[PATCH -tip] cpuset doesn't seem to be so const

[PATCH -tip] cpuset doesn't seem to be so const

[Frederic Weisbecker]

This fixes a warning on last -tip:

kernel/cpuset.c: Dans la fonction «scan_for_empty_cpusets» :
kernel/cpuset.c:1932: attention : passing argument 1 of «list_add_tail» discards qualifiers from pointer target type

Actually the struct cpuset *root passed in parameter to scan_for_empty_cpusets
is not supposed to be const since an entry is added on the tail of its list.
Just correct the qualifier.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/cpuset.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 827cd9a..eab7bd6 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ static void remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset(struct cpuset *cs)
  * that has tasks along with an empty 'mems'.  But if we did see such
  * a cpuset, we'd handle it just like we do if its 'cpus' was empty.
  */
-static void scan_for_empty_cpusets(const struct cpuset *root)
+static void scan_for_empty_cpusets(struct cpuset *root)
 {
 	LIST_HEAD(queue);
 	struct cpuset *cp;	/* scans cpusets being updated */

Re: [PATCH -tip] cpuset doesn't seem to be so const

[Ingo Molnar]

* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

> This fixes a warning on last -tip:
> 
> kernel/cpuset.c: Dans la fonction «scan_for_empty_cpusets» :
> kernel/cpuset.c:1932: attention : passing argument 1 of «list_add_tail» discards qualifiers from pointer target type
> 
> Actually the struct cpuset *root passed in parameter to scan_for_empty_cpusets
> is not supposed to be const since an entry is added on the tail of its list.
> Just correct the qualifier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

applied to tip/sched/cpusets, thanks Frederic!

	Ingo