Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Elias Oltmanns wrote:
>>>> -		ata_port_for_each_link(link, ap) {
>>>> -			ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, link)
>>>> +		ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) {
>>>> +			ata_for_each_dev(dev, link, ALL)
>>> Where did these short forms (EDGE, ALL) spring from? Does this code even
>>> compile?
>> +#define ata_for_each_link(link, ap, mode) \
>> +	for ((link) = ata_link_next(NULL, (ap), ATA_LITER_##mode); (link); \
>> +	     (link) = ata_link_next((link), (ap), ATA_LITER_##mode))
>> +
>> +#define ata_for_each_dev(dev, link, mode) \
>> +	for ((dev) = ata_dev_next(NULL, (link), ATA_DITER_##mode); (dev); \
>> +	     (dev) = ata_dev_next((dev), (link), ATA_DITER_##mode))
> 
> Sorry, I should have been more explicit. I was referring to EDGE and ALL
> as opposed to ATA_LITER_EDGE and ATA_DITER_ALL. Unless I've missed
> something, the former aren't defined anywhere in your patch.

I seriously can't be more explicit.  Please take a shower and read my
reply again, especially, the "ATA_[LD]ITER_##mode" part.  :-)

-- 
tejun