All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	yanmin.zhang@intel.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:15:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2EA6A6.30003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244566904-31470-2-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

Mel Gorman wrote:

> This patch alters how zone_reclaim() works out how many pages it might be
> able to reclaim given the current reclaim_mode. If RECLAIM_SWAP is set
> in the reclaim_mode it will either consider NR_FILE_PAGES as potential
> candidates or else use NR_{IN}ACTIVE}_PAGES-NR_FILE_MAPPED to discount
> swapcache and other non-file-backed pages.  If RECLAIM_WRITE is not set,
> then NR_FILE_DIRTY number of pages are not candidates. If RECLAIM_SWAP is
> not set, then NR_FILE_MAPPED are not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	yanmin.zhang@intel.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:15:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2EA6A6.30003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244566904-31470-2-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

Mel Gorman wrote:

> This patch alters how zone_reclaim() works out how many pages it might be
> able to reclaim given the current reclaim_mode. If RECLAIM_SWAP is set
> in the reclaim_mode it will either consider NR_FILE_PAGES as potential
> candidates or else use NR_{IN}ACTIVE}_PAGES-NR_FILE_MAPPED to discount
> swapcache and other non-file-backed pages.  If RECLAIM_WRITE is not set,
> then NR_FILE_DIRTY number of pages are not candidates. If RECLAIM_SWAP is
> not set, then NR_FILE_MAPPED are not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-09 17:01 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:15   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2009-06-09 18:15     ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10  1:19   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10  1:19     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10  7:31     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10  7:31       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:31     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:31       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 11:59       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 11:59         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 13:41         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 13:41           ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 22:42           ` Ram Pai
2009-06-10 22:42             ` Ram Pai
2009-06-11 13:52             ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 13:52               ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11  1:29           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-11  1:29             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-11  3:26         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-11  3:26           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:11   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-09 18:11     ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10  1:52   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10  1:52     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 18:56   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-09 18:56     ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-10  1:47   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10  1:47     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:36     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:36       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10  2:10   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10  2:10     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 10:40     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:40       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 17:01   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10  1:53   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10  1:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10  5:54   ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10  5:54     ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 10:48     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 10:48       ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A2EA6A6.30003@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.