From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
yanmin.zhang@intel.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:11:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2EA5D9.6050602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244566904-31470-3-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>
Mel Gorman wrote:
> There is a side-effect to this patch. Currently, if zone_reclaim()
> successfully reclaimed SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, an allocation attempt would
> go ahead. With this patch applied, zone watermarks are rechecked after
> zone_reclaim() does some work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
yanmin.zhang@intel.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:11:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2EA5D9.6050602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244566904-31470-3-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>
Mel Gorman wrote:
> There is a side-effect to this patch. Currently, if zone_reclaim()
> successfully reclaimed SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, an allocation attempt would
> go ahead. With this patch applied, zone watermarks are rechecked after
> zone_reclaim() does some work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 17:01 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:15 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-09 18:15 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 1:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 7:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 7:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:31 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:31 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 11:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 11:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 13:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 13:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 22:42 ` Ram Pai
2009-06-10 22:42 ` Ram Pai
2009-06-11 13:52 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 13:52 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 1:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-11 1:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-11 3:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-11 3:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:11 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2009-06-09 18:11 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 1:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:56 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-09 18:56 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 2:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 2:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 1:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 1:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 5:54 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 5:54 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 10:48 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:48 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2EA5D9.6050602@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.