From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Commit 34d76c41 causes linker errors on ia64 with NR_CPUS=4096
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:08:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADDB640.4020707@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091020063555.GJ8550@elte.hu>
On 10/20/2009 02:35 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>>> Commit 34d76c41 introduced percpu array update_shares_data, size of which
>>>> being proportional to NR_CPUS. Unfortunately this blows up ia64 for large
>>>> NR_CPUS configuration, as ia64 allows only 64k for .percpu section.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by allocating this array dynamically and keep only pointer to it
>>>> percpu.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/sched.c | 15 +++++++--------
>>>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Seems like an IA64 bug to me.
>>
>> IA64 guys actually use that as some kind of optimization for fast
>> access to the percpu data in their pagefault handler, as far as I
>> know.
>
> Still looks like a bug if it causes a breakage (linker error) on IA64,
> and if the 'fix' (i'd call it a workaround) causes a (small but nonzero)
> performance regression on other architectures.
The linker error isn't a bug, it's enforcement. The ia64 linker script
explicitly rewinds the location pointer back to the start of
.data.percpu + 64k to start the .data section to cause the error if
.data.percpu is larger than 64k.
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Commit 34d76c41 causes linker errors on ia64 with NR_CPUS=4096
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:08:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADDB640.4020707@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091020063555.GJ8550@elte.hu>
On 10/20/2009 02:35 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>>> Commit 34d76c41 introduced percpu array update_shares_data, size of which
>>>> being proportional to NR_CPUS. Unfortunately this blows up ia64 for large
>>>> NR_CPUS configuration, as ia64 allows only 64k for .percpu section.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by allocating this array dynamically and keep only pointer to it
>>>> percpu.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/sched.c | 15 +++++++--------
>>>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Seems like an IA64 bug to me.
>>
>> IA64 guys actually use that as some kind of optimization for fast
>> access to the percpu data in their pagefault handler, as far as I
>> know.
>
> Still looks like a bug if it causes a breakage (linker error) on IA64,
> and if the 'fix' (i'd call it a workaround) causes a (small but nonzero)
> performance regression on other architectures.
The linker error isn't a bug, it's enforcement. The ia64 linker script
explicitly rewinds the location pointer back to the start of
.data.percpu + 64k to start the .data section to cause the error if
.data.percpu is larger than 64k.
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-18 22:28 Commit 34d76c41 causes linker errors on ia64 with NR_CPUS=4096 Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 2:02 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 2:02 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 4:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 4:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 5:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 5:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 5:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 5:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 6:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 6:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 6:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 6:27 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:27 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 14:18 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 14:18 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 14:49 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 14:49 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-21 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-21 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-21 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-21 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-21 22:11 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-21 22:11 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-22 14:49 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-22 14:49 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-22 14:53 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-22 14:53 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-22 22:24 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-22 22:24 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-23 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 12:30 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-23 12:30 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-26 16:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-26 16:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-26 20:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 20:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-27 10:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-27 10:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-27 10:52 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-27 10:52 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 6:26 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:26 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 7:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 7:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 7:39 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 7:39 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 7:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 7:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 7:17 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 7:17 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 7:36 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 7:36 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 13:08 ` Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2009-10-20 13:08 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 13:57 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 13:57 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 13:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 13:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-21 6:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-21 6:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-20 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-20 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADDB640.4020707@suse.com \
--to=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.