From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/13] fs/xfs: Remove redundant test
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:47:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494E7329.2090309@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812211737180.9555@pc-004.diku.dk>
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> In fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, bp is tested for being NULL just a few lines
> above.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r exists@
> local idexpression x;
> expression E;
> position p1,p2;
> @@
>
> if (x@p1 = NULL || ...) { ... when forall
> return ...; }
> ... when != \(x=E\|x--\|x++\|--x\|++x\|x-=E\|x+=E\|x|=E\|x&=E\|&x\)
> (
> x@p2 = NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> // another path to the test that is not through p1?
> @s exists@
> local idexpression r.x;
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> @@
>
> ... when != x@p1
> (
> x@p2 = NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> @fix depends on !s@
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> expression x,E;
> statement S1,S2;
> @@
>
> (
> - if ((x@p2 != NULL) || ...)
> S1
> |
> - if ((x@p2 = NULL) && ...) S1
> |
> - BUG_ON(x@p2 = NULL);
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Looks good to me, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> ---
> var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/var/linuxes/linux-next/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> index 8ee2f8c..218829e 100644
> --- a/var/linuxes/linux-next/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> +++ b/var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
> return (flags & XFS_BUF_TRYLOCK) ?
> EAGAIN : XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
>
> - if ((bp != NULL) && (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0)) {
> + if (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0) {
> xfs_ioerror_alert("xfs_trans_read_buf", mp,
> bp, blkno);
> error = XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp);
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
> return error;
> }
> #ifdef DEBUG
> - if (xfs_do_error && (bp != NULL)) {
> + if (xfs_do_error) {
> if (xfs_error_target = target) {
> if (((xfs_req_num++) % xfs_error_mod) = 0) {
> xfs_buf_relse(bp);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/13] fs/xfs: Remove redundant test
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:47:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494E7329.2090309@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812211737180.9555@pc-004.diku.dk>
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> In fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, bp is tested for being NULL just a few lines
> above.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r exists@
> local idexpression x;
> expression E;
> position p1,p2;
> @@
>
> if (x@p1 == NULL || ...) { ... when forall
> return ...; }
> ... when != \(x=E\|x--\|x++\|--x\|++x\|x-=E\|x+=E\|x|=E\|x&=E\|&x\)
> (
> x@p2 == NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> // another path to the test that is not through p1?
> @s exists@
> local idexpression r.x;
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> @@
>
> ... when != x@p1
> (
> x@p2 == NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> @fix depends on !s@
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> expression x,E;
> statement S1,S2;
> @@
>
> (
> - if ((x@p2 != NULL) || ...)
> S1
> |
> - if ((x@p2 == NULL) && ...) S1
> |
> - BUG_ON(x@p2 == NULL);
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Looks good to me, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> ---
> var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/var/linuxes/linux-next/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> index 8ee2f8c..218829e 100644
> --- a/var/linuxes/linux-next/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> +++ b/var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
> return (flags & XFS_BUF_TRYLOCK) ?
> EAGAIN : XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
>
> - if ((bp != NULL) && (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0)) {
> + if (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0) {
> xfs_ioerror_alert("xfs_trans_read_buf", mp,
> bp, blkno);
> error = XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp);
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
> return error;
> }
> #ifdef DEBUG
> - if (xfs_do_error && (bp != NULL)) {
> + if (xfs_do_error) {
> if (xfs_error_target == target) {
> if (((xfs_req_num++) % xfs_error_mod) == 0) {
> xfs_buf_relse(bp);
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/13] fs/xfs: Remove redundant test
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:47:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494E7329.2090309@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812211737180.9555@pc-004.diku.dk>
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> In fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, bp is tested for being NULL just a few lines
> above.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r exists@
> local idexpression x;
> expression E;
> position p1,p2;
> @@
>
> if (x@p1 == NULL || ...) { ... when forall
> return ...; }
> ... when != \(x=E\|x--\|x++\|--x\|++x\|x-=E\|x+=E\|x|=E\|x&=E\|&x\)
> (
> x@p2 == NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> // another path to the test that is not through p1?
> @s exists@
> local idexpression r.x;
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> @@
>
> ... when != x@p1
> (
> x@p2 == NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> @fix depends on !s@
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> expression x,E;
> statement S1,S2;
> @@
>
> (
> - if ((x@p2 != NULL) || ...)
> S1
> |
> - if ((x@p2 == NULL) && ...) S1
> |
> - BUG_ON(x@p2 == NULL);
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Looks good to me, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> ---
> var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/var/linuxes/linux-next/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> index 8ee2f8c..218829e 100644
> --- a/var/linuxes/linux-next/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> +++ b/var/julia/linuxcopy/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
> return (flags & XFS_BUF_TRYLOCK) ?
> EAGAIN : XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
>
> - if ((bp != NULL) && (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0)) {
> + if (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0) {
> xfs_ioerror_alert("xfs_trans_read_buf", mp,
> bp, blkno);
> error = XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp);
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
> return error;
> }
> #ifdef DEBUG
> - if (xfs_do_error && (bp != NULL)) {
> + if (xfs_do_error) {
> if (xfs_error_target == target) {
> if (((xfs_req_num++) % xfs_error_mod) == 0) {
> xfs_buf_relse(bp);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-21 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-21 15:40 [PATCH 9/13] fs/xfs: Remove redundant test Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 15:40 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 15:40 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-12-21 16:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-12-21 16:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-12-21 16:36 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:36 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:36 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:38 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:38 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:38 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:45 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:45 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:45 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:47 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-12-21 16:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-12-21 16:47 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=494E7329.2090309@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.