From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:25:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49090CFF.80101@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49068E9F.1040308@garzik.org>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> There currently are the following loop constructs.
>>
>> * __ata_port_for_each_link() for all available links
>> * ata_port_for_each_link() for edge links
>> * ata_link_for_each_dev() for all devices
>> * ata_link_for_each_dev_reverse() for all devices in reverse order
>>
>> Now there's a need for loop construct which is similar to
>> __ata_port_for_each_link() but iterates over PMP links before the host
>> link. Instead of adding another one with long name, do the following
>> cleanup.
>>
>> * Implement and export ata_link_next() and ata_dev_next() which take
>> @mode parameter and can be used to build custom loop.
>> * Implement ata_for_each_link() and ata_for_each_dev() which take
>> looping mode explicitly.
>>
>> The following iteration modes are implemented.
>>
>> * ATA_LITER_EDGE : loop over edge links
>> * ATA_LITER_HOST_FIRST : loop over all links, host link first
>> * ATA_LITER_PMP_FIRST : loop over all links, PMP links first
>>
>> * ATA_DITER_ENABLED : loop over enabled devices
>> * ATA_DITER_ENABLED_REVERSE : loop over enabled devices in reverse
>> order
>> * ATA_DITER_ALL : loop over all devices
>> * ATA_DITER_ALL_REVERSE : loop over all devices in reverse order
>>
>> This change removes exlicit device enabledness checks from many loops
>> and makes it clear which ones are iterated over in which direction.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 8 -
>> drivers/ata/ata_generic.c | 5 -
>> drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 19 +---
>> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 183
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 84 ++++++++-----------
>> drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c | 22 ++---
>> drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 22 ++---
>> drivers/ata/pata_it821x.c | 34 +++----
>> drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c | 14 +--
>> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c | 17 +--
>> drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c | 27 ++----
>> drivers/ata/pata_platform.c | 14 +--
>> drivers/ata/pata_rz1000.c | 16 +--
>> drivers/ata/sata_sil.c | 2 include/linux/libata.h |
>> 50 +++++++----
>> 15 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
>
> ACK... for 2.6.29. I think this is too much change for -rc2. It's a
> good idea though.
>
> Also, it could use more documentation than just the commit message...
> something that programmers can easily refer to (header file comment?)
..
Yeah. Especially a reminder of what "LITER" and "DITER" stand for! :)
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-30 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-26 6:50 [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4] libata: fix device iteration bugs Tejun Heo
2008-10-26 6:51 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators Tejun Heo
2008-10-26 6:51 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 3/4] libata: when restoring SControl during detach do the PMP links first Tejun Heo
2008-10-26 6:52 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 4/4] libata: perform port detach in EH Tejun Heo
2008-10-28 4:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-26 14:31 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-27 9:06 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 9:39 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-27 10:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 11:58 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-28 4:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-30 1:25 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2008-10-30 1:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-26 10:47 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4] libata: fix device iteration bugs Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-27 9:07 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 10:59 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4 UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2008-10-28 3:57 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49090CFF.80101@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.