Re: the printk problem

[Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Still all happily untested, of course. And still with no actual users 
>> converted.
> 
> Ok, it's tested, and here's an example usage conversion.
> 
> The diffstat pretty much says it all. It _does_ change the format of the 
> stack trace entry a bit, but I don't think it's for the worse (unless it 
> breaks things like the oops tracker - Arjan?)
> 
> It changes the symbol-in-module format from
> 
> 	:ext3:add_dirent_to_buf+0x6c/0x26c
> 
> to
> 
> 	add_dirent_to_buf+0x6c/0x26c [ext3]
> 
> but quite frankly, the latter was the standard format anyway (it's what 
> "sprint_symbol()" gives you), and traps_64.c was the odd man out.
> 

This won't break anything for me actually; I already deal with either case.

$ cat oopsparse.pl | wc -l
1252

the kernel is so inconsistent with oops formats (over time/across architectures)
that once you deal with what there is today... you pretty much deal with everything.

I also like the improvement; I wished something like this existed several times already
in the last few months so for sure

Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>