From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
ed.pollard@ibm.com, epollard@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes [v2]
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:31:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888925E.8050504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724223309C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>> But I think Prarit is right with this change. If the interface defines
>> this behavior the IOMMU drivers have to implement it. I am just
>> wondering that the problem never showed up before. The GART driver is a
>> few years old now.
>>
>
> Yeah, I'm not against fixing IOMMUs to make alloc_consistent return
> the reqeuested size aligned memory. My point is that it's not likely
> to fix anything. Even with the patch, we hit the above problem because
> as I explained, the root cause of the problem is the boundary issue;
> we need to fix pci-dma.c
>
>
Sorry, I misquoted code up there and was looking for a clear example of
where this would happen. The issue I'm trying to resolve didn't happen
on the skge -- it was just a convenient piece of code to examine and
point out ;)
P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-24 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 11:19 [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes [v2] Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-23 22:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-07-23 23:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-23 23:47 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 7:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-07-24 10:09 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 10:34 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-24 12:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-07-24 12:49 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 13:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-24 14:31 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2008-07-24 14:40 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-24 15:13 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 14:45 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-28 22:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-29 14:24 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-29 17:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-30 0:43 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-06 12:29 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-06 13:23 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-06 13:35 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-06 14:32 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-07 17:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-08-07 17:41 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-08 7:12 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-08-08 15:18 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-08 16:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-08-08 21:13 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-09 1:40 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-09 3:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-15 16:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-15 18:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-15 20:39 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-15 21:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-16 1:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-17 12:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-17 15:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-17 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-17 15:48 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-17 15:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-07 17:45 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-23 23:23 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-23 23:24 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4888925E.8050504@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=ed.pollard@ibm.com \
--cc=epollard@redhat.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.