* Further percpu/pda unification?
@ 2008-06-02 14:23 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 15:28 ` Mike Travis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2008-06-02 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Travis, Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Rusty Russell
I notice that there's now a unified asm-x86/percpu.h, and the pda is now
a per-cpu variable. But I also see that most of the stuff in percpu.h
is 32-bit only: all the accessor macros, x86_read/write_percpu, etc. Is
there some reason why that can't be made common, or is it just that
nobody has got around to it yet?
Thanks,
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Further percpu/pda unification?
2008-06-02 14:23 Further percpu/pda unification? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2008-06-02 15:28 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-02 15:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2008-06-02 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Ingo Molnar, Rusty Russell
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I notice that there's now a unified asm-x86/percpu.h, and the pda is now
> a per-cpu variable. But I also see that most of the stuff in percpu.h
> is 32-bit only: all the accessor macros, x86_read/write_percpu, etc. Is
> there some reason why that can't be made common, or is it just that
> nobody has got around to it yet?
>
> Thanks,
> J
Hi Jeremy,
I'll have a further unification patch shortly, just doing final testing now.
Thanks,
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-02 16:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-02 14:23 Further percpu/pda unification? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 15:28 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-02 15:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.