one of the IA64 machines here to Xenomai... :-) Roland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-core] Debian package 2008-02-26 9:54 ` Roland Stigge @ 2008-02-26 10:19 ` Philippe Gerum 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Philippe Gerum @ 2008-02-26 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Roland Stigge; +Cc: Jan Kiszka, Paul Corner, xenomai, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Roland Stigge wrote: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >> Also, xenomai could run in a IA64 .. > > Anyone tested it? I can just declare it in the Debian package. If it's > untested, maybe I need to dedicate one of the IA64 machines here to > Xenomai... :-) > Not tested here for a long time unfortunately, which explains the kernel relic we still use on this arch. I have no Itanium at hand anymore. > Roland > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-core mailing list > Xenomai-core@domain.hid > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core > -- Philippe. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-26 10:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200802181213.29872.leo@domain.hid>
2008-02-18 19:08 ` [Xenomai-core] Debian package Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-02-25 11:20 ` Jan Kiszka
[not found] ` <200802251317.23736.leo@domain.hid>
[not found] ` <47C2B9E5.9090900@domain.hid>
[not found] ` <18371.16698.219209.759123@domain.hid>
[not found] ` <47C3CA72.1090100@domain.hid>
[not found] ` <47C3D7A9.6090300@domain.hid>
2008-02-26 9:39 ` Roland Stigge
2008-02-26 9:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-26 10:36 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <200802261028.30101.leo@domain.hid>
2008-02-26 9:54 ` Roland Stigge
2008-02-26 10:19 ` Philippe Gerum
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.