All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Should I choose SLOW_WORK?
@ 2009-04-05 23:09 Jeff Garzik
  2009-04-05 23:33 ` Jesper Juhl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2009-04-05 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Howells; +Cc: LKML, linux-fsdevel

I am newly presented with


> Enable slow work thread pool (SLOW_WORK) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?
> 
> The slow work thread pool provides a number of dynamically allocated
> threads that can be used by the kernel to perform operations that
> take a relatively long time.
> 
> An example of this would be CacheFiles doing a path lookup followed
> by a series of mkdirs and a create call, all of which have to touch
> disk.


However, this does not tell me whether I need or want this.

And, why must the user make this choice at all?  Surely it can be 
auto-selected, if cachefs is enabled?  At a minimum, hide this under 
CONFIG_EMBEDDED or whatnot, so that most users don't see this choice, IMO.

	Jeff



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-05 23:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-05 23:09 Should I choose SLOW_WORK? Jeff Garzik
2009-04-05 23:33 ` Jesper Juhl

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.