CAS implementation may be broken

[trd@45mercystreet.com (Toby Douglass)]

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

[snip]

No comments on everything else and the other posts; still digesting them.

> I believe there is a solution to the ABA problem using atomic operations
> with one 32-bit word and a separate counter to identify updates, but it
> requires a little more time than I have available this evening to fully
> put together.

I've implemented the pointer-counter solution on x86/x64.  Indeed, it 
turns out you can use them on ARM, since there is a double-word ldrex. 
However, and this is part of what I'm currently thinking about, I was 
under the impression LL/SC meant *single word CAS* could work without a 
counter.

I think you'd never implement pointer-counter in the kernel, as your 
basic CAS, because plain CAS is all you need for certain things and the 
user can easily implement pointer-counter on top of plain CAS.

OTOH, perhaps it is nice to offer a plain CAS API and an ABA-safe CAS API.