* RE: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support [not found] ` <792f5f410808120830v311e0446kc8fddfb97d0b9ea6@mail.gmail.com> @ 2008-08-12 17:30 ` Daniel Schnell 2008-08-13 5:57 ` Tim Yamin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Daniel Schnell @ 2008-08-12 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Yamin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev Hi Tim, Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ... Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate the bestcomm data structures and functions. The only apparent difference is that you have a minimal data length of 2 bytes instead of 1. Does this make any difference as the bd_size will be filled with the correct length value anyway ? Moreover what is the difference between bcom_submit_next_buffer() and bcom_submit_next_buffer2() ? The same with bcom_retrieve_buffer() and bcom_retrieve_buffer2(). Why are these functions implemented unequally ? Best regards, Daniel Schnell. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-08-12 17:30 ` [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support Daniel Schnell @ 2008-08-13 5:57 ` Tim Yamin 2008-08-13 6:02 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Tim Yamin @ 2008-08-13 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Schnell; +Cc: linuxppc-dev On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Schnell <daniel.schnell@marel.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ... > > Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate > the bestcomm data structures and functions. The only apparent difference > is that you have a minimal data length of 2 bytes instead of 1. Does > this make any difference as the bd_size will be filled with the correct > length value anyway ? The "new" version of the patch does this the correct way. I just haven't back ported this to the 2.6.24 version that I sent you. Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-08-13 5:57 ` Tim Yamin @ 2008-08-13 6:02 ` Grant Likely 2008-08-13 6:06 ` Tim Yamin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2008-08-13 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Yamin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Tim Yamin <plasm@roo.me.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Schnell > <daniel.schnell@marel.com> wrote: >> Hi Tim, >> >> Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ... >> >> Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate >> the bestcomm data structures and functions. The only apparent difference >> is that you have a minimal data length of 2 bytes instead of 1. Does >> this make any difference as the bd_size will be filled with the correct >> length value anyway ? > > The "new" version of the patch does this the correct way. I just > haven't back ported this to the 2.6.24 version that I sent you. While on this topic; have you had a chance to address the comments you received on v2 of your patch? I'm keen to get your change merged in, but there are a few more things that need to be sorted out. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-08-13 6:02 ` Grant Likely @ 2008-08-13 6:06 ` Tim Yamin 2008-08-13 6:11 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Tim Yamin @ 2008-08-13 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: > While on this topic; have you had a chance to address the comments you > received on v2 of your patch? I'm keen to get your change merged in, > but there are a few more things that need to be sorted out. I'm still trying to determine whether the locking stuff is needed or not. I think ultimately it might be a bug caused by hardware problems at this end as opposed to silicon problems affecting everybody, but I won't have an answer regarding this for a while because new hardware needs to be prototyped to test out this theory. I think the patch can probably be resubmitted with the locking stuff removed, and the driver can be marked as experimental for everybody to try out: if people experience any corruption problems I'm sure they can speak up :-) Any objections? Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-08-13 6:06 ` Tim Yamin @ 2008-08-13 6:11 ` Grant Likely 2008-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Yamin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2008-08-13 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Yamin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:06:27AM +0100, Tim Yamin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: > > While on this topic; have you had a chance to address the comments you > > received on v2 of your patch? I'm keen to get your change merged in, > > but there are a few more things that need to be sorted out. > > I'm still trying to determine whether the locking stuff is needed or > not. I think ultimately it might be a bug caused by hardware problems > at this end as opposed to silicon problems affecting everybody, but I > won't have an answer regarding this for a while because new hardware > needs to be prototyped to test out this theory. > > I think the patch can probably be resubmitted with the locking stuff > removed, and the driver can be marked as experimental for everybody to > try out: if people experience any corruption problems I'm sure they > can speak up :-) > > Any objections? Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it up for -next if everything else looks good. g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-08-13 6:11 ` Grant Likely @ 2008-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Yamin 2008-09-15 5:54 ` Grant Likely 2008-11-11 14:04 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Tim Yamin @ 2008-08-13 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 268 bytes --] On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: > Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it > up for -next if everything else looks good. Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3. Thanks, Tim [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #2: bestcomm-ata-fixes.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-diff; name=bestcomm-ata-fixes.patch, Size: 4212 bytes --] 1) ata.h has dst_pa in the wrong place (needs to match what the BestComm task microcode in bcom_ata_task.c expects); fix it. 2) The BestComm ATA task priority was changed to maximum in bestcomm_priv.h; this fixes a deadlock issue I was experiencing when heavy DMA was occuring on both the ATA and Ethernet BestComm tasks, e.g. when downloading a large file over a LAN to disk. 3) The ATA BestComm driver uses bcom_ata_bd which is bigger than bcom_bd and this causes problems because the various bcom_... functions do not dereference the correct location. I've introduced bcom_get_bd which uses bcom_task.bd_size and this fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Tim Yamin <plasm@roo.me.uk> diff -urp linux-2.6.26-rc6/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/ata.h linux-2.6.26-rc6-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/ata.h --- linux-2.6.26-rc6/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/ata.h 2008-04-17 03:49:44.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.26-rc6-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/ata.h 2008-07-03 16:17:05.000000000 +0100 @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ struct bcom_ata_bd { u32 status; - u32 dst_pa; u32 src_pa; + u32 dst_pa; }; extern struct bcom_task * diff -urp linux-2.6.26-rc6/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.h linux-2.6.26-rc6-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.h --- linux-2.6.26-rc6/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.h 2008-04-17 03:49:44.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.26-rc6-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.h 2008-07-03 16:17:05.000000000 +0100 @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct bcom_task { unsigned int flags; int irq; - struct bcom_bd *bd; + void *bd; phys_addr_t bd_pa; void **cookie; unsigned short index; @@ -140,15 +140,29 @@ bcom_queue_full(struct bcom_task *tsk) } /** + * bcom_get_bd - Get a BD from the queue + * @tsk: The BestComm task structure + * index: Index of the BD to fetch + */ +static inline struct bcom_bd +*bcom_get_bd(struct bcom_task *tsk, unsigned int index) +{ + return tsk->bd + index * tsk->bd_size; +} + +/** * bcom_buffer_done - Checks if a BestComm * @tsk: The BestComm task structure */ static inline int bcom_buffer_done(struct bcom_task *tsk) { + struct bcom_bd *bd; if (bcom_queue_empty(tsk)) return 0; - return !(tsk->bd[tsk->outdex].status & BCOM_BD_READY); + + bd = bcom_get_bd(tsk, tsk->outdex); + return !(bd->status & BCOM_BD_READY); } /** @@ -160,16 +174,21 @@ bcom_buffer_done(struct bcom_task *tsk) static inline struct bcom_bd * bcom_prepare_next_buffer(struct bcom_task *tsk) { - tsk->bd[tsk->index].status = 0; /* cleanup last status */ - return &tsk->bd[tsk->index]; + struct bcom_bd *bd; + + bd = bcom_get_bd(tsk, tsk->index); + bd->status = 0; /* cleanup last status */ + return bd; } static inline void bcom_submit_next_buffer(struct bcom_task *tsk, void *cookie) { + struct bcom_bd *bd = bcom_get_bd(tsk, tsk->index); + tsk->cookie[tsk->index] = cookie; mb(); /* ensure the bd is really up-to-date */ - tsk->bd[tsk->index].status |= BCOM_BD_READY; + bd->status |= BCOM_BD_READY; tsk->index = _bcom_next_index(tsk); if (tsk->flags & BCOM_FLAGS_ENABLE_TASK) bcom_enable(tsk); @@ -179,10 +198,12 @@ static inline void * bcom_retrieve_buffer(struct bcom_task *tsk, u32 *p_status, struct bcom_bd **p_bd) { void *cookie = tsk->cookie[tsk->outdex]; + struct bcom_bd *bd = bcom_get_bd(tsk, tsk->outdex); + if (p_status) - *p_status = tsk->bd[tsk->outdex].status; + *p_status = bd->status; if (p_bd) - *p_bd = &tsk->bd[tsk->outdex]; + *p_bd = bd; tsk->outdex = _bcom_next_outdex(tsk); return cookie; } diff -urp linux-2.6.26-rc6/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h linux-2.6.26-rc6-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h --- linux-2.6.26-rc6/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h 2008-04-17 03:49:44.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.26-rc6-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h 2008-07-03 16:17:05.000000000 +0100 @@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ struct bcom_task_header { #define BCOM_IPR_SCTMR_1 2 #define BCOM_IPR_FEC_RX 6 #define BCOM_IPR_FEC_TX 5 -#define BCOM_IPR_ATA_RX 4 -#define BCOM_IPR_ATA_TX 3 +#define BCOM_IPR_ATA_RX 7 +#define BCOM_IPR_ATA_TX 7 #define BCOM_IPR_SCPCI_RX 2 #define BCOM_IPR_SCPCI_TX 2 #define BCOM_IPR_PSC3_RX 2 [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #3: pata_mpc52xx-add-dma.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-diff; name=pata_mpc52xx-add-dma.patch, Size: 18055 bytes --] This patch adds MDMA/UDMA support (using BestComm for DMA) on the MPC5200 platform. Patch requires the ATA BestComm fixes to function properly. Based heavily on previous work by Freescale (Bernard Kuhn, John Rigby) and Domen Puncer. Using a SanDisk Extreme IV CF card I get read speeds of approximately 26.70 MB/sec. Comments and testing would of course be very welcome. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Tim Yamin <plasm@roo.me.uk> diff -urp linux-2.6.27-rc3/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.c linux-2.6.27-rc3-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.c --- linux-2.6.27-rc3/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.c 2008-04-17 03:49:44.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.27-rc3-ata/arch/powerpc/sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.c 2008-07-03 16:17:05.000000000 +0100 @@ -330,11 +330,16 @@ bcom_engine_init(void) /* Init 'always' initiator */ out_8(&bcom_eng->regs->ipr[BCOM_INITIATOR_ALWAYS], BCOM_IPR_ALWAYS); + /* If ATA DMA is enabled, always turn prefetch off (it breaks things) */ +#ifndef CONFIG_PATA_MPC52xx_DMA /* Disable COMM Bus Prefetch on the original 5200; it's broken */ if ((mfspr(SPRN_SVR) & MPC5200_SVR_MASK) == MPC5200_SVR) { +#endif regval = in_be16(&bcom_eng->regs->PtdCntrl); out_be16(&bcom_eng->regs->PtdCntrl, regval | 1); +#ifndef CONFIG_PATA_MPC52xx_DMA } +#endif /* Init lock */ spin_lock_init(&bcom_eng->lock); diff -urp linux-2.6.27-rc3/drivers/ata/Kconfig linux-2.6.27-rc3-ata/drivers/ata/Kconfig --- linux-2.6.27-rc3/drivers/ata/Kconfig 2008-07-03 13:06:35.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.27-rc3-ata/drivers/ata/Kconfig 2008-07-03 16:16:32.000000000 +0100 @@ -462,6 +462,15 @@ config PATA_MPC52xx If unsure, say N. +config PATA_MPC52xx_DMA + bool "Freescale MPC52xx SoC internal IDE DMA (Experimental)" + depends on PATA_MPC52xx + help + This option enables support for DMA on the MPC52xx SoC PATA + controller. + + If unsure, say N. + config PATA_MPIIX tristate "Intel PATA MPIIX support" depends on PCI diff -urp linux-2.6.27-rc3/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c linux-2.6.27-rc3-ata/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c --- linux-2.6.27-rc3/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c 2008-07-03 13:06:35.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.27-rc3-ata/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c 2008-07-03 16:16:32.000000000 +0100 @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ * Copyright (C) 2006 Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com> * Copyright (C) 2003 Mipsys - Benjamin Herrenschmidt * + * UDMA support based on patches by Freescale (Bernard Kuhn, John Rigby), + * Domen Puncer and Tim Yamin. + * * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any * kind, whether express or implied. @@ -17,28 +20,47 @@ #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/libata.h> #include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/types.h> #include <asm/prom.h> #include <asm/mpc52xx.h> +#include <sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm.h> +#include <sysdev/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h> +#include <sysdev/bestcomm/ata.h> #define DRV_NAME "mpc52xx_ata" #define DRV_VERSION "0.1.2" - /* Private structures used by the driver */ struct mpc52xx_ata_timings { u32 pio1; u32 pio2; + u32 mdma1; + u32 mdma2; + u32 udma1; + u32 udma2; + u32 udma3; + u32 udma4; + u32 udma5; + int using_udma; }; struct mpc52xx_ata_priv { unsigned int ipb_period; struct mpc52xx_ata __iomem * ata_regs; + phys_addr_t ata_regs_pa; int ata_irq; struct mpc52xx_ata_timings timings[2]; int csel; + + /* DMA */ + struct bcom_task *dmatsk; + const struct udmaspec *udmaspec; + const struct mdmaspec *mdmaspec; + int mpc52xx_ata_dma_last_write; + int waiting_for_dma; }; @@ -53,6 +75,107 @@ static const int ataspec_ta[5] = { 35 #define CALC_CLKCYC(c,v) ((((v)+(c)-1)/(c))) +/* ======================================================================== */ + +/* ATAPI-4 MDMA specs (in clocks) */ +struct mdmaspec { + u32 t0M; + u32 td; + u32 th; + u32 tj; + u32 tkw; + u32 tm; + u32 tn; +}; + +static const struct mdmaspec mdmaspec66[3] = { + { .t0M = 32, .td = 15, .th = 2, .tj = 2, .tkw = 15, .tm = 4, .tn = 1 }, + { .t0M = 10, .td = 6, .th = 1, .tj = 1, .tkw = 4, .tm = 2, .tn = 1 }, + { .t0M = 8, .td = 5, .th = 1, .tj = 1, .tkw = 2, .tm = 2, .tn = 1 }, +}; + +static const struct mdmaspec mdmaspec132[3] = { + { .t0M = 64, .td = 29, .th = 3, .tj = 3, .tkw = 29, .tm = 7, .tn = 2 }, + { .t0M = 20, .td = 11, .th = 2, .tj = 1, .tkw = 7, .tm = 4, .tn = 1 }, + { .t0M = 16, .td = 10, .th = 2, .tj = 1, .tkw = 4, .tm = 4, .tn = 1 }, +}; + +/* ATAPI-4 UDMA specs (in clocks) */ +struct udmaspec { + u32 tcyc; + u32 t2cyc; + u32 tds; + u32 tdh; + u32 tdvs; + u32 tdvh; + u32 tfs; + u32 tli; + u32 tmli; + u32 taz; + u32 tzah; + u32 tenv; + u32 tsr; + u32 trfs; + u32 trp; + u32 tack; + u32 tss; +}; + +static const struct udmaspec udmaspec66[6] = { + { .tcyc = 8, .t2cyc = 16, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 5, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 16, .tli = 10, .tmli = 2, .taz = 1, .tzah = 2, .tenv = 2, + .tsr = 3, .trfs = 5, .trp = 11, .tack = 2, .tss = 4, + }, + { .tcyc = 5, .t2cyc = 11, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 4, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 14, .tli = 10, .tmli = 2, .taz = 1, .tzah = 2, .tenv = 2, + .tsr = 2, .trfs = 5, .trp = 9, .tack = 2, .tss = 4, + }, + { .tcyc = 4, .t2cyc = 8, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 3, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 12, .tli = 10, .tmli = 2, .taz = 1, .tzah = 2, .tenv = 2, + .tsr = 2, .trfs = 4, .trp = 7, .tack = 2, .tss = 4, + }, + { .tcyc = 3, .t2cyc = 6, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 2, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 9, .tli = 7, .tmli = 2, .taz = 1, .tzah = 2, .tenv = 2, + .tsr = 2, .trfs = 4, .trp = 7, .tack = 2, .tss = 4, + }, + { .tcyc = 2, .t2cyc = 4, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 1, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 8, .tli = 8, .tmli = 2, .taz = 1, .tzah = 2, .tenv = 2, + .tsr = 2, .trfs = 4, .trp = 7, .tack = 2, .tss = 4, + }, + { .tcyc = 2, .t2cyc = 2, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 1, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 6, .tli = 5, .tmli = 2, .taz = 1, .tzah = 2, .tenv = 2, + .tsr = 2, .trfs = 4, .trp = 6, .tack = 2, .tss = 4, + }, +}; + +static const struct udmaspec udmaspec132[6] = { + { .tcyc = 15, .t2cyc = 31, .tds = 2, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 10, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 30, .tli = 20, .tmli = 3, .taz = 2, .tzah = 3, .tenv = 3, + .tsr = 7, .trfs = 10, .trp = 22, .tack = 3, .tss = 7, + }, + { .tcyc = 10, .t2cyc = 21, .tds = 2, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 7, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 27, .tli = 20, .tmli = 3, .taz = 2, .tzah = 3, .tenv = 3, + .tsr = 4, .trfs = 10, .trp = 17, .tack = 3, .tss = 7, + }, + { .tcyc = 6, .t2cyc = 12, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 5, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 23, .tli = 20, .tmli = 3, .taz = 2, .tzah = 3, .tenv = 3, + .tsr = 3, .trfs = 8, .trp = 14, .tack = 3, .tss = 7, + }, + { .tcyc = 7, .t2cyc = 12, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 3, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 15, .tli = 13, .tmli = 3, .taz = 2, .tzah = 3, .tenv = 3, + .tsr = 3, .trfs = 8, .trp = 14, .tack = 3, .tss = 7, + }, + { .tcyc = 2, .t2cyc = 5, .tds = 0, .tdh = 0, .tdvs = 1, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 16, .tli = 14, .tmli = 2, .taz = 1, .tzah = 2, .tenv = 2, + .tsr = 2, .trfs = 7, .trp = 13, .tack = 2, .tss = 6, + }, + { .tcyc = 3, .t2cyc = 6, .tds = 1, .tdh = 1, .tdvs = 1, .tdvh = 1, + .tfs = 12, .tli = 10, .tmli = 3, .taz = 2, .tzah = 3, .tenv = 3, + .tsr = 3, .trfs = 7, .trp = 12, .tack = 3, .tss = 7, + }, +}; + +/* ======================================================================== */ /* Bit definitions inside the registers */ #define MPC52xx_ATA_HOSTCONF_SMR 0x80000000UL /* State machine reset */ @@ -66,6 +189,7 @@ static const int ataspec_ta[5] = { 35 #define MPC52xx_ATA_HOSTSTAT_WERR 0x01000000UL /* Write Error */ #define MPC52xx_ATA_FIFOSTAT_EMPTY 0x01 /* FIFO Empty */ +#define MPC52xx_ATA_FIFOSTAT_ERROR 0x40 /* FIFO Error */ #define MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_WRITE 0x01 /* Write DMA */ #define MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_READ 0x02 /* Read DMA */ @@ -75,6 +199,8 @@ static const int ataspec_ta[5] = { 35 #define MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_FR 0x20 /* FIFO Reset */ #define MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_HUT 0x40 /* Host UDMA burst terminate */ +#define MAX_DMA_BUFFERS 128 +#define MAX_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE 0x20000u /* Structure of the hardware registers */ struct mpc52xx_ata { @@ -165,6 +294,41 @@ mpc52xx_ata_compute_pio_timings(struct m return 0; } +static int +mpc52xx_ata_compute_mdma_timings(struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv, int dev, int speed) +{ + struct mpc52xx_ata_timings *timing = &priv->timings[dev]; + const struct mdmaspec *s = &priv->mdmaspec[speed]; + + if (speed < 0 || speed > 2) + return -EINVAL; + + timing->mdma1 = (s->t0M << 24) | (s->td << 16) | (s->tkw << 8) | (s->tm); + timing->mdma2 = (s->th << 24) | (s->tj << 16) | (s->tn << 8); + timing->using_udma = 0; + + return 0; +} + +static int +mpc52xx_ata_compute_udma_timings(struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv, int dev, int speed) +{ + struct mpc52xx_ata_timings *timing = &priv->timings[dev]; + const struct udmaspec *s = &priv->udmaspec[speed]; + + if (speed < 0 || speed > 2) + return -EINVAL; + + timing->udma1 = (s->t2cyc << 24) | (s->tcyc << 16) | (s->tds << 8) | (s->tdh); + timing->udma2 = (s->tdvs << 24) | (s->tdvh << 16) | (s->tfs << 8) | (s->tli); + timing->udma3 = (s->tmli << 24) | (s->taz << 16) | (s->tenv << 8) | (s->tsr); + timing->udma4 = (s->tss << 24) | (s->trfs << 16) | (s->trp << 8) | (s->tack); + timing->udma5 = (s->tzah << 24); + timing->using_udma = 1; + + return 0; +} + static void mpc52xx_ata_apply_timings(struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv, int device) { @@ -173,14 +337,13 @@ mpc52xx_ata_apply_timings(struct mpc52xx out_be32(®s->pio1, timing->pio1); out_be32(®s->pio2, timing->pio2); - out_be32(®s->mdma1, 0); - out_be32(®s->mdma2, 0); - out_be32(®s->udma1, 0); - out_be32(®s->udma2, 0); - out_be32(®s->udma3, 0); - out_be32(®s->udma4, 0); - out_be32(®s->udma5, 0); - + out_be32(®s->mdma1, timing->mdma1); + out_be32(®s->mdma2, timing->mdma2); + out_be32(®s->udma1, timing->udma1); + out_be32(®s->udma2, timing->udma2); + out_be32(®s->udma3, timing->udma3); + out_be32(®s->udma4, timing->udma4); + out_be32(®s->udma5, timing->udma5); priv->csel = device; } @@ -245,6 +408,29 @@ mpc52xx_ata_set_piomode(struct ata_port mpc52xx_ata_apply_timings(priv, adev->devno); } static void +mpc52xx_ata_set_dmamode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev) +{ + struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = ap->host->private_data; + int rv; + + if (adev->dma_mode >= XFER_UDMA_0) { + int dma = adev->dma_mode - XFER_UDMA_0; + rv = mpc52xx_ata_compute_udma_timings(priv, adev->devno, dma); + } else { + int dma = adev->dma_mode - XFER_MW_DMA_0; + rv = mpc52xx_ata_compute_mdma_timings(priv, adev->devno, dma); + } + + if (rv) { + dev_alert(ap->dev, + "Trying to select invalid DMA mode %d\n", + adev->dma_mode); + return; + } + + mpc52xx_ata_apply_timings(priv, adev->devno); +} +static void mpc52xx_ata_dev_select(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int device) { struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = ap->host->private_data; @@ -255,16 +441,187 @@ mpc52xx_ata_dev_select(struct ata_port * ata_sff_dev_select(ap,device); } +static int +mpc52xx_ata_build_dmatable(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ + struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap; + struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = ap->host->private_data; + unsigned int read = !(qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE), si; + struct scatterlist *sg; + int count = 0; + + if (read) + bcom_ata_rx_prepare(priv->dmatsk); + else + bcom_ata_tx_prepare(priv->dmatsk); + + for_each_sg(qc->sg, sg, qc->n_elem, si) { + dma_addr_t cur_addr = sg_dma_address(sg); + u32 cur_len = sg_dma_len(sg); + + while (cur_len) { + unsigned int tc = min(cur_len, MAX_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE); + struct bcom_ata_bd *bd = (struct bcom_ata_bd *) bcom_prepare_next_buffer(priv->dmatsk); + + if (read) { + bd->status = tc; + bd->src_pa = (__force u32) priv->ata_regs_pa + + offsetof(struct mpc52xx_ata, fifo_data); + bd->dst_pa = (__force u32) cur_addr; + } else { + bd->status = tc; + bd->src_pa = (__force u32) cur_addr; + bd->dst_pa = (__force u32) priv->ata_regs_pa + + offsetof(struct mpc52xx_ata, fifo_data); + } + + bcom_submit_next_buffer(priv->dmatsk, NULL); + + cur_addr += tc; + cur_len -= tc; + count++; + + if (count > MAX_DMA_BUFFERS) { + dev_alert(ap->dev, "dma table" + "too small\n"); + goto use_pio_instead; + } + } + } + return 1; + + use_pio_instead: + bcom_ata_reset_bd(priv->dmatsk); + return 0; +} + +static void +mpc52xx_bmdma_setup(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ + struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap; + struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = ap->host->private_data; + struct mpc52xx_ata __iomem *regs = priv->ata_regs; + + unsigned int read = !(qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE); + u8 dma_mode; + + if (!mpc52xx_ata_build_dmatable(qc)) + dev_alert(ap->dev, "%s: %i, return 1?\n", + __func__, __LINE__); + + /* Check FIFO is OK... */ + if(in_8(&priv->ata_regs->fifo_status) & MPC52xx_ATA_FIFOSTAT_ERROR) + dev_alert(ap->dev, "%s: FIFO error detected: 0x%02x!\n", + __func__, in_8(&priv->ata_regs->fifo_status)); + + if (read) { + dma_mode = MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_IE | MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_READ | + MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_FE; + + /* Setup FIFO if direction changed */ + if (priv->mpc52xx_ata_dma_last_write != 0) { + priv->mpc52xx_ata_dma_last_write = 0; + + /* Configure FIFO with granularity to 7 */ + out_8(®s->fifo_control, 7); + out_be16(®s->fifo_alarm, 128); + + /* Set FIFO Reset bit (FR) */ + out_8(®s->dma_mode, MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_FR); + } + } else { + dma_mode = MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_IE | MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_WRITE; + + /* Setup FIFO if direction changed */ + if (priv->mpc52xx_ata_dma_last_write != 1) { + priv->mpc52xx_ata_dma_last_write = 1; + + /* Configure FIFO with granularity to 4 */ + out_8(®s->fifo_control, 4); + out_be16(®s->fifo_alarm, 128); + } + } + + if (priv->timings[qc->dev->devno].using_udma) + dma_mode |= MPC52xx_ATA_DMAMODE_UDMA; + + out_8(®s->dma_mode, dma_mode); + priv->waiting_for_dma = ATA_DMA_ACTIVE; + + ata_wait_idle(ap); + ap->ops->sff_exec_command(ap, &qc->tf); +} + +static void +mpc52xx_bmdma_start(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ + struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap; + struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = ap->host->private_data; + + bcom_set_task_auto_start(priv->dmatsk->tasknum, priv->dmatsk->tasknum); + bcom_enable(priv->dmatsk); +} + +static void +mpc52xx_bmdma_stop(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ + struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap; + struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = ap->host->private_data; + + bcom_disable(priv->dmatsk); + bcom_ata_reset_bd(priv->dmatsk); + priv->waiting_for_dma = 0; + + /* Check FIFO is OK... */ + if(in_8(&priv->ata_regs->fifo_status) & MPC52xx_ATA_FIFOSTAT_ERROR) + dev_alert(ap->dev, "%s: FIFO error detected: 0x%02x!\n", + __func__, in_8(&priv->ata_regs->fifo_status)); +} + +static u8 +mpc52xx_bmdma_status(struct ata_port *ap) +{ + struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = ap->host->private_data; + + /* Check FIFO is OK... */ + if(in_8(&priv->ata_regs->fifo_status) & MPC52xx_ATA_FIFOSTAT_ERROR) { + dev_alert(ap->dev, "%s: FIFO error detected: 0x%02x!\n", + __func__, in_8(&priv->ata_regs->fifo_status)); + return priv->waiting_for_dma | ATA_DMA_ERR; + } + + return priv->waiting_for_dma; +} + +static irqreturn_t +mpc52xx_ata_task_irq(int irq, void *vpriv) +{ + struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv = vpriv; + while (bcom_buffer_done(priv->dmatsk)) + bcom_retrieve_buffer(priv->dmatsk, NULL, NULL); + + priv->waiting_for_dma |= ATA_DMA_INTR; + + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + static struct scsi_host_template mpc52xx_ata_sht = { ATA_PIO_SHT(DRV_NAME), }; static struct ata_port_operations mpc52xx_ata_port_ops = { .inherits = &ata_sff_port_ops, - .sff_dev_select = mpc52xx_ata_dev_select, - .cable_detect = ata_cable_40wire, + .set_piomode = mpc52xx_ata_set_piomode, - .post_internal_cmd = ATA_OP_NULL, + .set_dmamode = mpc52xx_ata_set_dmamode, + .sff_dev_select = mpc52xx_ata_dev_select, + + .bmdma_setup = mpc52xx_bmdma_setup, + .bmdma_start = mpc52xx_bmdma_start, + .bmdma_stop = mpc52xx_bmdma_stop, + .bmdma_status = mpc52xx_bmdma_status, + + .qc_prep = ata_noop_qc_prep, }; static int __devinit @@ -281,9 +643,11 @@ mpc52xx_ata_init_one(struct device *dev, ap = host->ports[0]; ap->flags |= ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS; - ap->pio_mask = 0x1f; /* Up to PIO4 */ - ap->mwdma_mask = 0x00; /* No MWDMA */ - ap->udma_mask = 0x00; /* No UDMA */ + ap->pio_mask = ATA_PIO4; /* Up to PIO4 */ +#ifdef CONFIG_PATA_MPC52xx_DMA + ap->mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2; /* Up to MWDMA2 */ + ap->udma_mask = ATA_UDMA2; /* Up to UDMA2 */ +#endif ap->ops = &mpc52xx_ata_port_ops; host->private_data = priv; @@ -333,7 +697,7 @@ mpc52xx_ata_probe(struct of_device *op, int ata_irq; struct mpc52xx_ata __iomem *ata_regs; struct mpc52xx_ata_priv *priv; - int rv; + int rv, ret, task_irq; /* Get ipb frequency */ ipb_freq = mpc52xx_find_ipb_freq(op->node); @@ -389,8 +753,32 @@ mpc52xx_ata_probe(struct of_device *op, priv->ipb_period = 1000000000 / (ipb_freq / 1000); priv->ata_regs = ata_regs; + priv->ata_regs_pa = res_mem.start; priv->ata_irq = ata_irq; priv->csel = -1; + priv->mpc52xx_ata_dma_last_write = -1; + + if (ipb_freq/1000000 == 66) { + priv->mdmaspec = mdmaspec66; + priv->udmaspec = udmaspec66; + } else { + priv->mdmaspec = mdmaspec132; + priv->udmaspec = udmaspec132; + } + + priv->dmatsk = bcom_ata_init(MAX_DMA_BUFFERS, MAX_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE); + if (!priv->dmatsk) { + dev_alert(&op->dev, "Failed to initialize BestComm task!\n"); + rv = -ENOMEM; + goto err; + } + + task_irq = bcom_get_task_irq(priv->dmatsk); + ret = request_irq(task_irq, &mpc52xx_ata_task_irq, IRQF_DISABLED, + "ATA task", priv); + if (ret) + dev_alert(&op->dev, "request_irq failed with: " + "%i\n", ret); /* Init the hw */ rv = mpc52xx_ata_hw_init(priv); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Yamin @ 2008-09-15 5:54 ` Grant Likely 2008-10-29 15:34 ` Matt Sealey 2008-11-11 14:04 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2008-09-15 5:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Yamin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Bienert, Shawn On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Tim Yamin <plasm@roo.me.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: >> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it >> up for -next if everything else looks good. > > Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3. Hi Tim, I finally got a chance to try out your patches on my lite5200 board. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get it to work easily. I'm very early in the debugging this issue, but I thought I'd send you my results in case you've seen it before. I've tried this with both an STEC 1GB CF and a Transcend Ultra industrial 1GB CF card. When the patch is enabled, Linux boots to the point of probing the ATA bus. The first attempt to probe uses UDMA/33 which ends in a timeout. Second attempt limits it to UDMA/25 which also times out. Third attempt falls back to PIO4 mode which then succeeds and the boot process continues. I haven't dug into the details of MPC5200 UDMA support yet, but I'd like to know if you have any ideas. Cheers, g. Full boot log below: U-Boot 1.3.4-rc2 (Aug 1 2008 - 14:11:20) CPU: MPC5200B v2.2, Core v1.4 at 462 MHz Bus 132 MHz, IPB 132 MHz, PCI 33 MHz Board: Freescale Lite5200B I2C: 85 kHz, ready DRAM: 256 MB FLASH: 32 MB PCI: Bus Dev VenId DevId Class Int 00 1a 1057 5809 0680 00 In: serial Out: serial Err: serial Net: FEC ETHERNET IDE: Bus 0: OK Device 0: Model: TRANSCEND Firm: 20070418 Ser#: 0 521143E8 Type: Hard Disk Capacity: 971.5 MB = 0.9 GB (1989792 x 512) Device 1: Model: Firm: Ser#: Type: # 1F # Capacity: not available Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 => boot Using FEC ETHERNET device TFTP from server 192.168.0.200; our IP address is 192.168.0.70 Filename 'mpc5200/uImage.gcl'. Load address: 0x400000 Loading: ################################################################# ############################# done Bytes transferred = 1376680 (1501a8 hex) Using FEC ETHERNET device TFTP from server 192.168.0.200; our IP address is 192.168.0.70 Filename 'mpc5200/lite5200b.dtb'. Load address: 0x3f0000 Loading: # done Bytes transferred = 8192 (2000 hex) ## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 00400000 ... Image Name: Linux-2.6.27-rc6-00038-gc03fbd9 Created: 2008-09-14 3:16:24 UTC Image Type: PowerPC Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed) Data Size: 1376616 Bytes = 1.3 MB Load Address: 00000000 Entry Point: 00000000 Verifying Checksum ... OK Uncompressing Kernel Image ... OK ## Flattened Device Tree blob at 003f0000 Booting using the fdt blob at 0x3f0000 [ 0.000000] Using lite5200 machine description [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.27-rc6-00038-gc03fbd9 (grant@trillian) (gcc version 4.0.0 (DENX ELDK 4.1 4.0.0)) #465 Sat Sep 13 21:15:54 MDT 2008 [ 0.000000] PCI host bridge /pci@f0000d00 (primary) ranges: [ 0.000000] MEM 0x0000000080000000..0x000000009fffffff -> 0x0000000080000000 Prefetch [ 0.000000] MEM 0x00000000a0000000..0x00000000afffffff -> 0x00000000a0000000 [ 0.000000] IO 0x00000000b0000000..0x00000000b0ffffff -> 0x0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] Zone PFN ranges: [ 0.000000] DMA 0x00000000 -> 0x00010000 [ 0.000000] Normal 0x00010000 -> 0x00010000 [ 0.000000] Movable zone start PFN for each node [ 0.000000] early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges [ 0.000000] 0: 0x00000000 -> 0x00010000 [ 0.000000] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 65024 [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: root=/dev/nfs rw nfsroot=192.168.0.200:/home/srv/nfs/gdc/lite5200-1 ip=192.168.0.70:192.168.0.200:192.168.0.1:255.255.255.0:lite5200-1:eth0:off console=ttyPSC0,115200 [ 0.000000] MPC52xx PIC is up and running! [ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 10, 4096 bytes) [ 0.000000] clocksource: timebase mult[79364d9] shift[22] registered [ 0.000194] console [ttyPSC0] enabled [ 0.120005] Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) [ 0.128964] Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) [ 0.166748] Memory: 256572k/262144k available (2740k kernel code, 5272k reserved, 108k data, 108k bss, 168k init) [ 0.177420] SLUB: Genslabs=12, HWalign=32, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1 [ 0.185307] Calibrating delay loop... 65.79 BogoMIPS (lpj=131584) [ 0.280159] Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 [ 0.288690] net_namespace: 288 bytes [ 0.293054] NET: Registered protocol family 16 [ 0.314694] PCI: Probing PCI hardware [ 0.319804] bus: 00 index 0 io port: [ffffff, 100c03f2000] [ 0.325470] bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [800000009fffffff, a0b] [ 0.331081] bus: 00 index 2 mmio: [a0000000afffffff, a4b] [ 0.336808] DMA: MPC52xx BestComm driver [ 0.341125] DMA: MPC52xx BestComm engine @f0001200 ok ! [ 0.355586] SCSI subsystem initialized [ 0.376841] NET: Registered protocol family 2 [ 0.415732] IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) [ 0.423336] TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) [ 0.431208] TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) [ 0.438151] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 8192) [ 0.444701] TCP reno registered [ 0.459823] NET: Registered protocol family 1 [ 0.504368] msgmni has been set to 501 [ 0.508420] io scheduler noop registered [ 0.512499] io scheduler anticipatory registered (default) [ 0.518146] io scheduler deadline registered [ 0.522741] io scheduler cfq registered [ 0.984815] Generic RTC Driver v1.07 [ 0.989504] Serial: MPC52xx PSC UART driver [ 0.994153] f0002000.serial: ttyPSC0 at MMIO 0xf0002000 (irq = 129) is a MPC52xx PSC [ 1.021517] brd: module loaded [ 1.033964] loop: module loaded [ 1.057979] mpc52xx MII bus: probed [ 1.063689] net eth0: Using PHY at MDIO address 0 [ 1.069486] Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods [ 1.076496] ata: MPC52xx IDE/ATA libata driver [ 1.081946] scsi0 : mpc52xx_ata [ 1.086095] ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 ata_regs 0xf0003a00 irq 135 [ 1.255960] ata1.00: ATA-4: TRANSCEND, 20070418, max UDMA/66 [ 1.261807] ata1.00: 1989792 sectors, multi 0: LBA [ 1.279847] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33 [ 1.284902] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA TRANSCEND 2007 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [ 1.294794] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 1989792 512-byte hardware sectors (1019 MB) [ 1.302014] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off [ 1.307411] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [ 1.317467] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 1989792 512-byte hardware sectors (1019 MB) [ 1.324683] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off [ 1.330081] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [ 1.339489] sda:<3>ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen [ 31.345893] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 4096 in [ 31.345905] res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout) [ 31.360881] ata1.00: status: { DRDY } [ 31.364705] ata1: soft resetting link [ 31.547846] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33 [ 31.552225] ata1: EH complete [ 61.551658] ata1.00: limiting speed to UDMA/25:PIO4 [ 61.556708] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen [ 61.563983] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 4096 in [ 61.563993] res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout) [ 61.578959] ata1.00: status: { DRDY } [ 61.582776] ata1: soft resetting link [ 61.763845] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/25 [ 61.768223] ata1: EH complete [ 91.767668] ata1.00: limiting speed to PIO4 [ 91.772012] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen [ 91.779287] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 4096 in [ 91.779297] res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout) [ 91.794272] ata1.00: status: { DRDY } [ 91.798094] ata1: soft resetting link [ 91.979846] ata1.00: configured for PIO4 [ 91.983958] ata1: EH complete [ 91.988286] sda1 sda2 [ 91.992885] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk [ 91.998678] i2c /dev entries driver [ 92.008333] TCP cubic registered [ 92.011711] NET: Registered protocol family 17 [ 92.017539] RPC: Registered udp transport module. [ 92.022418] RPC: Registered tcp transport module. [ 92.536899] net eth0: attached phy 0 to driver LXT971 [ 93.543913] IP-Config: Complete: [ 93.547047] device=eth0, addr=192.168.0.70, mask=255.255.255.0, gw=192.168.0.1, [ 93.554973] host=lite5200-1, domain=, nis-domain=(none), [ 93.560881] bootserver=192.168.0.200, rootserver=192.168.0.200, rootpath= [ 93.568846] Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 192.168.0.200 [ 95.535725] PHY: f0003000:00 - Link is Up - 100/Full [ 103.576944] Looking up port of RPC 100005/1 on 192.168.0.200 [ 108.628289] VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem). [ 108.633152] Freeing unused kernel memory: 168k init Mount failed for selinuxfs on /selinux: No such file or directory modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.27-rc6-00038-gc03fbd9/modules.dep: No such file or directory modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.27-rc6-00038-gc03fbd9/modules.dep: No such file or directory INIT: version 2.86 booting Setting the system clock. Timed out waiting for time change. Unable to set System Clock to: Thu Jan 1 00:01:51 UTC 1970 (warning). Activating swap...done. Setting the system clock. Timed out waiting for time change. Unable to set System Clock to: Thu Jan 1 00:01:53 UTC 1970 (warning). Cleaning up ifupdown.... Loading kernel modules...FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.27-rc6-00038-gc03fbd9/modules.dep: No such file or directory Checking file systems...fsck 1.41.1 (01-Sep-2008) dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN /dev/sda1: 12 files, 5665/15569 clusters done. Setting kernel variables (/etc/sysctl.conf)...done. Mounting local filesystems...done. Activating swapfile swap...done. Setting up networking.... Configuring network interfaces...done. Starting portmap daemon.... Starting NFS common utilities: statd. INIT: Entering runlevel: 2 Starting system log daemon.... Starting kernel log daemon.... Starting OpenBSD Secure Shell server: sshd. Starting NFS common utilities: statd. Starting NTP server: ntpd. Starting periodic command scheduler: crond. [ 122.655831] warning: `ntpd' uses 32-bit capabilities (legacy support in use) Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid lite5200-1 ttyPSC0 lite5200-1 login: Connection closed by foreign host. grant@gdc-sandbox:~$ -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-09-15 5:54 ` Grant Likely @ 2008-10-29 15:34 ` Matt Sealey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Matt Sealey @ 2008-10-29 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely; +Cc: Tim Yamin, linuxppc-dev, Bienert, Shawn Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Tim Yamin <plasm@roo.me.uk> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: >>> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it >>> up for -next if everything else looks good. >> Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3. > > Hi Tim, > > I finally got a chance to try out your patches on my lite5200 board. > Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get it to work easily. I'm very early > in the debugging this issue, but I thought I'd send you my results in > case you've seen it before. I've tried this with both an STEC 1GB CF > and a Transcend Ultra industrial 1GB CF card. [snip] Grant, Tim, Any chance of this being picked up even though it "doesn't work"? I'm going to be rolling a couple kernels this weekend (2.6.27.4 for Efika, ADS512101, 8610HPCN and 8641DHPCD) and I'll patch this in and see what happens and give some more test data (since my Efika is nice and trashed it won't matter if I trash it some more). We at Genesi still hold by the fact that ATA DMA is irrevocably broken but hold some bittersweet hope that Freescale might fix it after the fact in some useless future revision, the biggest problem is that if nobody writes a driver for it, nobody experiences the problem! Once the patch is in maybe someone will be willing to use the BestComm-assisted PIO idea as implemented in the bplan 2.6.19 kernel and compare results? -- Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Yamin 2008-09-15 5:54 ` Grant Likely @ 2008-11-11 14:04 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 2008-11-11 14:35 ` Matt Sealey 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2008-11-11 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Yamin, Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev Tim, Grant, I have tested the patch on our MPC5200B based board with Kingston Elite = Pro CF-card and it worked fine with DMA2. I have port the patch back to = 2.6.24.7 Kernel and I can't detect problems our errors, even with big = files (40 mB) over FEC wich I save to card . We get performance up to = 10,5mB/s which is near to the max. speed. Greetings Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Hans Lehmann Softwareentwicklung Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de Ritter Elektronik GmbH Leverkuser Stra=DFe 65 D-42897 Remscheid www.ritter-elektronik.de Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhausen HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=3Dritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs.org = [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=3Dritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs.o= rg] Im Auftrag von Tim Yamin Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2008 11:07 An: Grant Likely Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Betreff: [WW Spam: medium] Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely = <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: > Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it = > up for -next if everything else looks good. Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3. Thanks, Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-11-11 14:04 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2008-11-11 14:35 ` Matt Sealey 2008-11-11 15:04 ` AW: " Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Matt Sealey @ 2008-11-11 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik); +Cc: Tim Yamin, linuxppc-dev Oddly I built 2.6.27.2 with the patch and the Efika "waited" for a disk to appear and didn't get anywhere. If I set libata.dma=0 then it complained about missing symbols (but not with it enabled!). This was a clean SUSE kernel from Factory, with only the ATA patch applied with a few hand-merges (pata_mpc52xx.c has had a line of whitespace removed at some point, but otherwise identical). Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) wrote: > Tim, Grant, > > I have tested the patch on our MPC5200B based board with Kingston Elite Pro CF-card and it worked fine with DMA2. I have port the patch back to 2.6.24.7 Kernel and I can't detect problems our errors, even with big files (40 mB) over FEC wich I save to card . We get performance up to 10,5mB/s which is near to the max. speed. > > Greetings > > > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > Hans Lehmann > Softwareentwicklung > > Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 > Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 > e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de > > > > Ritter Elektronik GmbH > Leverkuser Straße 65 > D-42897 Remscheid > www.ritter-elektronik.de > > Geschäftsführer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhausen > HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=ritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs.org [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=ritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs.org] Im Auftrag von Tim Yamin > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2008 11:07 > An: Grant Likely > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Betreff: [WW Spam: medium] Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: >> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it >> up for -next if everything else looks good. > > Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev -- Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* AW: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-11-11 14:35 ` Matt Sealey @ 2008-11-11 15:04 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 2008-11-11 16:16 ` Matt Sealey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2008-11-11 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Sealey; +Cc: Tim Yamin, linuxppc-dev We take a vanilla kernel with rt11 patches from Ingo Mollnar. Here are the section of my boot messages ata: MPC52xx IDE/ATA libata driver scsi0 : mpc52xx_ata ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 ata_regs 0xf0003a00 irq 135 ata1.00: ATA-0: ELITE PRO CF CARD 1GB, 20070131, max MWDMA2 ata1.00: 2031120 sectors, multi 0: LBA ata1.00: configured for MWDMA2 ata1.00: configured for MWDMA2 ata1: EH complete scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ELITE PRO CF CAR 2007 PQ: 0 = ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2031120 512-byte hardware sectors (1040 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't = support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2031120 512-byte hardware sectors (1040 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't = support DPO or FUA sda: sda1=20 Greetings Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Hans Lehmann Softwareentwicklung Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de Ritter Elektronik GmbH Leverkuser Stra=DFe 65 D-42897 Remscheid www.ritter-elektronik.de Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhausen HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Matt Sealey [mailto:neko@genesi-usa.com] Im Auftrag von Matt Sealey Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. November 2008 15:36 An: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) Cc: Tim Yamin; Grant Likely; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support Oddly I built 2.6.27.2 with the patch and the Efika "waited" for a disk = to appear and didn't get anywhere. If I set libata.dma=3D0 then it = complained about missing symbols (but not with it enabled!). This was a clean SUSE kernel from Factory, with only the ATA patch = applied with a few hand-merges (pata_mpc52xx.c has had a line of = whitespace removed at some point, but otherwise identical). Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) wrote: > Tim, Grant, >=20 > I have tested the patch on our MPC5200B based board with Kingston = Elite Pro CF-card and it worked fine with DMA2. I have port the patch = back to 2.6.24.7 Kernel and I can't detect problems our errors, even = with big files (40 mB) over FEC wich I save to card . We get performance = up to 10,5mB/s which is near to the max. speed. >=20 > Greetings >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen >=20 > Hans Lehmann > Softwareentwicklung >=20 > Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 > Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 > e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de >=20 >=20 >=20 > Ritter Elektronik GmbH > Leverkuser Stra=DFe 65 > D-42897 Remscheid > www.ritter-elektronik.de >=20 > Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader Sitz der=20 > Gesellschaft: Oberhausen HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 >=20 >=20 > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: = linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=3Dritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs.org=20 > = [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=3Dritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs. > org] Im Auftrag von Tim Yamin > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2008 11:07 > An: Grant Likely > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Betreff: [WW Spam: medium] Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support >=20 > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely = <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: >> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick=20 >> it up for -next if everything else looks good. >=20 > Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Tim >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev -- Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: AW: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-11-11 15:04 ` AW: " Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2008-11-11 16:16 ` Matt Sealey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Matt Sealey @ 2008-11-11 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik); +Cc: Tim Yamin, linuxppc-dev Hmm even with DMA built in my disk (Seagate 5400.8) still "configured" for PIO4. This is probably my fault. Tim, could you respin the patch anyway since it doesn't apply cleanly to the 2.6.27 kernel? :) This did work for me once but we were still using a SUSE kernel (from 11.0) to patch it onto and another interrupt controller patch crippled performance so it wasn't a really good test.. -- Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) wrote: > We take a vanilla kernel with rt11 patches from Ingo Mollnar. > > Here are the section of my boot messages > > ata: MPC52xx IDE/ATA libata driver > scsi0 : mpc52xx_ata > ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 ata_regs 0xf0003a00 irq 135 > ata1.00: ATA-0: ELITE PRO CF CARD 1GB, 20070131, max MWDMA2 > ata1.00: 2031120 sectors, multi 0: LBA > ata1.00: configured for MWDMA2 > ata1.00: configured for MWDMA2 > ata1: EH complete > scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ELITE PRO CF CAR 2007 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2031120 512-byte hardware sectors (1040 MB) > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2031120 512-byte hardware sectors (1040 MB) > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA > sda: sda1 > > Greetings > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > Hans Lehmann > Softwareentwicklung > > Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 > Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 > e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de > > > > Ritter Elektronik GmbH > Leverkuser Straße 65 > D-42897 Remscheid > www.ritter-elektronik.de > > Geschäftsführer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhausen > HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Matt Sealey [mailto:neko@genesi-usa.com] Im Auftrag von Matt Sealey > Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. November 2008 15:36 > An: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) > Cc: Tim Yamin; Grant Likely; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support > > Oddly I built 2.6.27.2 with the patch and the Efika "waited" for a disk to appear and didn't get anywhere. If I set libata.dma=0 then it complained about missing symbols (but not with it enabled!). > > This was a clean SUSE kernel from Factory, with only the ATA patch applied with a few hand-merges (pata_mpc52xx.c has had a line of whitespace removed at some point, but otherwise identical). > > Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) wrote: >> Tim, Grant, >> >> I have tested the patch on our MPC5200B based board with Kingston Elite Pro CF-card and it worked fine with DMA2. I have port the patch back to 2.6.24.7 Kernel and I can't detect problems our errors, even with big files (40 mB) over FEC wich I save to card . We get performance up to 10,5mB/s which is near to the max. speed. >> >> Greetings >> >> >> >> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen >> >> Hans Lehmann >> Softwareentwicklung >> >> Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 >> Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 >> e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de >> >> >> >> Ritter Elektronik GmbH >> Leverkuser Straße 65 >> D-42897 Remscheid >> www.ritter-elektronik.de >> >> Geschäftsführer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader Sitz der >> Gesellschaft: Oberhausen HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=ritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs.org >> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+hans.lehmann=ritter-elektronik.de@ozlabs. >> org] Im Auftrag von Tim Yamin >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2008 11:07 >> An: Grant Likely >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >> Betreff: [WW Spam: medium] Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support >> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: >>> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick >>> it up for -next if everything else looks good. >> Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linuxppc-dev mailing list >> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > > -- > Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> > Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <AclPDG6qSkF9cHawTOKR6zBfDIjvgg==>]
* AW: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support @ 2008-11-25 14:45 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 2008-11-25 15:19 ` Matt Sealey 2008-12-20 7:18 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2008-11-25 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Yamin, Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev Tim, Grant, just an info. Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate = a transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I have = read something like that). A restart of FEC don't work. =20 But no I figured out, if I connect to the other ethernet port of our = board (natsemi) the FEC will awake to life again, if I initiate a new = transaction over natsemi. This seems a little oddly to me. Cheers =20 Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Hans Lehmann Softwareentwicklung Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de =20 Ritter Elektronik GmbH Leverkuser Stra=DFe 65 D-42897 Remscheid www.ritter-elektronik.de <http://www.ritter-elektronik.de/start.html>=20 Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhausen HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-11-25 14:45 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2008-11-25 15:19 ` Matt Sealey 2008-11-25 15:35 ` AW: " Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 2008-12-20 7:18 ` Grant Likely 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Matt Sealey @ 2008-11-25 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik); +Cc: Tim Yamin, linuxppc-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1012 bytes --] On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) < hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de> wrote: > Tim, Grant, > > just an info. > > Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate a > transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I have read > something like that). A restart of FEC don't work. > But no I figured out, if I connect to the other ethernet port of our board > (natsemi) the FEC will awake to life again, if I initiate a new transaction > over natsemi. This seems a little oddly to me. > Hi guys, We tried to get the SUSE guys to push the patch into openSUSE 11.1 release and the tests came back negative here too with regards to FEC support; for some odd reason, it does this; https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445856#c10 There is some weird interaction here, but I can't imagine what it might be. Tim, did you ever see any ethernet problems like this? -- Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1458 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* AW: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-11-25 15:19 ` Matt Sealey @ 2008-11-25 15:35 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2008-11-25 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Sealey, Tim Yamin, Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev Tim, Grant=20 =20 here are some more information.=20 I think there is a also a problem with memory after FEC crasched. =20 root@EL392:~ free total used free shared buffers Mem: 127100 26424 100676 0 432 Swap: 0 0 0 Total: 127100 26424 100676 root@EL392:~ root@EL392:~ root@EL392:~ ifdown eth0 net eth0: queues didn't drain net eth0: tx: index: 10, outdex: 6 net eth0: rx: index: 117, outdex: 118 root@EL392:~ ifup eth0 net eth0: attached phy 0 to driver Generic PHY root@EL392:~ freePHY: f0003000:00 - Link is Up - 100/Full root@EL392:~ free total used free shared buffers Mem: 127100 35028 92072 0 760 Swap: 0 0 0 Total: 127100 35028 92072 =20 Cheers Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Hans Lehmann Softwareentwicklung Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de = <mailto:hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de>=20 Ritter Elektronik GmbH Leverkuser Stra=DFe 65 D-42897 Remscheid www.ritter-elektronik.de <http://www.ritter-elektronik.de/start.html>=20 Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhausen HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 =20 ________________________________ Von: Matt Sealey [mailto:matt@genesi-usa.com]=20 Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. November 2008 16:19 An: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) Cc: Tim Yamin; Grant Likely; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) = <hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de> wrote: Tim, Grant, =09 just an info. =09 Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I = initiate a transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I = have read something like that). A restart of FEC don't work. But no I figured out, if I connect to the other ethernet port of our = board (natsemi) the FEC will awake to life again, if I initiate a new = transaction over natsemi. This seems a little oddly to me. =09 Hi guys, We tried to get the SUSE guys to push the patch into openSUSE 11.1 = release and the tests came back negative here too with regards to FEC = support; for some odd reason, it does this; https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D445856#c10=20 There is some weird interaction here, but I can't imagine what it might = be. Tim, did you ever see any ethernet problems like this? --=20 Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-11-25 14:45 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 2008-11-25 15:19 ` Matt Sealey @ 2008-12-20 7:18 ` Grant Likely 2009-01-05 9:25 ` AW: " Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2008-12-20 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik); +Cc: Tim Yamin, linuxppc-dev On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) <hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de> wrote: > Tim, Grant, > > just an info. > > Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate a transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I have read something like that). A restart of FEC don't work. > But no I figured out, if I connect to the other ethernet port of our board (natsemi) the FEC will awake to life again, if I initiate a new transaction over natsemi. This seems a little oddly to me. Hans, what ATA modes do you see this problem in? UDMA? MWDMA? Or does just having the patch applied but still using PIO mode expose the problem? Thanks, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* AW: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support 2008-12-20 7:18 ` Grant Likely @ 2009-01-05 9:25 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) @ 2009-01-05 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely; +Cc: Tim Yamin, linuxppc-dev > Hans, what ATA modes do you see this problem in? UDMA? MWDMA? Or = does just having the patch applied but still using PIO mode expose the = problem? This problem occurs in MWDMA 2 mode. Happy new year Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Hans Lehmann Softwareentwicklung Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520 Fax +49 (0)2191-67-703408 e-mail hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de Ritter Elektronik GmbH Leverkuser Stra=DFe 65 D-42897 Remscheid www.ritter-elektronik.de Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Manfred A. Wagner, Dr. Uwe Baader Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhausen HRB 17168 Duisburg / USt-ID DE 814009849 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-05 9:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB03202F4F@is-hdq-exchange.marel.net>
[not found] ` <DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB03203863@is-hdq-exchange.marel.net>
[not found] ` <792f5f410808111319m20d6e09bi8e9782da1fdd4aab@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB0320387D@is-hdq-exchange.marel.net>
[not found] ` <792f5f410808111431g8fafba1n3b10468da0d165bf@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB03203A7B@is-hdq-exchange.marel.net>
[not found] ` <792f5f410808120643md72e679o39692c4bfa3f285e@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB03203A94@is-hdq-exchange.marel.net>
[not found] ` <792f5f410808120730j7b4be4f2n7a40de880178ccca@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB03203ADC@is-hdq-exchange.marel.net>
[not found] ` <792f5f410808120830v311e0446kc8fddfb97d0b9ea6@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-12 17:30 ` [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support Daniel Schnell
2008-08-13 5:57 ` Tim Yamin
2008-08-13 6:02 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-13 6:06 ` Tim Yamin
2008-08-13 6:11 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Yamin
2008-09-15 5:54 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-29 15:34 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-11 14:04 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
2008-11-11 14:35 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-11 15:04 ` AW: " Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
2008-11-11 16:16 ` Matt Sealey
[not found] <AclPDG6qSkF9cHawTOKR6zBfDIjvgg==>
2008-11-25 14:45 ` Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
2008-11-25 15:19 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 15:35 ` AW: " Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
2008-12-20 7:18 ` Grant Likely
2009-01-05 9:25 ` AW: " Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.