* [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock
@ 2009-03-12 1:47 Li Zefan
[not found] ` <49B869B7.1090108-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-12 2:43 ` Paul Menage
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2009-03-12 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Paul Menage, LKML, Linux Containers
Since we are in cgroup write handler, so the cgrp is valid, so we
don't have to hold cgroup_mutex when calling cgroup_task_count().
One similar example is in cgroup_tasks_open().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/cgroup_debug.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
index daca620..0c92d79 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
@@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ static u64 taskcount_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft)
{
u64 count;
- cgroup_lock();
count = cgroup_task_count(cont);
- cgroup_unlock();
return count;
}
--
1.5.4.rc3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread[parent not found: <49B869B7.1090108-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock
[not found] ` <49B869B7.1090108-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-03-12 2:43 ` Paul Menage
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menage @ 2009-03-12 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zefan; +Cc: Linux Containers, Andrew Morton, LKML
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Since we are in cgroup write handler, so the cgrp is valid, so we
> don't have to hold cgroup_mutex when calling cgroup_task_count().
> One similar example is in cgroup_tasks_open().
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
(Although this conflicts with a patch that I'm about to send out that
moves the code from cgroup_debug.c into cgroup.c to allow internal
details to be reported in the debug.* files.)
> ---
> kernel/cgroup_debug.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
> index daca620..0c92d79 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
> @@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ static u64 taskcount_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft)
> {
> u64 count;
>
> - cgroup_lock();
> count = cgroup_task_count(cont);
> - cgroup_unlock();
> return count;
> }
>
> --
> 1.5.4.rc3
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock
2009-03-12 1:47 [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock Li Zefan
[not found] ` <49B869B7.1090108-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-03-12 2:43 ` Paul Menage
2009-03-12 2:49 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <6599ad830903111943u2799333dh680470f9daa6ccbb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menage @ 2009-03-12 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zefan; +Cc: Andrew Morton, LKML, Linux Containers
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Since we are in cgroup write handler, so the cgrp is valid, so we
> don't have to hold cgroup_mutex when calling cgroup_task_count().
> One similar example is in cgroup_tasks_open().
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
(Although this conflicts with a patch that I'm about to send out that
moves the code from cgroup_debug.c into cgroup.c to allow internal
details to be reported in the debug.* files.)
> ---
> kernel/cgroup_debug.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
> index daca620..0c92d79 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
> @@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ static u64 taskcount_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft)
> {
> u64 count;
>
> - cgroup_lock();
> count = cgroup_task_count(cont);
> - cgroup_unlock();
> return count;
> }
>
> --
> 1.5.4.rc3
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock
2009-03-12 2:43 ` Paul Menage
@ 2009-03-12 2:49 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <6599ad830903111943u2799333dh680470f9daa6ccbb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2009-03-12 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Menage; +Cc: Andrew Morton, LKML, Linux Containers
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Since we are in cgroup write handler, so the cgrp is valid, so we
>> don't have to hold cgroup_mutex when calling cgroup_task_count().
>> One similar example is in cgroup_tasks_open().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
>
> (Although this conflicts with a patch that I'm about to send out that
> moves the code from cgroup_debug.c into cgroup.c to allow internal
> details to be reported in the debug.* files.)
>
or let cgroup.c #include <cgroup_debug.c> ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread[parent not found: <6599ad830903111943u2799333dh680470f9daa6ccbb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock
[not found] ` <6599ad830903111943u2799333dh680470f9daa6ccbb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-03-12 2:49 ` Li Zefan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2009-03-12 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Menage; +Cc: Linux Containers, Andrew Morton, LKML
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Since we are in cgroup write handler, so the cgrp is valid, so we
>> don't have to hold cgroup_mutex when calling cgroup_task_count().
>> One similar example is in cgroup_tasks_open().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
>
> Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> (Although this conflicts with a patch that I'm about to send out that
> moves the code from cgroup_debug.c into cgroup.c to allow internal
> details to be reported in the debug.* files.)
>
or let cgroup.c #include <cgroup_debug.c> ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock
@ 2009-03-12 1:47 Li Zefan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2009-03-12 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Linux Containers, Paul Menage, LKML
Since we are in cgroup write handler, so the cgrp is valid, so we
don't have to hold cgroup_mutex when calling cgroup_task_count().
One similar example is in cgroup_tasks_open().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
---
kernel/cgroup_debug.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
index daca620..0c92d79 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup_debug.c
@@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ static u64 taskcount_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft)
{
u64 count;
- cgroup_lock();
count = cgroup_task_count(cont);
- cgroup_unlock();
return count;
}
--
1.5.4.rc3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-12 2:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-12 1:47 [PATCH] debug cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock Li Zefan
[not found] ` <49B869B7.1090108-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-12 2:43 ` Paul Menage
2009-03-12 2:43 ` Paul Menage
2009-03-12 2:49 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <6599ad830903111943u2799333dh680470f9daa6ccbb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-12 2:49 ` Li Zefan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-12 1:47 Li Zefan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.