From: trd@45mercystreet.com (Toby Douglass)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: CAS implementation may be broken
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:14:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0C147B.9030506@45mercystreet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124153624.GC14462@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
I wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> (I argued initially for a LL / SC interface but the arguments
>> I was making were shot down by Linus et.al. as completely
>> unreasonable and technically idiotic.)
> Were they?
My question is I think in hindsight misinterpretable.
What I mean is; you're a reasonable and intelligent bloke. You have
your views in this matter and Linus et al have theirs; they thought what
you said was crazy. Having heard them out, what did you think of what
they said? were there valid arguments in there?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 18:09 GCC built-in atomic operations and memory barriers Toby Douglass
2009-11-04 19:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-04 20:12 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-04 21:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-06 19:10 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-04 22:09 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2009-11-06 19:17 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-21 15:21 ` CAS implementation may be broken Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 15:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-23 19:10 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-23 20:34 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 15:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 15:15 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 15:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-24 16:20 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 16:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 17:14 ` Toby Douglass [this message]
2009-11-25 1:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-26 16:14 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-27 1:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-24 15:33 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 15:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-23 16:40 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 22:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-23 23:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-24 1:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-24 11:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 22:24 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-25 11:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-25 18:57 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 22:34 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 22:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-25 0:34 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 9:38 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 15:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 16:34 ` Toby Douglass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0C147B.9030506@45mercystreet.com \
--to=trd@45mercystreet.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.