All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:32:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB74129.90402@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090921084248.GC12726@csn.ul.ie>

Mel Gorman wrote:
>> I applied the three patches from Mel and one from Tejun.
>>     
>
> Thanks Sachin
>
> Was there any useful result from Tejun's patch applied on its own?
>   
Haven't tried with just the patch from Tejun. I will give this a try.
I might not get a chance to test this until late in the evening my time.
(Today being a holiday for me )

>> Tejun, the above hang looks exactly the same as the one
>> i have reported here :
>>
>> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-September/075791.html
>>
>> This particular hang was bisected to the following patch
>>
>> powerpc64: convert to dynamic percpu allocator
>>
>> This hang can be recreated without SLQB. So i think this is a different
>> problem. 
>>
>>     
>
> Was that bug ever resolved?
>   
The bug was still present with git9(78f28b..). With latest git
git10(ebc79c4 ..)i haven't tested it yet because of perf counter
build errors.

Thanks
-Sachin


-- 

---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:32:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB74129.90402@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090921084248.GC12726@csn.ul.ie>

Mel Gorman wrote:
>> I applied the three patches from Mel and one from Tejun.
>>     
>
> Thanks Sachin
>
> Was there any useful result from Tejun's patch applied on its own?
>   
Haven't tried with just the patch from Tejun. I will give this a try.
I might not get a chance to test this until late in the evening my time.
(Today being a holiday for me )

>> Tejun, the above hang looks exactly the same as the one
>> i have reported here :
>>
>> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-September/075791.html
>>
>> This particular hang was bisected to the following patch
>>
>> powerpc64: convert to dynamic percpu allocator
>>
>> This hang can be recreated without SLQB. So i think this is a different
>> problem. 
>>
>>     
>
> Was that bug ever resolved?
>   
The bug was still present with git9(78f28b..). With latest git
git10(ebc79c4 ..)i haven't tested it yet because of perf counter
build errors.

Thanks
-Sachin


-- 

---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-21  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-18 19:34 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Hatchet job for SLQB on memoryless configurations Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-20  8:45   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20  8:45     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 10:00     ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-20 10:00       ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-20 10:12       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 10:12         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 15:55         ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-20 15:55           ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21  6:24           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21  6:24             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21  8:46             ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  8:46               ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  8:30           ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21  8:42             ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  8:42               ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:00               ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21  9:00                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21  9:44                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:44                   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:53                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21  9:53                     ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 10:04                     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 10:04                       ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:02               ` Sachin Sant [this message]
2009-09-21  9:02                 ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21  9:09                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:09                   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:04               ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:04                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:31                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 13:31                   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 13:45                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 13:45                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 13:57                   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:57                     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 23:54                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-21 23:54                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-20 14:04     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-20 14:04       ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] slqb: Treat pages freed on a memoryless node as local node Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 21:01   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-18 21:01     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-19 11:46     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-19 11:46       ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:34       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-21 17:34         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-22 13:33         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 13:33           ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 18:29           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-22 18:29             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] slqb: Allow SLQB to be used on PPC and S390 Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AB74129.90402@in.ibm.com \
    --to=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.