From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>,
ajax@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:56:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1E8A16.3060101@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905281353.50463.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:21 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> We need a mechanism to toggle this for both this and virtio-blk. The
>>> reason a toggle is needed is so that 0.11 can create the same device
>>> model as 0.10.
>>>
>> Okay, so the scenario is:
>>
>> - 0.10 guest running on source machine
>>
>> - migrate to dest machine running 0.11
>>
>> - the device model cannot change or the guest OS will get confused
>>
>
> IMHO think the only sane response is "don't do that". Trying to support
> migration between different qemu versions just isn't worth the pain.
>
It is very worth the pain. I consider it a core requirement.
Supporting legacy workloads is an important aspect of virtualization.
If we cannot provide a consistent environment as we evolve over time,
then we cannot support legacy workloads.
It really isn't that hard, it just requires that we exercise care.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Paul
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 17:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-24 9:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-27 17:42 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-27 22:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 9:33 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 9:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 12:53 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 12:56 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-05-28 13:22 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 21:45 ` Dor Laor
2009-05-29 9:43 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-29 9:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-29 9:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-29 10:09 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:47 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 13:08 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 13:39 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:35 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 13:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-28 13:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 18:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-28 13:20 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A1E8A16.3060101@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.