All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
To: arun c <arun.edarath@gmail.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	"Lavinen Jarkko (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
	<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/10] drivers/mmc: Move a dereference below a NULL test
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:43:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A64665B.9000504@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c656a4d20907200533t1cbe1476l62d8a51fdb796c70@mail.gmail.com>

arun c wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Adrian Hunter<adrian.hunter@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>>
>>> If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference should be moved below
>>> the NULL test.
>>>
>>> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
>>> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>>>
>>> // <smpl>
>>> @@
>>> type T;
>>> expression E,E1;
>>> identifier i,fld;
>>> statement S;
>>> @@
>>>
>>> - T i = E->fld;
>>> + T i;
>>>  ... when != Eá
>>>      when != i
>>>  BUG_ON (E = NULL||
>>> -     i
>>> +     E->fld
>>>       = NULL || ...);
>>> + i = E->fld;
>>> // </smpl>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/omap.c             |    5 +++--
>>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
>>> index e7a331d..89281ab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
>>> @@ -255,11 +255,12 @@ static void mmc_omap_slot_release_work(struct
>>> work_struct *work)
>>>   static void mmc_omap_release_slot(struct mmc_omap_slot *slot, int
>>> clk_enabled)
>>>  {
>>> -       struct mmc_omap_host *host = slot->host;
>>> +       struct mmc_omap_host *host;
>>>        unsigned long flags;
>>>        int i;
>>>  -       BUG_ON(slot = NULL || host->mmc = NULL);
>>> +       BUG_ON(slot = NULL || slot->host->mmc = NULL);
>>> +       host = slot->host;
>>>          if (clk_enabled)
>>>                /* Keeps clock running for at least 8 cycles on valid freq
>>> */
>>> --
>> If slot is NULL it will oops anyway, so the following is better IMHO:
>>
>> static void mmc_omap_release_slot(struct mmc_omap_slot *slot, int
>> clk_enabled)
>> {
>>        struct mmc_omap_host *host = slot->host;
>>        unsigned long flags;
>>        int i;
>>
>>> -       BUG_ON(slot = NULL || host->mmc = NULL);
>>> +       BUG_ON(host->mmc = NULL);
>>        if (clk_enabled)
>>                /* Keeps clock running for at least 8 cycles on valid freq */
>> --
> 
> According to http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyidh20&rss "NULL check"
> must be done before assigning the values. Does Julia Lawall's version
> is the more correct one??
> 
> Arun

It is not a "NULL check" it is an assertion, which can be compiled out.
On some platforms BUG is implemented as a null dereference anyway
e.g. on ARM  it is *(int *)0 = 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
To: arun c <arun.edarath@gmail.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	"Lavinen Jarkko (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
	<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/10] drivers/mmc: Move a dereference below a NULL test
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:43:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A64665B.9000504@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c656a4d20907200533t1cbe1476l62d8a51fdb796c70@mail.gmail.com>

arun c wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Adrian Hunter<adrian.hunter@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>>
>>> If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference should be moved below
>>> the NULL test.
>>>
>>> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
>>> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>>>
>>> // <smpl>
>>> @@
>>> type T;
>>> expression E,E1;
>>> identifier i,fld;
>>> statement S;
>>> @@
>>>
>>> - T i = E->fld;
>>> + T i;
>>>  ... when != E=E1
>>>      when != i
>>>  BUG_ON (E == NULL||
>>> -     i
>>> +     E->fld
>>>       == NULL || ...);
>>> + i = E->fld;
>>> // </smpl>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/omap.c             |    5 +++--
>>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
>>> index e7a331d..89281ab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
>>> @@ -255,11 +255,12 @@ static void mmc_omap_slot_release_work(struct
>>> work_struct *work)
>>>   static void mmc_omap_release_slot(struct mmc_omap_slot *slot, int
>>> clk_enabled)
>>>  {
>>> -       struct mmc_omap_host *host = slot->host;
>>> +       struct mmc_omap_host *host;
>>>        unsigned long flags;
>>>        int i;
>>>  -       BUG_ON(slot == NULL || host->mmc == NULL);
>>> +       BUG_ON(slot == NULL || slot->host->mmc == NULL);
>>> +       host = slot->host;
>>>          if (clk_enabled)
>>>                /* Keeps clock running for at least 8 cycles on valid freq
>>> */
>>> --
>> If slot is NULL it will oops anyway, so the following is better IMHO:
>>
>> static void mmc_omap_release_slot(struct mmc_omap_slot *slot, int
>> clk_enabled)
>> {
>>        struct mmc_omap_host *host = slot->host;
>>        unsigned long flags;
>>        int i;
>>
>>> -       BUG_ON(slot == NULL || host->mmc == NULL);
>>> +       BUG_ON(host->mmc == NULL);
>>        if (clk_enabled)
>>                /* Keeps clock running for at least 8 cycles on valid freq */
>> --
> 
> According to http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6820&rss "NULL check"
> must be done before assigning the values. Does Julia Lawall's version
> is the more correct one??
> 
> Arun

It is not a "NULL check" it is an assertion, which can be compiled out.
On some platforms BUG is implemented as a null dereference anyway
e.g. on ARM  it is *(int *)0 = 0;


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-20 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-19 15:30 [PATCH 9/10] drivers/mmc: Move a dereference below a NULL test Julia Lawall
2009-07-19 15:30 ` Julia Lawall
2009-07-20  8:01 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-07-20  8:01   ` Adrian Hunter
2009-07-20 12:33   ` arun c
2009-07-20 12:45     ` arun c
2009-07-20 12:43     ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2009-07-20 12:43       ` Adrian Hunter
2009-07-20 12:47       ` Alan Cox
2009-07-20 12:47         ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A64665B.9000504@nokia.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
    --cc=arun.edarath@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.