From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net,
Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
Bob Copeland <me@bob>
Subject: Re: [TIP] BUG kmalloc-4096: Poison overwritten (ath5k_rx_skb_alloc)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:47:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A14956.7080500@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090222122036.GC5538@silver.sucs.org>
On 22.2.2009 13:20, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:01:21PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> The unsupported jumbo message might be a clue. When we jump to the n=
ext:
>> label, the buffer is at the end of the list in software, while in
>> hardware it isn't. In theory, we might hit the bug with rx buffers
>> exhaustion, because the test (bf_last =3D=3D bf) doesn't work as exp=
ected then.
>
> This seems to be happening somewhat regularly now - I've got a small
> collections of the warnings (I'll include them below in case they are
> any help):
[...]
> [11207.741042] Object 0xd7060000: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b=
6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> [11207.741071] Object 0xd7060010: 80 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00=
30 ab 1a 32 3f ....=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF.0=AB.2?
All of them are almost the same scenario, the last one was data not=20
beacon, but it's irrelevant. And previously I was wrong, we move the=20
buffer to the end even on hardware side. Thanks so far, I personally se=
e=20
no reason for this to happen yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net,
Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
Bob Copeland <me@bob>
Subject: Re: [TIP] BUG kmalloc-4096: Poison overwritten (ath5k_rx_skb_alloc)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:47:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A14956.7080500@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090222122036.GC5538@silver.sucs.org>
On 22.2.2009 13:20, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:01:21PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> The unsupported jumbo message might be a clue. When we jump to the next:
>> label, the buffer is at the end of the list in software, while in
>> hardware it isn't. In theory, we might hit the bug with rx buffers
>> exhaustion, because the test (bf_last == bf) doesn't work as expected then.
>
> This seems to be happening somewhat regularly now - I've got a small
> collections of the warnings (I'll include them below in case they are
> any help):
[...]
> [11207.741042] Object 0xd7060000: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> [11207.741071] Object 0xd7060010: 80 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 30 ab 1a 32 3f ....ÿÿÿÿÿÿ.0«.2?
All of them are almost the same scenario, the last one was data not
beacon, but it's irrelevant. And previously I was wrong, we move the
buffer to the end even on hardware side. Thanks so far, I personally see
no reason for this to happen yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-22 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-22 11:18 [TIP] BUG kmalloc-4096: Poison overwritten (ath5k_rx_skb_alloc) Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-22 11:18 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-22 12:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 12:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 12:20 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-22 12:20 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-22 12:47 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2009-02-22 12:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 14:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 14:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 17:02 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-22 17:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 19:27 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 19:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 20:18 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-22 20:27 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 20:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 21:56 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 22:21 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-22 23:20 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-23 15:35 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-23 16:03 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-02-23 16:15 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-02-23 16:21 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-23 16:27 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-02-23 16:30 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-23 16:41 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-02-23 16:44 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-23 16:16 ` pat-lkml
2009-02-23 16:20 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-02-23 22:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-23 22:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-23 23:08 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-02-24 13:58 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-24 21:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-25 14:01 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-25 14:01 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-26 1:06 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-26 20:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-26 21:05 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-26 13:59 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-26 17:03 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-02 17:34 ` [ath5k-devel] " Bob Copeland
2009-03-02 17:34 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-03 4:12 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-03 20:03 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-04 12:07 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-06 9:42 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-07 4:47 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-07 8:04 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-07 13:34 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-08 3:09 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-08 9:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-03-08 16:10 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-10 0:43 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-10 8:19 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-12 6:10 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-12 6:10 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-13 9:52 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-13 12:28 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-20 13:14 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-29 14:24 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-29 15:14 ` Bob Copeland
2009-03-31 8:30 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-05-13 21:44 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-05-13 21:44 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-05-15 4:09 ` Bob Copeland
2009-05-18 10:05 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-05-22 9:39 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-05-22 12:06 ` Bob Copeland
2009-05-26 21:10 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-06-28 20:23 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-07-14 2:24 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-26 1:11 ` Bob Copeland
2009-02-22 20:17 ` Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A14956.7080500@gmail.com \
--to=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=me@bob \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
--cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.