From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@newdream.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:40:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4040AA.5030108@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4023CF.7040203@themaw.net>
Ian Kent wrote:
>
> Sorry, I haven't had time to do more on this.
> There is also the issue of what to do about removing the autofs module
> and renaming autofs4 to autofs, as this will break the autofs module.
>
The autofs module is pretty much historic at this point. I say just
nuke it.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 20:16 [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: clean up real_lookup Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-19 20:35 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-24 4:14 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-24 4:18 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 4:29 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-25 6:08 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 16:11 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 19:11 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26 2:09 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 3:53 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26 8:00 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 10:38 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-29 8:53 ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03 0:58 ` Sage Weil
2009-04-03 2:00 ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03 3:07 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-22 17:15 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-23 0:37 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-23 2:40 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-06-25 7:21 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 13:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-23 2:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-24 2:28 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 5:45 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-24 9:17 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 17:46 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25 2:50 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 4:13 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 4:49 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25 5:52 ` Ian Kent
2009-09-17 6:36 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-20 2:45 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-28 22:47 ` Sage Weil
2009-07-29 2:59 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-29 16:57 ` Sage Weil
2009-07-30 0:56 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-30 17:47 ` Sage Weil
2009-07-31 2:03 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 3:54 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 4:03 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26 5:07 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4040AA.5030108@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yehuda@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.