All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
	Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@newdream.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:54:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CAFC68.5000102@themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CAE3DB.3030909@themaw.net>

Ian Kent wrote:
> Sage Weil wrote:
>> Would it be possible to avoid the upcall in revalidate, and instead fail 
>> and let the subsequent lookup path do it?  (I'm guessing the upcall 
>> doesn't happen for _every_ revalidate?)

snip ...

> 
> It was more than three years ago when I tried to make everything go
> through lookup so my memory is pretty unclear now. In the end I think
> there was one case in real_lookup() where the lookup was skipped,
> revalidate was called and failed but lookup wasn't then called again and
> I got an incorrect failure. AFAICR all other code paths that hold the
> mutex over lookup and revalidate perform the revalidate first and then
> the lookup if that fails, which avoids this case.

I've managed to locate the work that I did on this (on an old machine I
left as it was for posterity).

I haven't had a chance to look at what I did closely and a lot has
changed in autofs4 since. The one thing that I'm fairly sure I would
need to be able to make this work is the order of the calls in
real_lookup() to be revalidate then lookup. Would that work for
real_lookup() given that we hold the mutex now?

In fact this might be an opportunity for me to clean up my sloppy
DCACHE_AUTOFS_PENDING handling by moving it all under the inode mutex.

Since this is likely to be quite a bit of effort on my part could I
impose on you to help me understand the issue you need to resolve? I'd
really like to feel it's worth the effort.

Ian


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-26  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19 20:16 [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: clean up real_lookup Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-19 20:35     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-24  4:14 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-24  4:18   ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25  4:29     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-25  6:08       ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 16:11         ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 19:11           ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  2:09             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:53               ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  8:00                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 10:38                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-29  8:53                   ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  0:58                     ` Sage Weil
2009-04-03  2:00                       ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  3:07                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-22 17:15                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-23  0:37                           ` Ian Kent
2009-06-23  2:40                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25  7:21                               ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 13:41                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 13:58                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-23  2:42                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-24  2:28                             ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24  5:45                               ` Sage Weil
2009-06-24  9:17                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 17:46                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  2:50                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25  4:13                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25  4:49                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  5:52                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-09-17  6:36                                           ` Ian Kent
2009-07-20  2:45                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-28 22:47                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-07-29  2:59                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-07-29 16:57                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-07-30  0:56                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-07-30 17:47                                           ` Sage Weil
2009-07-31  2:03                                             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:54               ` Ian Kent [this message]
2009-03-26  4:03                 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  5:07                 ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49CAFC68.5000102@themaw.net \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yehuda@newdream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.