From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
michael@free-electrons.com, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
matthew@wil.cx, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:24:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48974973.6000408@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804181641.GE25940@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:52:37PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Le Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:38:48 -0400,
>> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> a écrit :
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, why does the nfs client need disabling, but not
>>> nfsd, gfs2, fuse, etc.?
>> Then also need disabling.
>
> OK by me, but again, why exactly? Since you're replacing the locking
> calls they used by stubs that just return errors, in theory nfs, nfsd,
> gfs2, and the rest should still compile and run, just without locking
> support, right?
I think so, but haven't tested this myself.
However, I would still be inclined to NOT add the extra config
dependencies. Just my 2 cents.
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
michael@free-electrons.com, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
matthew@wil.cx, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:24:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48974973.6000408@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804181641.GE25940@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:52:37PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Le Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:38:48 -0400,
>> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> a écrit :
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, why does the nfs client need disabling, but not
>>> nfsd, gfs2, fuse, etc.?
>> Then also need disabling.
>
> OK by me, but again, why exactly? Since you're replacing the locking
> calls they used by stubs that just return errors, in theory nfs, nfsd,
> gfs2, and the rest should still compile and run, just without locking
> support, right?
I think so, but haven't tested this myself.
However, I would still be inclined to NOT add the extra config
dependencies. Just my 2 cents.
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
michael@free-electrons.com, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
matthew@wil.cx, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:24:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48974973.6000408@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804181641.GE25940@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:52:37PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Le Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:38:48 -0400,
>> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> a écrit :
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, why does the nfs client need disabling, but not
>>> nfsd, gfs2, fuse, etc.?
>> Then also need disabling.
>
> OK by me, but again, why exactly? Since you're replacing the locking
> calls they used by stubs that just return errors, in theory nfs, nfsd,
> gfs2, and the rest should still compile and run, just without locking
> support, right?
I think so, but haven't tested this myself.
However, I would still be inclined to NOT add the extra config
dependencies. Just my 2 cents.
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-31 9:27 [patch 0/4] [resend] Add configuration options to disable features not needed on embedded devices Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 9:27 ` [patch 1/4] Configure out AIO support Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 10:09 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-07-31 10:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 22:42 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-07-31 22:42 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-08-05 18:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-05 18:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-05 18:36 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-07-31 9:27 ` [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 13:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 14:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 14:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 14:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 15:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 15:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 16:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 16:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 16:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 16:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 16:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 16:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 16:57 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 16:57 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 17:32 ` Tim Bird
2008-07-31 18:12 ` Robert Schwebel
2008-07-31 19:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-01 7:28 ` Robert Schwebel
2008-07-31 19:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 20:37 ` Tim Bird
2008-08-02 16:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 13:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-08-04 13:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-08-04 18:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 18:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 18:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 18:24 ` Tim Bird [this message]
2008-08-04 18:24 ` Tim Bird
2008-08-04 18:24 ` Tim Bird
2008-08-04 18:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 18:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 18:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 18:54 ` Matt Mackall
2008-08-04 18:54 ` Matt Mackall
2008-08-04 19:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 19:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 19:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 22:32 ` Tim Bird
2008-08-04 22:32 ` Tim Bird
2008-08-06 13:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-08-06 13:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-08-07 22:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-07 22:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-31 9:27 ` [patch 3/4] Configure out ethtool support Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 10:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-07-31 10:49 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 10:54 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 10:57 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 10:42 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 10:51 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 11:33 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 11:46 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 11:50 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 15:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-31 16:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 16:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 9:27 ` [patch 4/4] Configure out IGMP support Thomas Petazzoni
2008-08-01 19:41 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-04 12:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-08-04 12:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-08-04 12:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-04 12:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-04 13:53 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-04 13:53 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 9:40 ` [patch 0/4] [resend] Add configuration options to disable features not needed on embedded devices David Miller
2008-07-31 9:51 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 9:55 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 9:59 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 10:02 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 10:15 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 10:25 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 17:59 ` Tim Bird
2008-07-31 18:50 ` [patch 0/4] [resend] Add configuration options to disable features Ulrich Teichert
2008-07-31 18:50 ` Ulrich Teichert
2008-07-31 19:46 ` Josh Boyer
2008-07-31 19:55 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-01 7:17 ` Robert Schwebel
2008-08-01 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-01 19:47 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-31 16:42 ` [patch 0/4] [resend] Add configuration options to disable features not needed on embedded devices Tim Bird
2008-07-31 17:20 ` Tim Bird
[not found] <20080729154520.728594017@free-electrons.com>
[not found] ` <20080729154747.872888047@free-electrons.com>
2008-07-29 18:17 ` [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-29 18:57 ` Matt Mackall
2008-07-29 20:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-30 14:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-30 15:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2008-07-31 6:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-31 6:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48974973.6000408@am.sony.com \
--to=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=michael@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.