From: Mohan Kumar M <mohan@in.ibm.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>,
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: dtb and purgatory support for ppc32
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:14:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E5B134.6050506@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081002100553.GA5886@verge.net.au>
Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
>
> I'm not speaking on behalf of Kumar Gala, just on behalf of myself.
>
Hi Horms,
> I would like to get some review of this patch by if possible.
> Also, I'm a little unclear of how it will interact with the
> patches that Mohan Kumar sent this week. But at this point
> I don't see any particular need to break the patch up into
> smaller pieices.
>
My patches are meant for PPC64 only. The patch implements support for
relocatable kdump kernel on PPC64 platform.
So I don't think Sebastian's patches need to support this relocation
support in the kexec-tools as of now.
Regards,
Mohan.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mohan Kumar M <mohan@in.ibm.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: dtb and purgatory support for ppc32
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:14:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E5B134.6050506@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081002100553.GA5886@verge.net.au>
Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
>
> I'm not speaking on behalf of Kumar Gala, just on behalf of myself.
>
Hi Horms,
> I would like to get some review of this patch by if possible.
> Also, I'm a little unclear of how it will interact with the
> patches that Mohan Kumar sent this week. But at this point
> I don't see any particular need to break the patch up into
> smaller pieices.
>
My patches are meant for PPC64 only. The patch implements support for
relocatable kdump kernel on PPC64 platform.
So I don't think Sebastian's patches need to support this relocation
support in the kexec-tools as of now.
Regards,
Mohan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-03 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 21:20 [RFC] kexec support on Book-e, ppc32 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-01 21:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-01 21:20 ` [RFC] powerpc: add kexec support on Book-E Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-01 21:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-10 3:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-10 3:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-12 13:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-12 13:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-01 21:20 ` [RFC] powerpc: enable kexec support on mpc8544ds Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-01 21:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-01 21:20 ` [PATCH] powerpc: dtb and purgatory support for ppc32 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-01 21:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-02 3:54 ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-02 3:54 ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-02 7:50 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-10-02 7:50 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-10-02 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2008-10-02 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2008-10-03 5:44 ` Mohan Kumar M [this message]
2008-10-03 5:44 ` Mohan Kumar M
2008-10-02 12:52 ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-02 12:52 ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-02 13:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-02 13:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-08 3:03 ` Simon Horman
2008-10-08 3:03 ` Simon Horman
2008-10-12 13:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-12 13:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-15 3:37 ` Simon Horman
2008-10-15 3:37 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E5B134.6050506@in.ibm.com \
--to=mohan@in.ibm.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.