All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* renaming util/biosdisk.c
@ 2008-08-31 16:49 Robert Millan
  2008-08-31 18:07 ` Pavel Roskin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Millan @ 2008-08-31 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: grub-devel


Hi,

I think we discussed before about util/biosdisk.c being a confusing name,
but I can't find that thread.  Did we agree on renaming it to something
else?  If so, what to?

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: renaming util/biosdisk.c
  2008-08-31 16:49 renaming util/biosdisk.c Robert Millan
@ 2008-08-31 18:07 ` Pavel Roskin
  2008-08-31 18:37   ` Robert Millan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Roskin @ 2008-08-31 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 18:49 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think we discussed before about util/biosdisk.c being a confusing name,
> but I can't find that thread.  Did we agree on renaming it to something
> else?  If so, what to?

My preference:
util/hostdisk.c

Runners-up:
util/osdisk.c
util/sysdisk.c
util/disk.c

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: renaming util/biosdisk.c
  2008-08-31 18:07 ` Pavel Roskin
@ 2008-08-31 18:37   ` Robert Millan
  2008-08-31 19:06     ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Millan @ 2008-08-31 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:07:08PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 18:49 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I think we discussed before about util/biosdisk.c being a confusing name,
> > but I can't find that thread.  Did we agree on renaming it to something
> > else?  If so, what to?
> 
> My preference:
> util/hostdisk.c

I like hostdisk too, as it's consistent with hostfs.  Any objections to the
proposed rename?

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: renaming util/biosdisk.c
  2008-08-31 18:37   ` Robert Millan
@ 2008-08-31 19:06     ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
  2008-09-08 13:51       ` Robert Millan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vesa Jääskeläinen @ 2008-08-31 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:07:08PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 18:49 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think we discussed before about util/biosdisk.c being a confusing name,
>>> but I can't find that thread.  Did we agree on renaming it to something
>>> else?  If so, what to?
>> My preference:
>> util/hostdisk.c
> 
> I like hostdisk too, as it's consistent with hostfs.  Any objections to the
> proposed rename?

Nope.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: renaming util/biosdisk.c
  2008-08-31 19:06     ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
@ 2008-09-08 13:51       ` Robert Millan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Millan @ 2008-09-08 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:06:40PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:07:08PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 18:49 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I think we discussed before about util/biosdisk.c being a confusing name,
> >>> but I can't find that thread.  Did we agree on renaming it to something
> >>> else?  If so, what to?
> >> My preference:
> >> util/hostdisk.c
> > 
> > I like hostdisk too, as it's consistent with hostfs.  Any objections to the
> > proposed rename?
> 
> Nope.

Ok, done.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-08 13:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-31 16:49 renaming util/biosdisk.c Robert Millan
2008-08-31 18:07 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-08-31 18:37   ` Robert Millan
2008-08-31 19:06     ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
2008-09-08 13:51       ` Robert Millan

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.