All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@newdream.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:13:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A42F976.8020406@themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906241019250.24576@cobra.newdream.net>

Sage Weil wrote:
> 
>> There are several cases I need to deal with, apart from path walks
>> initiated by the daemon which don't cause any call backs, and so are
>> largely handled by trivially returning success. The cases are, an
>> expiring dentry that will go away which ->lookup() can't yet handle, an
>> expiring dentry that won't go away which ->lookup() should be able to
>> handle already, and a straight out mount request which ->lookup() should
>> also be able to handle. The tail end of the expire cases can progress
>> concurrently with a mount, which is further complicated by the two cases
>> of going away or not, so it's all a bit tricky.
> 
> It sounds to me like revalidate should only return success in the trivial, 
> non-blocking case.  And the ->lookup() should be able to handle all 
> (other) cases.  I.e., things should still work correctly (perhaps more 
> slowly) without any d_revalidate() at all.  (It still looks like the main 
> change needed is for lookup to use d_obtain_alias, instead of returning 
> NULL unconditionally...)

How so?

I don't understand how d_obtain_alias() can help in this situation.
Can you elaborate please?

Ian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-25  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19 20:16 [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: clean up real_lookup Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-19 20:35     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-24  4:14 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-24  4:18   ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25  4:29     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-25  6:08       ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 16:11         ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 19:11           ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  2:09             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:53               ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  8:00                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 10:38                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-29  8:53                   ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  0:58                     ` Sage Weil
2009-04-03  2:00                       ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  3:07                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-22 17:15                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-23  0:37                           ` Ian Kent
2009-06-23  2:40                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25  7:21                               ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 13:41                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 13:58                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-23  2:42                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-24  2:28                             ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24  5:45                               ` Sage Weil
2009-06-24  9:17                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 17:46                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  2:50                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25  4:13                                     ` Ian Kent [this message]
2009-06-25  4:49                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  5:52                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-09-17  6:36                                           ` Ian Kent
2009-07-20  2:45                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-28 22:47                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-07-29  2:59                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-07-29 16:57                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-07-30  0:56                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-07-30 17:47                                           ` Sage Weil
2009-07-31  2:03                                             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:54               ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  4:03                 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  5:07                 ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A42F976.8020406@themaw.net \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yehuda@newdream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.