* [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12399
Subject : USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-08 7:35 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fd9086a518d4f14213a32fe6c9ac17fabebbc1e
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123140019117968&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
@ 2009-01-11 11:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12399
Subject : USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date : 2009-01-08 7:35 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fd9086a518d4f14213a32fe6c9ac17fabebbc1e
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123140019117968&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
2009-01-11 11:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 21:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Levitsky @ 2009-01-11 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 12:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12399
> Subject : USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
> Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-08 7:35 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fd9086a518d4f14213a32fe6c9ac17fabebbc1e
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123140019117968&w=4
>
Happens here on aspire 5720G, and yes unloading ehci_hcd makes
suspend/resume work, otherwise system resumes immediately.
best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
> Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
> Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
Latest git pull still not fixed.
Jeff.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
@ 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
> Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
> Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
Latest git pull still not fixed.
Jeff.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <b6a2187b0901110557xb696d03n9a7c7acad122e561-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua
@ 2009-01-11 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Chua; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
> > Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
>
> Latest git pull still not fixed.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12402] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Beregalov, Christoph Hellwig,
Eric Sandeen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12402
Subject : 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-09 04:41 (3 days old)
References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/27548
Handled-By : Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Fisher, H. Peter Anvin,
Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Suresh Siddha,
venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, Venkatesh Pallipadi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track-M18mAb7Tlt0yCq4wW13eYl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Fisher, H. Peter Anvin,
Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Suresh Siddha, venkatesh.pallipadi,
Venkatesh Pallipadi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-14 7:38 ` Alexey Fisher
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-14 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, H. Peter Anvin,
Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Suresh Siddha
Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
> Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
> Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track-M18mAb7Tlt0yCq4wW13eYl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
> Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
There is no more warnings on the xorg start, but x server will completly
freeze on glxgears.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
@ 2009-01-14 7:38 ` Alexey Fisher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-14 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, H. Peter Anvin,
Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Suresh Siddha
Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
> Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
> Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
> Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
There is no more warnings on the xorg start, but x server will completly
freeze on glxgears.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <496D968C.4050405-M18mAb7Tlt0yCq4wW13eYl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>]
* RE: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
2009-01-14 7:38 ` Alexey Fisher
@ 2009-01-14 7:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh @ 2009-01-14 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Fisher, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, H. Peter Anvin,
Siddha, Suresh B, airlied-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alexey Fisher [mailto:bug-track-M18mAb7Tlt0yCq4wW13eYl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:39 PM
>To: Rafael J. Wysocki
>Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel Testers List; H. Peter
>Anvin; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Siddha, Suresh B
>Subject: Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86:
>PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
>
>Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and
>let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
>> Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT:
>implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
>> Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track-M18mAb7Tlt0yCq4wW13eYl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
>> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
>> First-Bad-Commit:
>http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.gi
>t;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
>> Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>kernel-testers" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>There is no more warnings on the xorg start, but x server will
>completly
>freeze on glxgears.
>
Yes. But, that is a different bug with DRM changes. This fix just unmasks the bug now.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Thanks,
Venki--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* RE: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
@ 2009-01-14 7:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh @ 2009-01-14 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Fisher, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, H. Peter Anvin,
Siddha, Suresh B, airlied@redhat.com
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alexey Fisher [mailto:bug-track@fisher-privat.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:39 PM
>To: Rafael J. Wysocki
>Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel Testers List; H. Peter
>Anvin; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Siddha, Suresh B
>Subject: Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86:
>PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
>
>Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and
>let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
>> Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT:
>implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
>> Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
>> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
>> First-Bad-Commit:
>http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.gi
>t;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
>> Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>kernel-testers" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>There is no more warnings on the xorg start, but x server will
>completly
>freeze on glxgears.
>
Yes. But, that is a different bug with DRM changes. This fix just unmasks the bug now.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Thanks,
Venki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Borntraeger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Borntraeger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-12 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-12 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The
problems has disappeared.
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
@ 2009-01-12 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-12 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The
problems has disappeared.
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200901121215.31749.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
2009-01-12 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2009-01-12 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-12 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 12 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
> > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
> > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
>
> Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The
> problems has disappeared.
Thanks for the update, the bug has been closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
@ 2009-01-12 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-12 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 12 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
> > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
> > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
>
> Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The
> problems has disappeared.
Thanks for the update, the bug has been closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200901121347.42799.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
2009-01-12 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-18 15:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-18 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Am Montag 12 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> On Monday 12 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
> > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
> > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
> >
> > Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The
> > problems has disappeared.
>
> Thanks for the update, the bug has been closed.
Since suspend/resume now works I have seen this problem again.
I dont know how to trigger this, but I have made several suspend/resume cycles
since yesterday:
[11182.292341] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
iwl_set_dynamic_key+0x4be/0x4d0()
[11182.292343] Hardware name: 64575GG
[11182.292344] no space for new kewModules linked in: psmouse
[11182.292349] Pid: 21185, comm: events/1 Not tainted
2.6.29-rc2-self-00004-g812c74b #164
[11182.292350] Call Trace:
[11182.292355] [<c014ccb7>] warn_slowpath+0x87/0xe0
[11182.292358] [<c036c66f>] iwl_send_cmd_async+0x3f/0x90
[11182.292360] [<c011f69a>] __switch_to+0xca/0x1d0
[11182.292363] [<c03711ef>] iwl_send_add_sta+0x7f/0x120
[11182.292366] [<c014666f>] finish_task_switch+0x1f/0xb0
[11182.292369] [<c05469ed>] schedule_timeout+0xbd/0xf0
[11182.292372] [<c0370fe0>] iwl_add_sta_callback+0x0/0x70
[11182.292374] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10
[11182.292377] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60
[11182.292379] [<c03720de>] iwl_set_dynamic_key+0x4be/0x4d0
[11182.292381] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10
[11182.292383] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60
[11182.292385] [<c0370e56>] iwl_find_station+0xd6/0x110
[11182.292388] [<c0373951>] iwl_scan_cancel_timeout+0x21/0x90
[11182.292390] [<c037576b>] iwl_mac_set_key+0x8b/0x160
[11182.292393] [<c03756e0>] iwl_mac_set_key+0x0/0x160
[11182.292395] [<c0530340>] __ieee80211_key_todo+0xd0/0x260
[11182.292398] [<c015e5b3>] queue_delayed_work_on+0xa3/0xd0
[11182.292400] [<c05305ef>] ieee80211_key_todo+0xf/0x20
[11182.292403] [<c015dd8b>] run_workqueue+0x6b/0x130
[11182.292405] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10
[11182.292407] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60
[11182.292409] [<c0530600>] key_todo+0x0/0x10
[11182.292412] [<c015ded8>] worker_thread+0x88/0xf0
[11182.292414] [<c01619d0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[11182.292417] [<c015de50>] worker_thread+0x0/0xf0
[11182.292419] [<c0161609>] kthread+0x39/0x70
[11182.292420] [<c01615d0>] kthread+0x0/0x70
[11182.292423] [<c01210d3>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[11182.292424] ---[ end trace 94103c51f16e0890 ]---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
@ 2009-01-18 15:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-18 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Am Montag 12 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> On Monday 12 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415
> > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
> > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > > Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4
> >
> > Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The
> > problems has disappeared.
>
> Thanks for the update, the bug has been closed.
Since suspend/resume now works I have seen this problem again.
I dont know how to trigger this, but I have made several suspend/resume cycles
since yesterday:
[11182.292341] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689
iwl_set_dynamic_key+0x4be/0x4d0()
[11182.292343] Hardware name: 64575GG
[11182.292344] no space for new kewModules linked in: psmouse
[11182.292349] Pid: 21185, comm: events/1 Not tainted
2.6.29-rc2-self-00004-g812c74b #164
[11182.292350] Call Trace:
[11182.292355] [<c014ccb7>] warn_slowpath+0x87/0xe0
[11182.292358] [<c036c66f>] iwl_send_cmd_async+0x3f/0x90
[11182.292360] [<c011f69a>] __switch_to+0xca/0x1d0
[11182.292363] [<c03711ef>] iwl_send_add_sta+0x7f/0x120
[11182.292366] [<c014666f>] finish_task_switch+0x1f/0xb0
[11182.292369] [<c05469ed>] schedule_timeout+0xbd/0xf0
[11182.292372] [<c0370fe0>] iwl_add_sta_callback+0x0/0x70
[11182.292374] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10
[11182.292377] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60
[11182.292379] [<c03720de>] iwl_set_dynamic_key+0x4be/0x4d0
[11182.292381] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10
[11182.292383] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60
[11182.292385] [<c0370e56>] iwl_find_station+0xd6/0x110
[11182.292388] [<c0373951>] iwl_scan_cancel_timeout+0x21/0x90
[11182.292390] [<c037576b>] iwl_mac_set_key+0x8b/0x160
[11182.292393] [<c03756e0>] iwl_mac_set_key+0x0/0x160
[11182.292395] [<c0530340>] __ieee80211_key_todo+0xd0/0x260
[11182.292398] [<c015e5b3>] queue_delayed_work_on+0xa3/0xd0
[11182.292400] [<c05305ef>] ieee80211_key_todo+0xf/0x20
[11182.292403] [<c015dd8b>] run_workqueue+0x6b/0x130
[11182.292405] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10
[11182.292407] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60
[11182.292409] [<c0530600>] key_todo+0x0/0x10
[11182.292412] [<c015ded8>] worker_thread+0x88/0xf0
[11182.292414] [<c01619d0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[11182.292417] [<c015de50>] worker_thread+0x0/0xf0
[11182.292419] [<c0161609>] kthread+0x39/0x70
[11182.292420] [<c01615d0>] kthread+0x0/0x70
[11182.292423] [<c01210d3>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[11182.292424] ---[ end trace 94103c51f16e0890 ]---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12416] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jan Beulich, Sam Ravnborg, Theodore Ts'o
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12416
Subject : Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-06 15:15 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123125495000603&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12400] git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dirk Hohndel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12400
Subject : git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup
Submitter : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-08 20:05 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123144520124853&w=4
Handled-By : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123152033725557&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar,
Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar,
Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 14:52 ` Alexey Fisher
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-11 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox,
Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
>
I just realised, this warning message normally should inculde DMI System
Product Name ( Hardware Name ), but my board do not support this filed (
it geve only "System Product Name" ) and use only DMI Board Product Name
instead. It should be "5LD2-VM".
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x480/0x6c2()
Hardware name: System Product Name
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Should be like:
Hradware name: P5LD2-VM
See my dmidecoe:
Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer: stem manufacturer
Product Name: System Product Name
Version: System Version
Serial Number: System Serial Number
UUID: [------------cuted out--------------]
Wake-up Type: PCI PME#
SKU Number: <BAD INDEX>
Family: <BAD INDEX>
Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Product Name: P5LD2-VM
Version: Rev 1.xx
Serial Number: MB-1234567890
Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Features:
Board is a hosting board
Board is replaceable
Location In Chassis: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Chassis Handle: 0x0003
Type: Motherboard
Contained Object Handles: 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
@ 2009-01-11 14:52 ` Alexey Fisher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-11 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox,
Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
>
I just realised, this warning message normally should inculde DMI System
Product Name ( Hardware Name ), but my board do not support this filed (
it geve only "System Product Name" ) and use only DMI Board Product Name
instead. It should be "5LD2-VM".
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x480/0x6c2()
Hardware name: System Product Name
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Should be like:
Hradware name: P5LD2-VM
See my dmidecoe:
Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer: stem manufacturer
Product Name: System Product Name
Version: System Version
Serial Number: System Serial Number
UUID: [------------cuted out--------------]
Wake-up Type: PCI PME#
SKU Number: <BAD INDEX>
Family: <BAD INDEX>
Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Product Name: P5LD2-VM
Version: Rev 1.xx
Serial Number: MB-1234567890
Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Features:
Board is a hosting board
Board is replaceable
Location In Chassis: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Chassis Handle: 0x0003
Type: Motherboard
Contained Object Handles: 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Rempel @ 2009-01-14 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox,
Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This warning was disabled in latest git.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
@ 2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Rempel @ 2009-01-14 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox,
Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This warning was disabled in latest git.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <496D95BA.4070304-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel
@ 2009-01-14 7:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-14 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Rempel
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Alan Cox, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
Am Mittwoch 14 Januar 2009 schrieb Alexey Rempel:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017
ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
> This warning was disabled in latest git.
Yes. After the discussion had a conclusion, I decided to to send a patch
myself and Jeff sent it to Linus.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0f79f7ad3e52b908786462cf5446ebe20fe14fa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
@ 2009-01-14 7:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-14 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Rempel
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Alan Cox, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
Am Mittwoch 14 Januar 2009 schrieb Alexey Rempel:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017
ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
> This warning was disabled in latest git.
Yes. After the discussion had a conclusion, I decided to to send a patch
myself and Jeff sent it to Linus.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0f79f7ad3e52b908786462cf5446ebe20fe14fa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200901140840.39202.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
2009-01-14 7:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2009-01-14 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-14 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Alexey Rempel, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Alan Cox, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 14 Januar 2009 schrieb Alexey Rempel:
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017
> ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
>
>
> > This warning was disabled in latest git.
>
> Yes. After the discussion had a conclusion, I decided to to send a patch
> myself and Jeff sent it to Linus.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0f79f7ad3e52b908786462cf5446ebe20fe14fa
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
@ 2009-01-14 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-14 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Alexey Rempel, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Alan Cox, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 14 Januar 2009 schrieb Alexey Rempel:
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017
> ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
>
>
> > This warning was disabled in latest git.
>
> Yes. After the discussion had a conclusion, I decided to to send a patch
> myself and Jeff sent it to Linus.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0f79f7ad3e52b908786462cf5446ebe20fe14fa
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Wang Chen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Drake, Jeff Chua, Phil Dibowitz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422
Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Drake, Jeff Chua, Phil Dibowitz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422
Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Drake,
Phil Dibowitz
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422
> Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
> Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4
Latest git pull still not fixed.
Jeff.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-01-11 14:08 ` Daniel Drake
[not found] ` <4969FD64.8040408-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 105+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Drake @ 2009-01-11 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua,
Phil Dibowitz
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422
> Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str
> Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4
The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault.
Jeff, do you even have that camera?
It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the
unusual_devs entry for it.
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12428] Build error on latest git
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Petr Titera
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
Subject : Build error on latest git
Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera-0E4lWjIyFdTrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera-0E4lWjIyFdTrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* [Bug #12427] cpumask change causes sparc build bustage
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Miller, Ingo Molnar, Mike Travis
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12427
Subject : cpumask change causes sparc build bustage
Submitter : David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-11 8:31 (1 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=588235bb53f2c215f0d4b08fd30b461fedc3338e
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166268013838&w=4
Handled-By : David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167571525706&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 13:46 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 13:46 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
` (6 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 2 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Ingo Molnar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> Regressions with patches
> ------------------------
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> Subject : Build error on latest git
> Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>
>
This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
is defined.
I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for x86
Attach patch is the solution for the time being
Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
Thanks
--
JSR
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-x86-mpparse.c-fix-compilation-error.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 747 bytes --]
From 8e7b0d4ea4458f9966c54551ac0bd79b34d5f935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:30:34 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: mpparse.c fix compilation error
Impact: fix compilation error
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
index 8385d4e..79dae60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/e820.h>
#include <asm/trampoline.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <mach_apic.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
--
1.5.6.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 13:46 ` 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > Regressions with patches
> > ------------------------
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> > Subject : Build error on latest git
> > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>
> This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
> is defined.
>
> I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
> x86
>
> Attach patch is the solution for the time being
>
> Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
yes, it already is - see below.
Ingo
----------------->
>From 8b5a33599c541cf5bf66304343d08ff2795d038b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:38:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix mpparse.c build error on latest git
Fix this by reintroducing asm/smp.h include in mpparse.c - later on
I will fix this by removing non-smp data from smp.h.
Reported-by: Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
index c0601c2..a649a4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/e820.h>
#include <asm/trampoline.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <mach_apic.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 13:46 ` 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > Regressions with patches
> > ------------------------
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> > Subject : Build error on latest git
> > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>
> This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
> is defined.
>
> I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
> x86
>
> Attach patch is the solution for the time being
>
> Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
yes, it already is - see below.
Ingo
----------------->
From 8b5a33599c541cf5bf66304343d08ff2795d038b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:38:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix mpparse.c build error on latest git
Fix this by reintroducing asm/smp.h include in mpparse.c - later on
I will fix this by removing non-smp data from smp.h.
Reported-by: Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
index c0601c2..a649a4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/e820.h>
#include <asm/trampoline.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <mach_apic.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > Regressions with patches
> > ------------------------
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> > Subject : Build error on latest git
> > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>
> This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
> is defined.
>
> I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
> x86
>
> Attach patch is the solution for the time being
>
> Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
yes, it already is - see below.
Ingo
----------------->
>From 8b5a33599c541cf5bf66304343d08ff2795d038b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:38:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix mpparse.c build error on latest git
Fix this by reintroducing asm/smp.h include in mpparse.c - later on
I will fix this by removing non-smp data from smp.h.
Reported-by: Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
index c0601c2..a649a4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/e820.h>
#include <asm/trampoline.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <mach_apic.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
(?)
@ 2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
[not found] ` <200901112001.00394.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 2 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > Regressions with patches
> > > ------------------------
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> > > Subject : Build error on latest git
> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
> >
> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
> > is defined.
> >
> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
> > x86
> >
> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
> >
> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
>
> yes, it already is - see below.
Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the
bug when it's merged.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
[not found] ` <200901112001.00394.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-13 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Ingo Molnar, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Andrew Morton
Hello Rafael,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Regressions with patches
>> > > ------------------------
>> > >
>> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
>> > > Subject : Build error on latest git
>> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
>> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
>> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
>> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>> >
>> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
>> > is defined.
>> >
>> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
>> > x86
>> >
>> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
>> >
>> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
>>
>> yes, it already is - see below.
>
> Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the
> bug when it's merged.
>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4884d8e6a05026ec906355436cea9dc1acb1d09e
--
JSR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread[parent not found: <200901112001.00394.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
[not found] ` <200901112001.00394.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-13 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
Hello Rafael,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Regressions with patches
>> > > ------------------------
>> > >
>> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
>> > > Subject : Build error on latest git
>> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera-0E4lWjIyFdTrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
>> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
>> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera-0E4lWjIyFdTrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
>> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>> >
>> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
>> > is defined.
>> >
>> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
>> > x86
>> >
>> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
>> >
>> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
>>
>> yes, it already is - see below.
>
> Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the
> bug when it's merged.
>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4884d8e6a05026ec906355436cea9dc1acb1d09e
--
JSR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-13 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
Hello Rafael,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Regressions with patches
>> > > ------------------------
>> > >
>> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
>> > > Subject : Build error on latest git
>> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
>> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
>> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
>> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>> >
>> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
>> > is defined.
>> >
>> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
>> > x86
>> >
>> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
>> >
>> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
>>
>> yes, it already is - see below.
>
> Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the
> bug when it's merged.
>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4884d8e6a05026ec906355436cea9dc1acb1d09e
--
JSR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
(?)
@ 2009-01-13 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-13 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Regressions with patches
> >> > > ------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> >> > > Subject : Build error on latest git
> >> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> >> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> >> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> >> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> >> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
> >> >
> >> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
> >> > is defined.
> >> >
> >> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
> >> > x86
> >> >
> >> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
> >> >
> >> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
> >>
> >> yes, it already is - see below.
> >
> > Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the
> > bug when it's merged.
> >
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4884d8e6a05026ec906355436cea9dc1acb1d09e
Thanks, the bug has been closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-01-13 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-13 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Ingo Molnar, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Andrew Morton
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Regressions with patches
> >> > > ------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> >> > > Subject : Build error on latest git
> >> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> >> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> >> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> >> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> >> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
> >> >
> >> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
> >> > is defined.
> >> >
> >> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
> >> > x86
> >> >
> >> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
> >> >
> >> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
> >>
> >> yes, it already is - see below.
> >
> > Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the
> > bug when it's merged.
> >
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4884d8e6a05026ec906355436cea9dc1acb1d09e
Thanks, the bug has been closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List,
Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > Regressions with patches
> > > ------------------------
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> > > Subject : Build error on latest git
> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
> >
> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
> > is defined.
> >
> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for
> > x86
> >
> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
> >
> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
>
> yes, it already is - see below.
Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the
bug when it's merged.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-11 13:46 ` 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-01-11 13:46 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
` (5 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Ingo Molnar,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> Regressions with patches
> ------------------------
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> Subject : Build error on latest git
> Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
>
>
This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP
is defined.
I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for x86
Attach patch is the solution for the time being
Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
Thanks
--
JSR
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-x86-mpparse.c-fix-compilation-error.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 747 bytes --]
From 8e7b0d4ea4458f9966c54551ac0bd79b34d5f935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:30:34 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: mpparse.c fix compilation error
Impact: fix compilation error
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
index 8385d4e..79dae60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/e820.h>
#include <asm/trampoline.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <mach_apic.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
--
1.5.6.6
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-11 13:46 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
` (4 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
I can trigger it too and it is pretty much resolved - false positive
WARN_ON() triggered by new (but correct) libata usage.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
> Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
> Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
> Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Should be solved by Venki's PAT fixes in tip/x86/urgent:
0e95c19: x86, pat: fix reserve_memtype() for legacy 1MB range
74edd61: x86 PAT: remove CPA WARN_ON for zero pte
e722dc8: x86 PAT: ioremap_wc should take resource_size_t parameter
b61e53c: x86 PAT: return compatible mapping to remap_pfn_range callers
e104ba3: x86 PAT: change track_pfn_vma_new to take pgprot_t pointer param
3cedb0d: x86 PAT: consolidate old memtype new memtype check into a function
e61304a: x86 PAT: remove PFNMAP type on track_pfn_vma_new() error
Soon to be sent to Linus.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz
` (3 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
> Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4
I can trigger it too and it is pretty much resolved - false positive
WARN_ON() triggered by new (but correct) libata usage.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
> Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
> Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4
> Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Should be solved by Venki's PAT fixes in tip/x86/urgent:
0e95c19: x86, pat: fix reserve_memtype() for legacy 1MB range
74edd61: x86 PAT: remove CPA WARN_ON for zero pte
e722dc8: x86 PAT: ioremap_wc should take resource_size_t parameter
b61e53c: x86 PAT: return compatible mapping to remap_pfn_range callers
e104ba3: x86 PAT: change track_pfn_vma_new to take pgprot_t pointer param
3cedb0d: x86 PAT: consolidate old memtype new memtype check into a function
e61304a: x86 PAT: remove PFNMAP type on track_pfn_vma_new() error
Soon to be sent to Linus.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz
2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz
` (2 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Heinz @ 2009-01-11 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me
> know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any
> of the entries below are invalid.
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12174
Subject : No backlight control on Samsung x360
I think this is a common bug on systems with a broken(?) bios, exposing wrong
driver names. With 2.6.27 it was at least possible to control the backlight
over the NVID interface.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz
@ 2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz
2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz
2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Heinz @ 2009-01-11 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me
> know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any
> of the entries below are invalid.
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12174
Subject : No backlight control on Samsung x360
I think this is a common bug on systems with a broken(?) bios, exposing wrong
driver names. With 2.6.27 it was at least possible to control the backlight
over the NVID interface.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz
2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Heinz @ 2009-01-11 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me
> know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any
> of the entries below are invalid.
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12174
Subject : No backlight control on Samsung x360
I think this is a common bug on systems with a broken(?) bios, exposing wrong
driver names. With 2.6.27 it was at least possible to control the backlight
over the NVID interface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz
@ 2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz
20 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Heinz @ 2009-01-11 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Network Development, Linux PM List, Kernel Testers List,
Linux SCSI List, Linux ACPI
Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me
> know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any
> of the entries below are invalid.
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12174
Subject : No backlight control on Samsung x360
I think this is a common bug on systems with a broken(?) bios, exposing wrong
driver names. With 2.6.27 it was at least possible to control the backlight
over the NVID interface.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread