From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
brice@myri.com, sgruszka@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] myr10ge: again fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:13:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F1F350.2080402@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F1B468.7020605@myri.com>
> This is strange. I wonder if it might be a cache footprint issue?
> My intentionally weak receiver is an athlon64 x2 "Toledo", and
> has only 512KB L2 cache. I can re-test with a core-2 based Xeon.
A point about netperf :) By default, it will use one more buffer than the
initial size of the socket buffer divided by the send/recv buffer size - this
goes back to days of copy-avoidance, a flavor of which can be found in reading:
ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/briefs/copyavoid.pdf
particularly section 3.2. It can be overridden with the global -W option:
-W send,recv Set the number of send,recv buffers
Of course, this will interact with other things such as:
The default send/recv size will be the send/recv socket buffer size. That can be
overridden with the test-specific -m/-M options.
The default socket buffer size will be whatever the system gives it. That can be
overridden with the test-specific -s/-S options.
So, the various options can have a non-trivial effect on the cache footprint of
the data netperf is shoving around.
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-24 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-15 8:09 [PATCH] myr10ge: again fix lro_gen_skb() alignment Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-04-15 9:28 ` David Miller
2009-04-15 9:48 ` Brice Goglin
2009-04-15 10:02 ` David Miller
2009-04-15 13:01 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-15 21:04 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-15 23:42 ` David Miller
2009-04-16 8:50 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-16 9:02 ` David Miller
2009-04-21 19:19 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-22 10:48 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-22 15:37 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-24 5:45 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-24 12:45 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-24 12:51 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-24 17:13 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2009-04-24 16:16 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-24 16:30 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-24 16:31 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-27 8:05 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-27 8:07 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-27 9:32 ` David Miller
2009-04-27 11:01 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-27 12:45 ` David Miller
2009-04-27 12:45 ` David Miller
2009-04-28 6:12 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-28 15:00 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-28 15:02 ` David Miller
2009-04-28 15:20 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-28 15:44 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-28 21:12 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-29 13:42 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-29 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 14:18 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-29 15:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 17:28 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-30 8:10 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-30 8:14 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-30 8:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-30 19:14 ` Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-23 8:00 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F1F350.2080402@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=brice@myri.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gallatin@myri.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.