From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce a new Linux defined feature flag for PAT support
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 14:40:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4822F4A1.2030602@keyaccess.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878wylayiw.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On 08-05-08 12:19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Use a new Linux defined X86_FEATURE_PAT_GOOD feature flag to
>
> Better would be PAT_TESTED or PAT_RANDOMLY_APPROVED. Most of these
> CPUs without PAT_GOOD have actually perfectly good PAT, as Windows
> proves every day.
>
> The main flaw in all of this of course is that there is no procedure
> to test CPUs which do not have the flag set yet.
Quite. And hiding the fact that the CPU _should_ have perfectly good
PAT doesn't help any at all. The discussion turned into a mini-flame
war enough that now noone would even consider backing down, but this
current PAT setup just sucks plain and simple.
Rene.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 1:48 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6 Rene Herman
2008-05-07 2:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 12:46 ` Undocumented and duplicated code Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 13:14 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 20:52 ` 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6 Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-07 20:59 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 21:10 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-07 21:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 22:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-07 22:29 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 22:04 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 22:23 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 22:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 0:02 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 0:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 0:10 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-08 0:28 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 1:57 ` [PATCH] x86: introduce a new Linux defined feature flag for PAT support Rene Herman
2008-05-08 1:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-08 2:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 2:17 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 2:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-08 2:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 12:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 13:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-08 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 13:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-08 13:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 14:44 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 16:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 16:53 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 2:04 ` [PATCH] x86: enable PAT support on AMD Duron model 7 Rene Herman
2008-05-08 2:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-08 2:12 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 10:19 ` [PATCH] x86: introduce a new Linux defined feature flag for PAT support Andi Kleen
2008-05-08 12:40 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2008-05-08 13:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-08 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-08 16:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 0:21 ` 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6 Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 0:30 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-08 0:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-08 0:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-08 10:14 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-08 16:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-07 21:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-07 22:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 22:14 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 22:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 22:37 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 22:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 23:02 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 23:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-07 23:10 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 23:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-07 22:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 22:39 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 22:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 23:06 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-07 23:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-07 22:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 22:30 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 22:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-07 13:00 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 13:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-07 14:09 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 14:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-07 19:08 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 22:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-07 19:39 ` Daniel Hazelton
2008-05-07 20:06 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-07 20:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-07 20:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-08 4:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4822F4A1.2030602@keyaccess.nl \
--to=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.