From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] multiqueue changes
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:13:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACDD762.9080101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091008120039.GA8691@ff.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:03:44AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> ...
>> num_tx_queues. But it seems we should rather use more often
>> real_num_tx_queue in schedulers code like dumps and maybe more
>> (like e.g. sch_multiq does).
>
> ...i.e. probably everywhere between dev_activate and dev_deactivate
> all qdisc operations could use real_num_tx_queues (including a test
> like: netif_is_real_multique), unless I miss something.
I am not sure David intent was being able to dynamically adjust real_num_tx_queue
between 1 and num_tx_queue.
For low/moderate traffic, its better to use one queue, to lower IRQ activations,
and let some cpus sleep longer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-08 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-08 7:18 [RFC] multiqueue changes Eric Dumazet
2009-10-08 9:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-08 12:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-08 12:13 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-08 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-09 7:58 ` David Miller
2009-10-28 17:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 21:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-29 16:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-29 21:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-29 22:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-30 10:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-31 17:25 ` Michael Chan
2009-11-01 13:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-02 11:35 ` David Miller
2009-11-02 12:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-02 12:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-02 13:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-02 13:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-02 13:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 14:10 ` [PATCH] net: Introduce realloc_netdev_mq() Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 14:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 15:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 16:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 16:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 17:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 19:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 20:29 ` [PATCH v4] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 21:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 21:31 ` David Miller
2009-12-03 21:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 21:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 22:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 23:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-04 7:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-04 10:51 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-12-04 11:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-04 13:01 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-04 13:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-16 22:50 ` Michael Chan
2010-01-17 0:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-17 16:56 ` Michael Chan
2010-01-17 22:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 18:29 ` Michael Chan
2010-01-18 19:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC] multiqueue changes Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-09 9:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACDD762.9080101@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.