git conversion and what is missing?

git conversion and what is missing?

[Holger Freyther]

Hey,

I wonder what is missing until we finally switch to git? From my point of view 
it is:

	- Finishing this table [1]
	- Maybe fixing the script to get this one rev importer properly
	- Run the conversation...

comments?
	z.

PS: In the OM tree I changed base.bbclass to handle git repo's (almost) 
properly for the welcome message.

[1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Talk:Monotone_to_Git_ID_mapping

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 807 bytes --]

Holger Freyther wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> I wonder what is missing until we finally switch to git? From my point of view 
> it is:
> 
> 	- Finishing this table [1]

How do we do this? In some cases the name is in the email address, but 
what about the rest?

Philip

> 	- Maybe fixing the script to get this one rev importer properly
> 	- Run the conversation...
> 
> comments?
> 	z.
> 
> PS: In the OM tree I changed base.bbclass to handle git repo's (almost) 
> properly for the welcome message.
> 
> [1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Talk:Monotone_to_Git_ID_mapping
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Thomas Kunze]

Philip Balister schrieb:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I wonder what is missing until we finally switch to git? From my 
>> point of view it is:
>>
>>     - Finishing this table [1]
NOTE: This table contains not only the people that have commit access 
but everybody who has contibuted something. We
should keep this in mind before running some scripts that give access to 
the git repository.
>>
>
> How do we do this? In some cases the name is in the email address, but 
> what about the rest?
IMO we should just disable commit access for people who didn't bother to 
add their e-mail address. If they come back to oe later
we can reenable the accounts.

Regards,
Thomas

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Otavio Salvador]

Holger Freyther <zecke@selfish.org> writes:

> Hey,
>
> I wonder what is missing until we finally switch to git? From my point of view 
> it is:
>
> 	- Finishing this table [1]

It is obvious we should try to complete it as much as possible but I
doubt we'll complete it. I think we should set a deadline and move it
further. Otherwise we risk to stuck on it.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 881 bytes --]

Thomas Kunze wrote:
> Philip Balister schrieb:
>> Holger Freyther wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I wonder what is missing until we finally switch to git? From my 
>>> point of view it is:
>>>
>>>     - Finishing this table [1]
> NOTE: This table contains not only the people that have commit access 
> but everybody who has contibuted something. We
> should keep this in mind before running some scripts that give access to 
> the git repository.
>>>
>>
>> How do we do this? In some cases the name is in the email address, but 
>> what about the rest?
> IMO we should just disable commit access for people who didn't bother to 
> add their e-mail address. If they come back to oe later
> we can reenable the accounts.

I think the table is needed to properly fill out some of the commit 
messages during the conversion.

Holger, I am right about this?

Philip

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Otavio Salvador]

Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> writes:

> I think the table is needed to properly fill out some of the commit
> messages during the conversion.
>
> Holger, I am right about this?

Yes; it is used during conversion to properly set commits to the right
author names however I believe we can't hold it forever. We need to
set a deadline and if someone didn't fill it... so sorry. 

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Holger Freyther]

On Sunday 28 September 2008 00:05:55 Philip Balister wrote:

> I think the table is needed to properly fill out some of the commit
> messages during the conversion.
>
> Holger, I am right about this?

Yes, you are. In git land the author has a name and mail address. People will 
try to send email to the mail address so it should be correct. The other part 
is there should be a name otherwise stuff like git-commit -c SHA1 will fail.

I like Otavio's idea with the deadline. The question is what to do with 
unknown names (coming from people using --author on mtn ci). Should we use 
the comitter id and put the name from mtn inside the comment?


z.

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Koen Kooi]

On 27-09-2008 22:37, Holger Freyther wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I wonder what is missing until we finally switch to git? From my point of view
> it is:
>
> 	- Finishing this table [1]
> 	- Maybe fixing the script to get this one rev importer properly
> 	- Run the conversation...

* graft on the bk history

regards,

Koen


>
> comments?
> 	z.
>
> PS: In the OM tree I changed base.bbclass to handle git repo's (almost)
> properly for the welcome message.
>
> [1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Talk:Monotone_to_Git_ID_mapping

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:38:48PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:

> Yes; it is used during conversion to properly set commits to the right
> author names however I believe we can't hold it forever. We need to
> set a deadline and if someone didn't fill it... so sorry. 

If they miss the deadline they could still be added to .mailmap later
which would fix up most of the interesting cases (eg, git log output).

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Marcin Juszkiewicz]

On Saturday 27 of September 2008 22:37:19 Holger Freyther wrote:

>  - Finishing this table [1]

I filled some entries - now about 40 left.
-- 
JID: hrw@jabber.org

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Michael Krelin]

Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:38:48PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 
>> Yes; it is used during conversion to properly set commits to the right
>> author names however I believe we can't hold it forever. We need to
>> set a deadline and if someone didn't fill it... so sorry. 
> 
> If they miss the deadline they could still be added to .mailmap later
> which would fix up most of the interesting cases (eg, git log output).
> 

That should've been "we", not "they", no? :-)

     ""                   : (["broonie"], ""),

Love,
H

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:19:52PM +0200, Michael Krelin wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> >>Yes; it is used during conversion to properly set commits to the right
> >>author names however I believe we can't hold it forever. We need to
> >>set a deadline and if someone didn't fill it... so sorry. 

> >If they miss the deadline they could still be added to .mailmap later
> >which would fix up most of the interesting cases (eg, git log output).

> That should've been "we", not "they", no? :-)

>     ""                   : (["broonie"], ""),

Hrm, looks like that was me.  No idea why my e-mail address got dropped
from the commit...

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Otavio Salvador]

Holger Freyther <zecke@selfish.org> writes:

> I like Otavio's idea with the deadline. The question is what to do with 
> unknown names (coming from people using --author on mtn ci). Should we use 
> the comitter id and put the name from mtn inside the comment?

This looks like a good idea. This gives the credit to the author while
doesn't block the migration. 

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Michael Krelin]

Commit '4232c25232afeb1e9c40200800577a6eb00246a3' by Laibsch. Perhaps, 
Rolf's got the patch from you on IRC?

Love,
H

Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:19:52PM +0200, Michael Krelin wrote:
>> Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>>> Yes; it is used during conversion to properly set commits to the right
>>>> author names however I believe we can't hold it forever. We need to
>>>> set a deadline and if someone didn't fill it... so sorry. 
> 
>>> If they miss the deadline they could still be added to .mailmap later
>>> which would fix up most of the interesting cases (eg, git log output).
> 
>> That should've been "we", not "they", no? :-)
> 
>>     ""                   : (["broonie"], ""),
> 
> Hrm, looks like that was me.  No idea why my e-mail address got dropped
> from the commit...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:27:12PM +0200, Michael Krelin wrote:
> Commit '4232c25232afeb1e9c40200800577a6eb00246a3' by Laibsch. Perhaps, 
> Rolf's got the patch from you on IRC?

Nope, went via the bug tracker (I had to grovel out the commit in
question to figure out if that was actually me).

Re: git conversion and what is missing?

[Felipe Contreras]

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Holger Freyther <zecke@selfish.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I wonder what is missing until we finally switch to git? From my point of view
> it is:
>
>        - Finishing this table [1]
>        - Maybe fixing the script to get this one rev importer properly
>        - Run the conversation...

So there are no issues with the script?

-- 
Felipe Contreras