From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4 UPDATED] libata: fix device iteration bugs
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:59:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49059F0B.3000508@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490584EF.8040700@kernel.org>
There were several places where only enabled devices should be
iterated over but device enabledness wasn't checked.
* IDENTIFY data 40 wire check in cable_is_40wire()
* xfer_mode/ncq_enabled saving in ata_scsi_error()
* DUBIOUS_XFER handling in ata_set_mode()
While at it, reformat comments in cable_is_40wire().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
Comments reformatted as per Sergei's comment.
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Index: work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -4158,29 +4158,33 @@ static int cable_is_40wire(struct ata_po
struct ata_link *link;
struct ata_device *dev;
- /* If the controller thinks we are 40 wire, we are */
+ /* If the controller thinks we are 40 wire, we are. */
if (ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_PATA40)
return 1;
- /* If the controller thinks we are 80 wire, we are */
+
+ /* If the controller thinks we are 80 wire, we are. */
if (ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_PATA80 || ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA)
return 0;
- /* If the system is known to be 40 wire short cable (eg laptop),
- then we allow 80 wire modes even if the drive isn't sure */
+
+ /* If the system is known to be 40 wire short cable (eg
+ * laptop), then we allow 80 wire modes even if the drive
+ * isn't sure.
+ */
if (ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT)
return 0;
- /* If the controller doesn't know we scan
- - Note: We look for all 40 wire detects at this point.
- Any 80 wire detect is taken to be 80 wire cable
- because
- - In many setups only the one drive (slave if present)
- will give a valid detect
- - If you have a non detect capable drive you don't
- want it to colour the choice
- */
+ /* If the controller doesn't know, we scan.
+ *
+ * Note: We look for all 40 wire detects at this point. Any
+ * 80 wire detect is taken to be 80 wire cable because
+ * - in many setups only the one drive (slave if present) will
+ * give a valid detect
+ * - if you have a non detect capable drive you don't want it
+ * to colour the choice
+ */
ata_port_for_each_link(link, ap) {
ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, link) {
- if (!ata_is_40wire(dev))
+ if (ata_dev_enabled(dev) && !ata_is_40wire(dev))
return 0;
}
}
Index: work/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -603,6 +603,9 @@ void ata_scsi_error(struct Scsi_Host *ho
ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, link) {
int devno = dev->devno;
+ if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev))
+ continue;
+
ehc->saved_xfer_mode[devno] = dev->xfer_mode;
if (ata_ncq_enabled(dev))
ehc->saved_ncq_enabled |= 1 << devno;
@@ -2790,6 +2793,9 @@ int ata_set_mode(struct ata_link *link,
/* if data transfer is verified, clear DUBIOUS_XFER on ering top */
ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, link) {
+ if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev))
+ continue;
+
if (!(dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_DUBIOUS_XFER)) {
struct ata_ering_entry *ent;
@@ -2811,6 +2817,9 @@ int ata_set_mode(struct ata_link *link,
u8 saved_xfer_mode = ehc->saved_xfer_mode[dev->devno];
u8 saved_ncq = !!(ehc->saved_ncq_enabled & (1 << dev->devno));
+ if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev))
+ continue;
+
if (dev->xfer_mode != saved_xfer_mode ||
ata_ncq_enabled(dev) != saved_ncq)
dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_DUBIOUS_XFER;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-26 6:50 [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4] libata: fix device iteration bugs Tejun Heo
2008-10-26 6:51 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators Tejun Heo
2008-10-26 6:51 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 3/4] libata: when restoring SControl during detach do the PMP links first Tejun Heo
2008-10-26 6:52 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 4/4] libata: perform port detach in EH Tejun Heo
2008-10-28 4:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-26 14:31 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-27 9:06 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 9:39 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-27 10:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 11:58 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-28 4:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-30 1:25 ` Mark Lord
2008-10-30 1:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-26 10:47 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4] libata: fix device iteration bugs Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-27 9:07 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 10:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-10-28 3:57 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4 UPDATED] " Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49059F0B.3000508@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.