From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
mgross@linux.intel.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
hmh@hmh.eng.br, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:11:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888A9B3.8070004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724153816.GE2254@local>
>>> Well, it says "Industrial I/O". To me, this means it handles I/O devices
>>> typically found in industrial applications.
>>>
>> Yes, industrial is generally process control of manufacturing
>> processes which in my view is making this sound like it is limiting
>> the field of operations.
>>
> OK, I agree.
>
Agreed, though don't yet have a better idea.
In fact my use cases are all really embedded systems anyway.
>> All the applications we would currently need are things like
>> handheld PDA type devices which are hardly 'industrial' or small
>> consumer measurement systems.
>>
>
> Well, though the _use_ of such devices might not be "industrial",
> _technically_ they are very similar to embedded systems found in
> automation or other industrial equipment.
>
> Many of these devices (all that have mmappable memory) can be handled
> with a UIO driver, but for the rest (mostly stuff connected to serial
> busses), it's important to have a subsystem in the kernel. I really
> don't care too much about its name. BTW, before UIO was first published,
> its internal name was "Industrial I/O" ;-)
>
lol. We could try and make it the standard working name for all new
subsystems ;)
--
Jonathan Cameron
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
mgross@linux.intel.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
hmh@hmh.eng.br, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:11:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888A9B3.8070004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724153816.GE2254@local>
>>> Well, it says "Industrial I/O". To me, this means it handles I/O devices
>>> typically found in industrial applications.
>>>
>> Yes, industrial is generally process control of manufacturing
>> processes which in my view is making this sound like it is limiting
>> the field of operations.
>>
> OK, I agree.
>
Agreed, though don't yet have a better idea.
In fact my use cases are all really embedded systems anyway.
>> All the applications we would currently need are things like
>> handheld PDA type devices which are hardly 'industrial' or small
>> consumer measurement systems.
>>
>
> Well, though the _use_ of such devices might not be "industrial",
> _technically_ they are very similar to embedded systems found in
> automation or other industrial equipment.
>
> Many of these devices (all that have mmappable memory) can be handled
> with a UIO driver, but for the rest (mostly stuff connected to serial
> busses), it's important to have a subsystem in the kernel. I really
> don't care too much about its name. BTW, before UIO was first published,
> its internal name was "Industrial I/O" ;-)
>
lol. We could try and make it the standard working name for all new
subsystems ;)
--
Jonathan Cameron
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-24 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 17:00 [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:00 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:08 ` [Patch 1/4] Industrialio Core Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:08 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 18:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-23 18:31 ` [lm-sensors] " Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-24 10:12 ` [spi-devel-general] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 10:12 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 19:42 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-23 19:42 ` [lm-sensors] " Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 10:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 10:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 9:01 ` Eric Piel
2008-07-24 9:01 ` [lm-sensors] " Eric Piel
2008-07-24 11:56 ` [spi-devel-general] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 11:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:11 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 2/4] Max1363 (and similar) ADCs Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:14 ` [Patch 3/4] ST LIS3L02DQ accelerometer Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:14 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:07 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-23 17:07 ` [lm-sensors] " Alan Cox
2008-07-23 17:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:44 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:17 ` [Patch 4/4] VTI SCA3000 Series accelerometer driver Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:17 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:48 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 17:48 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-24 9:44 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Eric Piel
2008-07-24 9:44 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, Eric Piel
2008-07-24 10:08 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 10:08 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 12:20 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:20 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:13 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:13 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:37 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Eric Piel
2008-07-24 12:37 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Eric Piel
2008-07-24 12:45 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:45 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 13:26 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Dmitry Torokhov
2008-07-24 13:26 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Dmitry Torokhov
2008-07-24 13:39 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 13:39 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 18:36 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) David Brownell
2008-07-23 18:36 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, David Brownell
2008-07-23 19:19 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Ben Dooks
2008-07-23 19:19 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 7:41 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Hans J. Koch
2008-07-24 7:41 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Hans J. Koch
2008-07-24 9:19 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Alan Cox
2008-07-24 9:19 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Alan Cox
2008-07-24 12:28 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:28 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 10:01 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 10:01 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 15:38 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Hans J. Koch
2008-07-24 15:38 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Hans J. Koch
2008-07-24 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2008-07-24 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:32 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:32 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 19:33 ` [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Ben Dooks
2008-07-23 19:33 ` [lm-sensors] [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 17:57 ` [Patch 5/4] IndustrialIO subsystem very early cut of documentation + userspace demo Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 17:57 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 5/4] IndustrialIO subsystem very early cut of Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 22:25 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-24 22:25 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-25 11:12 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-25 11:12 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-25 11:28 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-25 11:28 ` [lm-sensors] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4888A9B3.8070004@gmail.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@gmail.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=bn@niasdigital.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dtor@mail.ru \
--cc=hjk@linutronix.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.