From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:39:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49635F17.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090106113543.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
>>> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> 06.01.09 12:35 >>>
>On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:53:04AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The others look like a tools side behavioral difference, as I never saw any
>> such. Is this problem sparc32-specific (I tested x86 and ia64 only)? What's
>> the binutils version used?
>
>2.18.50.0.6.
>
>And no, it's not tools side. What it is, AFAICT, is that sparc32 has
>LDFLAGS_vmlinux = -r, which leaves a metric arseload of relocs that
>wouldn't have survived into vmlinux otherwise. Look at .rela__ksymtab
>in .tmp_vmlinux1, for example...
That I think can only be taken care of by disallowing the stripping for that
arch, i.e. adding a negative dependency to the Kconfig option. Or can
anyone think of any other solution?
Jan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>, "Al Viro" <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@redhat.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:39:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49635F17.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090106113543.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
>>> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> 06.01.09 12:35 >>>
>On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:53:04AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The others look like a tools side behavioral difference, as I never saw any
>> such. Is this problem sparc32-specific (I tested x86 and ia64 only)? What's
>> the binutils version used?
>
>2.18.50.0.6.
>
>And no, it's not tools side. What it is, AFAICT, is that sparc32 has
>LDFLAGS_vmlinux = -r, which leaves a metric arseload of relocs that
>wouldn't have survived into vmlinux otherwise. Look at .rela__ksymtab
>in .tmp_vmlinux1, for example...
That I think can only be taken care of by disallowing the stripping for that
arch, i.e. adding a negative dependency to the Kconfig option. Or can
anyone think of any other solution?
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 18:19 ftrace breaks sparc64 build Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 18:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 19:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:42 ` [PATCH] sparc: make proces_ver_nack a bit more readable Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:23 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:23 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 19:54 ` ftrace breaks sparc64 build Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 19:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 21:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 21:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 21:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 21:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 22:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 22:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 22:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 22:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 23:11 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-05 23:11 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 9:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 9:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 4:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 4:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 9:45 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 9:45 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 18:32 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:32 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 19:01 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 19:01 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 19:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 19:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 20:02 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 20:02 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 20:30 ` [PATCH] module: clean up initialization of variable Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 20:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 22:59 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-05 22:59 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-06 1:22 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 1:34 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:48 ` ftrace breaks sparc64 build Al Viro
2009-01-05 19:48 ` Al Viro
2009-01-05 19:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 19:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 11:35 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 11:35 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 12:39 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2009-01-06 12:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 13:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 13:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 15:52 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 15:52 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 18:39 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:39 ` David Miller
2009-01-08 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-08 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49635F17.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.