From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:24:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48600697.4080800@keyaccess.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4860028E.5000304@keyaccess.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2182 bytes --]
On 23-06-08 22:07, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 23-06-08 19:54, Len Brown wrote:
>
>> Rene,
>> Thank you for reporting this.
>>
>> I agree that this failure is an unwelcome surprise to those users
>> who upgrade to 2.6.26 but are still using libsensors <= 2.10.6.
>>
>> Jean, Mark, Hans,
>>
>> I'm actually fine with adding a temporary kernel config option
>> along the lines Rene suggested to ease the migration
>> to linux-2.6.26 for those users.
>>
>> But the config option would need to be scheduled for removal
>> after a certain period (say 6 months) so we don't have to maintain
>> it forever.
>>
>> More importantly, I think it would also have to be disabled by default
>> so that it would not have a negative impact on what we think are the
>> majority of properly configured systems. After all, we fixed this
>> bug in user-space about out 4 months ago and as you point out, the
>> distro upgrade path is actually quite well looked after.
>>
>> So I'm not sure how useful it would be to the target users.
>> After they run into the problem, they'd probably google it
>> and find that they can either tweak a kernel config option
>> or upgrade libsensors. And we'd prefer that they do the
>> later rather than the former, yes?
>>
>> just let me know.
>
> Thank you for the reason. Yes, people upgrading libsensors would be
> preferred and this issue should show up in google now.
>
> Frankly, if I had gone to the lm-sensors homepage and had seen a fixed
> 2.x version available I'd no doubt have shrugged it off then and there
> so I might as well do so now that Delvare announced that it's _going_ to
> be there real soon. 2.10.7 should be painless enough as an upgrade, it's
> needing lm-sensors 3.0(.2) and all its listed accompanying patches to
> programs depending on libsensors which triggered this thread.
>
> So, <shrug>. I know how to fix my own systems, others will be able to
> find out and once lm-sensors 2.10.7 is available, it's not a big deal
> anymore.
>
> That said, here's the "make it optional" patch tweaked according to your
> comments. Feel free to drop it on the floor...
Typo(s) in the feature-removal-schedule (only change).
Rene.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-acpi-thermal-allow-disabling-of-thermal-zone-hwmon.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4415 bytes --]
>From 7b41d17346cdd1f9db1223c024bd9f4604ee5c82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:50:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] acpi/thermal: allow disabling of thermal zone hwmon support
2.6.26-rc gained a hwmon interface to the Thermal Zone driver
which unfortunately breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace and renders
all other (subsequent) hwmon sensors inoperable also.
Many systems, current slackware and derivative systems among
them, are using lm-sensors 2 and would be affected. A new
lm-sensors 2.10.7 release is needed to fix this from the user
side.
This makes the hwmon support optional (enabled by default) and
comments that it needs a new enough lm-sensors userspace. This
also immediately schedules the option for removal again as this
is only intended to not break systems over the 2.6.26 upgrade
when new enough lm-sensors is not yet available or widely
deployed.
Signed-off-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
CC: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
CC: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
CC: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
CC: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 9 +++++++++
drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++----
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 5b3f31f..46ece3f 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -312,3 +312,12 @@ When: 2.6.26
Why: Implementation became generic; users should now include
linux/semaphore.h instead.
Who: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
+
+---------------------------
+
+What: CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
+When: January 2009
+Why: This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
+ to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
+ removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
+Who: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
index 4b62852..0b359ab 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
@@ -12,3 +12,13 @@ menuconfig THERMAL
cooling devices.
All platforms with ACPI thermal support can use this driver.
If you want this support, you should say Y or M here.
+
+config THERMAL_HWMON
+ bool "Hardware monitoring support"
+ depends on HWMON=y || HWMON=THERMAL
+ default y
+ help
+ The generic thermal sysfs driver's hardware monitoring support
+ requires a 2.10.7/3.0.2 or later lm-sensors userspace.
+
+ Say Y unless you need support for older lm-sensors.
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
index 6098787..fe07462 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
@@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ thermal_cooling_device_trip_point_show(struct device *dev,
/* Device management */
-#if defined(CONFIG_HWMON) || \
- (defined(CONFIG_HWMON_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_MODULE))
+#if defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON)
+
/* hwmon sys I/F */
#include <linux/hwmon.h>
static LIST_HEAD(thermal_hwmon_list);
diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
index 06d3e6e..917707e 100644
--- a/include/linux/thermal.h
+++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
@@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ struct thermal_cooling_device {
((long)t-2732+5)/10 : ((long)t-2732-5)/10)
#define CELSIUS_TO_KELVIN(t) ((t)*10+2732)
-#if defined(CONFIG_HWMON) || \
- (defined(CONFIG_HWMON_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_MODULE))
+#if defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON)
/* thermal zone devices with the same type share one hwmon device */
struct thermal_hwmon_device {
char type[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH];
@@ -94,8 +93,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
struct idr idr;
struct mutex lock; /* protect cooling devices list */
struct list_head node;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HWMON) || \
- (defined(CONFIG_HWMON_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_MODULE))
+#if defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON)
struct list_head hwmon_node;
struct thermal_hwmon_device *hwmon;
struct thermal_hwmon_attr temp_input; /* hwmon sys attr */
--
1.5.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc,
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:24:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48600697.4080800@keyaccess.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4860028E.5000304@keyaccess.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2182 bytes --]
On 23-06-08 22:07, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 23-06-08 19:54, Len Brown wrote:
>
>> Rene,
>> Thank you for reporting this.
>>
>> I agree that this failure is an unwelcome surprise to those users
>> who upgrade to 2.6.26 but are still using libsensors <= 2.10.6.
>>
>> Jean, Mark, Hans,
>>
>> I'm actually fine with adding a temporary kernel config option
>> along the lines Rene suggested to ease the migration
>> to linux-2.6.26 for those users.
>>
>> But the config option would need to be scheduled for removal
>> after a certain period (say 6 months) so we don't have to maintain
>> it forever.
>>
>> More importantly, I think it would also have to be disabled by default
>> so that it would not have a negative impact on what we think are the
>> majority of properly configured systems. After all, we fixed this
>> bug in user-space about out 4 months ago and as you point out, the
>> distro upgrade path is actually quite well looked after.
>>
>> So I'm not sure how useful it would be to the target users.
>> After they run into the problem, they'd probably google it
>> and find that they can either tweak a kernel config option
>> or upgrade libsensors. And we'd prefer that they do the
>> later rather than the former, yes?
>>
>> just let me know.
>
> Thank you for the reason. Yes, people upgrading libsensors would be
> preferred and this issue should show up in google now.
>
> Frankly, if I had gone to the lm-sensors homepage and had seen a fixed
> 2.x version available I'd no doubt have shrugged it off then and there
> so I might as well do so now that Delvare announced that it's _going_ to
> be there real soon. 2.10.7 should be painless enough as an upgrade, it's
> needing lm-sensors 3.0(.2) and all its listed accompanying patches to
> programs depending on libsensors which triggered this thread.
>
> So, <shrug>. I know how to fix my own systems, others will be able to
> find out and once lm-sensors 2.10.7 is available, it's not a big deal
> anymore.
>
> That said, here's the "make it optional" patch tweaked according to your
> comments. Feel free to drop it on the floor...
Typo(s) in the feature-removal-schedule (only change).
Rene.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-acpi-thermal-allow-disabling-of-thermal-zone-hwmon.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4414 bytes --]
From 7b41d17346cdd1f9db1223c024bd9f4604ee5c82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:50:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] acpi/thermal: allow disabling of thermal zone hwmon support
2.6.26-rc gained a hwmon interface to the Thermal Zone driver
which unfortunately breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace and renders
all other (subsequent) hwmon sensors inoperable also.
Many systems, current slackware and derivative systems among
them, are using lm-sensors 2 and would be affected. A new
lm-sensors 2.10.7 release is needed to fix this from the user
side.
This makes the hwmon support optional (enabled by default) and
comments that it needs a new enough lm-sensors userspace. This
also immediately schedules the option for removal again as this
is only intended to not break systems over the 2.6.26 upgrade
when new enough lm-sensors is not yet available or widely
deployed.
Signed-off-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
CC: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
CC: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
CC: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
CC: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 9 +++++++++
drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++----
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 5b3f31f..46ece3f 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -312,3 +312,12 @@ When: 2.6.26
Why: Implementation became generic; users should now include
linux/semaphore.h instead.
Who: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
+
+---------------------------
+
+What: CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
+When: January 2009
+Why: This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
+ to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
+ removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
+Who: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
index 4b62852..0b359ab 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
@@ -12,3 +12,13 @@ menuconfig THERMAL
cooling devices.
All platforms with ACPI thermal support can use this driver.
If you want this support, you should say Y or M here.
+
+config THERMAL_HWMON
+ bool "Hardware monitoring support"
+ depends on HWMON=y || HWMON=THERMAL
+ default y
+ help
+ The generic thermal sysfs driver's hardware monitoring support
+ requires a 2.10.7/3.0.2 or later lm-sensors userspace.
+
+ Say Y unless you need support for older lm-sensors.
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
index 6098787..fe07462 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
@@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ thermal_cooling_device_trip_point_show(struct device *dev,
/* Device management */
-#if defined(CONFIG_HWMON) || \
- (defined(CONFIG_HWMON_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_MODULE))
+#if defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON)
+
/* hwmon sys I/F */
#include <linux/hwmon.h>
static LIST_HEAD(thermal_hwmon_list);
diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
index 06d3e6e..917707e 100644
--- a/include/linux/thermal.h
+++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
@@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ struct thermal_cooling_device {
((long)t-2732+5)/10 : ((long)t-2732-5)/10)
#define CELSIUS_TO_KELVIN(t) ((t)*10+2732)
-#if defined(CONFIG_HWMON) || \
- (defined(CONFIG_HWMON_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_MODULE))
+#if defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON)
/* thermal zone devices with the same type share one hwmon device */
struct thermal_hwmon_device {
char type[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH];
@@ -94,8 +93,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
struct idr idr;
struct mutex lock; /* protect cooling devices list */
struct list_head node;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HWMON) || \
- (defined(CONFIG_HWMON_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_MODULE))
+#if defined(CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON)
struct list_head hwmon_node;
struct thermal_hwmon_device *hwmon;
struct thermal_hwmon_attr temp_input; /* hwmon sys attr */
--
1.5.5
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-23 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-22 0:47 [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-22 0:47 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-22 7:28 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 7:28 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 13:15 ` [REGRESSION, ABI] " Rene Herman
2008-06-22 13:15 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-22 13:23 ` [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-22 13:23 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-22 14:29 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 14:29 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 15:26 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-22 15:26 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-22 18:07 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 18:07 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 18:25 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-22 18:25 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-22 21:58 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-22 21:58 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 1:44 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Zhang Rui
2008-06-23 1:44 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Zhang Rui
2008-06-23 5:21 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Hans de Goede
2008-06-23 5:21 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Hans de Goede
2008-06-23 10:40 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-23 10:40 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 11:06 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 11:06 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 10:56 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 10:56 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 17:54 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Len Brown
2008-06-23 17:54 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Len Brown
2008-06-23 19:54 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 19:54 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 20:07 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-23 20:07 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 20:24 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2008-06-23 20:24 ` Rene Herman
2008-06-22 15:43 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-22 15:43 ` [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 10:08 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 10:08 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 10:24 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-23 10:24 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 11:57 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 11:57 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 12:35 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-23 12:35 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 13:47 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 13:47 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Jean Delvare
2008-06-23 14:06 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-23 14:06 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 14:31 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Matthew Garrett
2008-06-23 14:31 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Matthew Garrett
2008-06-23 17:10 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Rene Herman
2008-06-23 17:10 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Rene Herman
2008-06-23 13:51 ` LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Hans de Goede
2008-06-23 13:51 ` Hans de Goede
2008-06-23 13:51 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 7:30 ` Hans de Goede
2008-06-22 7:30 ` [lm-sensors] LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48600697.4080800@keyaccess.nl \
--to=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.