From: Jochen Roth <jroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
oprofile-list <oprofile-list@lists.sf.net>,
cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Updated: Reworked Cell OProfile: SPU mutex lock fix
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 18:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4821DEB0.7050308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209587712.7531.42.camel@carll-linux-desktop>
Carl,
I applied your patch on Jeremy's latest kernel.org spufs tree.
> +void oprofile_add_value(unsigned long value, int cpu) {
> + struct oprofile_cpu_buffer * cpu_buf = &cpu_buffer[cpu];
Shouldn't it be
struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *cpu_buf = &per_cpu(cpu_buffer, cpu);
At least my compiler complained about that.
I booted a kernel with your patches applied and the system locked up
anyway:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
0xd0000000004fe9a8
Faulting instruction address: 0xd000000000330ad8
cpu 0x0: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c00000003c337680]
pc: d000000000330ad8: .alloc_cpu_buffers+0x7c/0x12c [oprofile]
lr: d000000000330abc: .alloc_cpu_buffers+0x60/0x12c [oprofile]
sp: c00000003c337900
msr: 9000000000009032
dar: d0000000004fe9a8
dsisr: 42000000
current = 0xc00000003e128600
paca = 0xc0000000005b3480
pid = 2356, comm = oprofiled
enter ? for help
[c00000003c3379a0] d0000000003302ac .oprofile_setup+0x2c/0x134 [oprofile]
[c00000003c337a30] d00000000033176c .event_buffer_open+0x7c/0xc8 [oprofile]
[c00000003c337ac0] c0000000000d6ca8 .__dentry_open+0x190/0x308
[c00000003c337b70] c0000000000e7a5c .do_filp_open+0x3c4/0x8e8
[c00000003c337d00] c0000000000d6a1c .do_sys_open+0x80/0x14c
[c00000003c337db0] c0000000001192f4 .compat_sys_open+0x24/0x38
[c00000003c337e30] c0000000000076b4 syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
--- Exception: c01 (System Call) at 000000000ff006f8
SP (ffc6f6a0) is in userspace
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jochen Roth <jroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
oprofile-list <oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Updated: Reworked Cell OProfile: SPU mutex lock fix
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 18:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4821DEB0.7050308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209587712.7531.42.camel@carll-linux-desktop>
Carl,
I applied your patch on Jeremy's latest kernel.org spufs tree.
> +void oprofile_add_value(unsigned long value, int cpu) {
> + struct oprofile_cpu_buffer * cpu_buf = &cpu_buffer[cpu];
Shouldn't it be
struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *cpu_buf = &per_cpu(cpu_buffer, cpu);
At least my compiler complained about that.
I booted a kernel with your patches applied and the system locked up
anyway:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
0xd0000000004fe9a8
Faulting instruction address: 0xd000000000330ad8
cpu 0x0: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c00000003c337680]
pc: d000000000330ad8: .alloc_cpu_buffers+0x7c/0x12c [oprofile]
lr: d000000000330abc: .alloc_cpu_buffers+0x60/0x12c [oprofile]
sp: c00000003c337900
msr: 9000000000009032
dar: d0000000004fe9a8
dsisr: 42000000
current = 0xc00000003e128600
paca = 0xc0000000005b3480
pid = 2356, comm = oprofiled
enter ? for help
[c00000003c3379a0] d0000000003302ac .oprofile_setup+0x2c/0x134 [oprofile]
[c00000003c337a30] d00000000033176c .event_buffer_open+0x7c/0xc8 [oprofile]
[c00000003c337ac0] c0000000000d6ca8 .__dentry_open+0x190/0x308
[c00000003c337b70] c0000000000e7a5c .do_filp_open+0x3c4/0x8e8
[c00000003c337d00] c0000000000d6a1c .do_sys_open+0x80/0x14c
[c00000003c337db0] c0000000001192f4 .compat_sys_open+0x24/0x38
[c00000003c337e30] c0000000000076b4 syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
--- Exception: c01 (System Call) at 000000000ff006f8
SP (ffc6f6a0) is in userspace
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-07 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-30 20:35 [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Updated: Reworked Cell OProfile: SPU mutex lock fix Carl Love
2008-04-30 20:35 ` Carl Love
2008-05-07 16:54 ` Jochen Roth [this message]
2008-05-07 16:54 ` Jochen Roth
2008-05-07 17:09 ` Carl Love
2008-05-07 17:09 ` Carl Love
2008-05-08 7:50 ` Jochen Roth
2008-05-08 7:50 ` Jochen Roth
[not found] ` <1210199526.7726.43.camel@carll-linux-desktop>
[not found] ` <4822B03B.5060509@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2008-05-08 20:47 ` Carl Love
2008-05-09 15:07 ` Robert Richter
2008-05-09 15:07 ` Robert Richter
2008-05-10 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-10 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4821DEB0.7050308@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.