From: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, john.cooper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add serial number support for virtio_blk, V2
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:00:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A117819.5060105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090518121325.GA32009@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:06:57PM -0400, john cooper wrote:
>> [Resend of earlier patch: 1/2 rebased to qemu-kvm,
>> 2/2 minor tweak]
>
> patch 1/2 seems to be missing.
It is in the kvm and qemu-devel list archives:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/maillist.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-05/msg00661.html
>
>> Equivalent functionality currently exists for IDE
>> and SCSI, however it is not yet implemented for
>> virtio.
>
> So why can't we re-use the existing interfaces instead of inventing a
> new one?
I'm unclear to what specifically you're referring -- the
ioctl() used to retrieve the serial number in the guest?
-john
--
john.cooper@redhat.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: john.cooper@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add serial number support for virtio_blk, V2
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:00:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A117819.5060105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090518121325.GA32009@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:06:57PM -0400, john cooper wrote:
>> [Resend of earlier patch: 1/2 rebased to qemu-kvm,
>> 2/2 minor tweak]
>
> patch 1/2 seems to be missing.
It is in the kvm and qemu-devel list archives:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/maillist.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-05/msg00661.html
>
>> Equivalent functionality currently exists for IDE
>> and SCSI, however it is not yet implemented for
>> virtio.
>
> So why can't we re-use the existing interfaces instead of inventing a
> new one?
I'm unclear to what specifically you're referring -- the
ioctl() used to retrieve the serial number in the guest?
-john
--
john.cooper@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-13 17:06 [PATCH 0/2] Add serial number support for virtio_blk, V2 john cooper
2009-05-13 17:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " john cooper
2009-05-18 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-18 12:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-18 15:00 ` john cooper [this message]
2009-05-18 15:00 ` john cooper
2009-05-20 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-20 7:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-20 7:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-05-20 7:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gleb Natapov
2009-05-27 0:26 ` john cooper
2009-05-27 0:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " john cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A117819.5060105@redhat.com \
--to=john.cooper@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.