From: Peter Klotz <peter.klotz@aon.at>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Roman Kononov <kernel@kononov.ftml.net>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:21:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49623384.2070801@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105064838.GA5209@wotan.suse.de>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> I believe this patch should solve it. Please test and confirm before
> I send it upstream.
My test successfully completed two times, writing a 900GB file in each run.
I used a patched 2.6.27.10 x86_64 kernel.
On an unpatched system this test usually fails before reaching 100GB.
Thank you for fixing this issue that quick.
Regards, Peter.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Klotz <peter.klotz@aon.at>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Roman Kononov <kernel@kononov.ftml.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:21:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49623384.2070801@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105064838.GA5209@wotan.suse.de>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> I believe this patch should solve it. Please test and confirm before
> I send it upstream.
My test successfully completed two times, writing a 900GB file in each run.
I used a patched 2.6.27.10 x86_64 kernel.
On an unpatched system this test usually fails before reaching 100GB.
Thank you for fixing this issue that quick.
Regards, Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-19 6:59 BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? Roman Kononov
2008-12-23 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-23 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-30 4:23 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-30 4:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-03 21:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-03 21:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-05 1:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 1:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 6:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 6:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 14:25 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 14:25 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 16:21 ` Peter Klotz [this message]
2009-01-05 16:21 ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-05 16:41 ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?) Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 16:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 16:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 18:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 18:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 18:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 2:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 2:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 2:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 2:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 8:38 ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-06 8:38 ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-06 8:38 ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-06 8:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 8:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 8:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 16:16 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-06 16:16 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-06 16:16 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 21:04 ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 21:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 21:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 21:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-14 11:23 ` BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? Guus Sliepen
2011-07-14 11:23 ` Guus Sliepen
2011-07-14 18:03 ` Peter Klotz
2011-07-14 18:03 ` Peter Klotz
2011-07-14 19:29 ` Guus Sliepen
2011-07-14 19:29 ` Guus Sliepen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49623384.2070801@aon.at \
--to=peter.klotz@aon.at \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel@kononov.ftml.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.